On 3/6/21 4:52 am, antlists wrote:
> On 28/05/2021 17:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> Anything with spinning disk "is obsolete" they are trying to give it
>>> way because nobody is buying them (you can buy them for few dollars),
>>> don't expect it to last long.
>>
>> I've never had a hard drive fa
On 28/05/2021 17:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
Anything with spinning disk "is obsolete" they are trying to give it
way because nobody is buying them (you can buy them for few dollars),
don't expect it to last long.
I've never had a hard drive fail on me. That includes a 2008 core2
duo that I shut
On 6/2/21 1:48 AM, Fannys wrote:
Tech should be based on tech. Not faith and trust on the other party.
That's where detection of breach of trust comes into play. Thus DNSSEC
and things related.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 6/2/21 1:21 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Do you know which extensions add this?
I don't remember exactly (they weren't compatible with Firefox 78) but
from memory, they were from the CZ NIC operator. They have many things
related to this.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
I've noticed something surprising (to me) about the order that 'emerge -auvND
world'
decides to install/upgrade/reinstall packages. The situation is as follows:
* A large number of packages need to be build/installed/reinstalled
* Hit control-C during the build of package X
* Restart 'emerge -
Is this an error? The messages don't even say what pgm they come from:
>>> Installing (1 of 103) sys-devel/automake-1.16.3-r1::gentoo
* ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/tty
* ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/tty
* ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/null
/var/tmp/portage/._portage_reinsta
Hi,
At the weekend I updated my system and after reboot some of my apps
have lots of black black squares/rectangles all over the place, covering
all of the app window and making email difficult to write.
Initially I thought this was a Wayland problem as using Wayfire but
switched to X11 desktop
On June 2, 2021 1:51:06 AM UTC, Grant Taylor
wrote:
>On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> *Any* CA can just generate a new key and sign the corresponding
>> certificate.
>
>This is where what can /technically/ be done diverges from what is
>/allowed/ to be done.
>
>CAs adhering to the
On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 12:28:49 AM CEST Fannys wrote:
> On June 1, 2021 4:45:45 AM UTC, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> >On Saturday, May 29, 2021 8:26:57 AM CEST Walter Dnes wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 03:08:39AM +0200, zca...@gmail.com wrote
> >>
> >> > 125 config files in /etc/ssl/certs ne
On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 3:51:06 AM CEST Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > All browsers will treat their fake certificate corresponding to the
> > fake key on their fake web server as completely legitimate. The "real"
> > original key that you generated has no s
10 matches
Mail list logo
