On 2023-02-16, Grant Edwards wrote:
> A while back, I stumbled across a web page or blog entry that
> explained how to safely use grub2 with it installed in a partition
> instead of a device (e.g. grub is installed in /dev/sda10 instead of
> /dev/sda).
And of course 20 minutes after I posted thi
A while back, I stumbled across a web page or blog entry that
explained how to safely use grub2 with it installed in a partition
instead of a device (e.g. grub is installed in /dev/sda10 instead of
/dev/sda).
IIRC, it involved locking a couple key files in the /boot/grub
directory so that they can
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Freeman
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 6:24 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Jobs and load-average
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:39 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> > I've just looked at 'man make', from which it's
>-Original Message-
>From: John Covici
>Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 7:20 AM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: my 5.15.93 kernel keeps rebooting
>
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:50:27 -0500,
>Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-02-14, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:24:08 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:39 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> > I've just looked at 'man make', from which it's clear that -j = --jobs, and
> > that both those and --load-average are passed to /usr/bin/make, presumably
> > untouched unless p
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:08 AM John Covici wrote:
>
> hmmm, but what should I use for the source ip, I only assign those
> when I bring the interface up when I start the interface -- I have
> something like this:
> [Unit]
> Description=Network Connectivity for %i
> ...
> So, before I run this, I
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:39 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> I've just looked at 'man make', from which it's clear that -j = --jobs, and
> that both those and --load-average are passed to /usr/bin/make, presumably
> untouched unless portage itself has identically named variables. So I wonder
> how fe
address=192.168.0.1
netmask=24
broadcast=192.168.0.255
So, before I run this, I don't think the card has any ip address, does
it?
>From what you hope the receiving machine
arp -a
?
HTH,
Mark
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:11:12 -0500,
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM John Covici wrote:
> >
> > The sending computer has two nics, eno1 for the internal network and
> > eno2 is on the internet. So, my netconsole stanza said
> > netconsole=@192.168.0.1/eno1,@192.168.0.2
>
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 12:23:52 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
--->8 Much useful detail.
That all makes perfect sense, and is what I'd assumed, but it's good to have
it confirmed.
> The load average setting is definitely useful and I would definitely
> set it, but when the issue is swapping it
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 5:32 AM Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:53:30 +
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> > Yes, I was aware of that, but why didn't --load-average=32 take precedence?
> This only means that emerge would not schedule additional package job
> (where a package job means
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM John Covici wrote:
>
> The sending computer has two nics, eno1 for the internal network and
> eno2 is on the internet. So, my netconsole stanza said
> netconsole=@192.168.0.1/eno1,@192.168.0.2
Is CONFIG_NETCONSOLE enabled for your kernel?
I'm not sure if the ker
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:50:27 -0500,
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-14, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > Where are you getting this from, the system log/journal? This doesn't
> > seem like a clean shutdown, so if it is a kernel PANIC I wouldn't
> > expect the most critical info to be in the log (s
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:53:30 +
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 13:18:24 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > First, keep in mind that --jobs=16 + -j16 can result in up to 256
> > (16*16) tasks running at once. Of course, that is worst case and most
> > of the time you'll have
On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 13:18:24 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> First, keep in mind that --jobs=16 + -j16 can result in up to 256
> (16*16) tasks running at once. Of course, that is worst case and most
> of the time you'll have way less than that.
Yes, I was aware of that, but why didn't --loa
15 matches
Mail list logo
