LMP:
> +AD4 You can get pin status with
> +AD4 statserial /dev/ttyS9
> +AD4
>
> I hate to butt in, but statserial seems like it would be quite
> useful... And yet I can't figure out which package it's in on Gentoo.
> It's not in setserial, doesn't have its own package, and isn't
> discoverable
Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
>> You can get pin status with
>> statserial /dev/ttyS9
>>
> I hate to butt in, but statserial seems like it would be quite
> useful... And yet I can't figure out which package it's in on Gentoo.
> It's not in setserial, doesn't have its own package, and isn't
> discove
> You can get pin status with
> statserial /dev/ttyS9
>
I hate to butt in, but statserial seems like it would be quite
useful... And yet I can't figure out which package it's in on Gentoo.
It's not in setserial, doesn't have its own package, and isn't
discoverable via eix or pfl... Is there
On 03/24 06:35, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2019-03-24, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In my PC there is a quad uart PCIe-adapter with Oxford Chipset.
> > With lspci it is listed as:
> > 04:00.0 Serial controller: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd OX16PCI954 (Quad 16950
> > UART) function 0 (Uart)
>
On Monday, 25 March 2019 09:04:16 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:50:09 +, Mick wrote:
> > In my system I also only have 2.7 and 3.6 installed:
> >
> > $ eselect python list
> >
> > Available Python interpreters, in order of preference:
> > [1] python3.6
> > [2] pyth
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:27:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > It's been reported and the bug includes a fix.
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677890
>
> Nothing showed up when I searched for it. I often find that these days.
I searched for "ALL genlop", it was the most recent h
On Sunday, 24 March 2019 15:48:59 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:01:11 +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > > Has anyone else noticed that genlop -c duplicates every entry? It's
> > > been doing that here for some time, on more than one machine.
> >
> > I also noticed it, but not dug
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:50:09 +, Mick wrote:
> In my system I also only have 2.7 and 3.6 installed:
>
> $ eselect python list
> Available Python interpreters, in order of preference:
> [1] python3.6
> [2] python2.7 (fallback)
>
> However, python-exec.conf only contains 3.6 ... from wh
Hi,
On lun. 4 mars 11:05:59 2019, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded one of my routers to 4.19, and I experienced some loss on
> IPv6 only. It led to BGP sessions going down and ping loss (~10 %) while
> IPv4 was still all good, even on the neighbors.
> I reverted to 4.14, and now all is
On Monday, 25 March 2019 00:40:35 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I see what happened. python-exec.conf contained
>
> python2.7
> python3.5
> python3.6
> python3.4
>
> I only have 2.7 and 3.6 installed.
[snip ...]
In my system I also only have 2.7 and 3.6 installed:
$ eselect python list
Available
10 matches
Mail list logo
