On Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:22:26 AM CET the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 03/14/2018 08:52 PM, Danny YUE wrote:
> > On 2018-03-14 20:08, Poncho wrote:
> >> On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >>> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
> >>> Currently pdftk is mas
lete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
'=net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.18.6::gentoo'`.
* The complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/net-libs:webkit-gtk-2.18.6:20180314-223248.log'.
* For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage
On 03/14/2018 08:52 PM, Danny YUE wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-14 20:08, Poncho wrote:
>> On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>>> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
>>>
>>> The packages require GCC
On 2018-03-14, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>>
>> I'm assuming that was meant as a question?
>
> It was phrased as a question, so yes
On 2018-03-14 20:08, Poncho wrote:
> On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
>>
>> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the
>>
On 14/03/18 02:54, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
https://v.gd/PZkiuR
Does anyone know more details?
This looks like it's either completely fake, or based on half-truths:
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-security-vulnerability-%E2%80%93-the-day-after-seems-financially-motivated.html
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>
> I'm assuming that was meant as a question?
It was phrased as a question, so yes, it was a question. You, however, have
writte
Thelma:
> I just upgraded two system and did not run into any problem with
> dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1
>
> Try unmerging previous version if you have one installed and try again.
No, didn't have any, thanks for answering anyhow.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
On 03/14/2018 02:01 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:10:21 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
>>
>> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are th
On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
>
> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the
> 17.0 profiles.
>
> I use pdftk only to merg
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:10:21 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
>
> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the
> 17.0 profiles.
>
> I use pd
On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
I'm assuming that was meant as a question?
A few seconds with Google came up with these:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-text/qpdf
http://repo.or.cz/marcv-overlay.git/tree/HEAD:/ap
On 03/14/2018 01:35 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Is this a bug or is there something wrong on my side ?
>
> * Messages for package dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1:
>
> * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * failed to build format texmf-dist/fmtutil/f
Is this a bug or is there something wrong on my side ?
* Messages for package dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1:
* ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* failed to build format texmf-dist/fmtutil/format.texlive-basic.cnf
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh,
Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/
The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the
17.0 profiles.
I use pdftk only to merge two pdf file (overlap tax form).
eg.
pdftk t4-flat-02b.pdf stam
Running: emerge @preserved-rebuild
my system wants to install "net-print/cups-2.2.6" unstable. I don't know why?
emerge -avq @preserved-rebuild
[ebuild R ] dev-perl/DBD-Pg-3.5.3
[ebuild U ] net-print/cups-2.2.6 [2.1.4] USE="X dbus java pam ssl threads
-acl -debug -kerberos -lprng-compa
On 03/13/2018 06:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
[snip]
>
> Do you have PYTHON_TARGETS or PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET set anywhere? If so,
> unset it. Try "grep -r PYTHON /etc/portage/make.conf"
>
> Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than
> trying to cherry pick when you think ne
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:32:24 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > If portage needed to be emerged first, portage would do so. That used
> > to be the approach years ago, when portage updates were more
> > significant.
>
> There's still room for confusion, though. For a long time, an update to
> po
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 09:26:17 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than
> > > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated.
> >
> > " emerge -uDNavq world
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than
> > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated.
>
> " emerge -uDNavq world" appears to be working (and new "portage" is
> there). I have 428-pa
Le 14/03/18 à 05:37, Nikos Chantziaras a tapoté :
> You know how it is. As soon you ask, you find the answer anyway... :P
>
>FEATURES=keeptemp emerge foo-bar/baz
Or :
- enable PORT_LOGDIR in make.conf
- add (optionally) some FEATURES like clean-logs or split-log
See man 5 make.conf.
> $ l
21 matches
Mail list logo
