On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 23:41:00 - (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> >>> Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this
> >>> library (version 0x50e01)
> >>
> >> RTFM when using Gentoo.
> >
> > Which manual? I haven't changed my behavior regarding updating my
> > system in fifteen y
On Sunday, 8 March 2020 19:04:02 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:23 AM Rudi wrote:
> > While I usually side with AMD for their contributions to the Open
> > Sourced community, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that even
> > though they're funded by Intel the fact that they'
On 2020.03.08 19:41, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2020-03-08, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 08/03/2020 03:22, Alan Grimes wrote:
Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this
library (version 0x50e01)
>>
>> RTFM when using Gentoo.
>
Which manual? I haven't ch
On 2020-03-08, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 08/03/2020 03:22, Alan Grimes wrote:
>>> Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this library
>>> (version 0x50e01)
>>
>> RTFM when using Gentoo.
>
> Which manual? I haven't changed my behavior regarding updating
On 3/8/20 4:22 PM, Consus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
> without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
> stable ebuild, so IMO there is actually no point in manual unmasking,
> because user does not have any choice
For me there is no point in having a "stable" gentoo managed like this (I
really like debian stable). I'm using unstable gentoo since 2017 because a
whole bunch of packages I installed only exist in ~amd64.
Il Dom 8 Mar 2020, 21:22 Consus ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is it somehow possible to install u
Hi,
Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
stable ebuild, so IMO there is actually no point in manual unmasking,
because user does not have any choice between stable/unstable.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:23 AM Rudi wrote:
>
> While I usually side with AMD for their contributions to the Open
> Sourced community, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that even
> though they're funded by Intel the fact that they've been keeping the
> specifics quiet proves that they're tryin
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/03/2020 03:22, Alan Grimes wrote:
>> Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this library
>> (version 0x50e01)
>
> RTFM when using Gentoo.
Which manual? I haven't changed my behavior regarding updating my system
in fifteen years. =|
--
Clowns fe
"While Hardware Unboxed found disclosures that Intel funded the research,
raising concerns about the objectivity of the study, the authors have also
received backing from Intel (and other sources) for finding flaws in the
company's own chips as well as other products. It appears to just be a gen
Just in case Intel felt lonely in the vulnerabilities game, some researchers
(also funded by Intel) managed to reveal the illusion of secure computing is
probably in the past:
https://www.engadget.com/2020/03/08/amd-cpu-take-a-way-data-leak-security-flaw
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On 08/03/2020 03:22, Alan Grimes wrote:
Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this library
(version 0x50e01)
RTFM when using Gentoo.
On Sunday, 8 March 2020 01:22:40 GMT Alan Grimes wrote:
> I'm just writing to congratulate the linux community for F-ing up
> something as semingly simple as a terminal window as well as they did...
>
> Fortunately X-term is OK, you have to manually adjust the settings of
> each one you pop open b
13 matches
Mail list logo
