On 2017-12-04 18:13, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I guess I'll have to remember to use 500M+ /boot partitions now. Sigh.
I don't get it.
matica!7 rc$ du /boot/grub
2022/boot/grub/i386-pc
1340/boot/grub/fonts
2785/boot/grub/themes/starfield
2786/boot/grub/themes
3163/boot/grub/locale
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:11 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On my 16 core opteron I have to do -j32 or sometimes -j64 to be using
> everything all the time, is this normal? If I don't do this it won't be
> pegged at 100% all the time.
>
I use a ramdisk and anything over -j${NCPU} (incl. hyperthread
On my 16 core opteron I have to do -j32 or sometimes -j64 to be using
everything all the time, is this normal? If I don't do this it won't be
pegged at 100% all the time.
I assume using a ramdisk would help with this? I wouldn't want to do a
SSD as I assume it would excessively wear by doing c
On 12/04/17 18:15, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 12/04/2017 09:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
Well, it copies from /usr/share/grub and /lib/grub to /boot/grub, and
the sum of those directories are 270M without any kernels, etc
installed. I guess I'm going to have to tarball everything up,
repartition,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:52:24AM +1100, Adam Carter wrote
>
> Is there a downside to adding -fPIC to CFLAGs? It seems to allow
> everything to build and the system is working.
It'll slow down some programs/libraries. I wonder if you also need to
enable "USE="pic"...
[d531][waltdnes][~] grep
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 12/03/17 07:12, Mick wrote:
> > On 03-12-2017 ,10:57:33, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 2 December 2017 12:30:57 GMT Mick wrote:
> >>> I'm getting this error after I changed my profile as per
> >>> '2017-11-30-new-17-
> >>> profiles' news item:
> >> Comp
On 12/04/2017 09:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> Well, it copies from /usr/share/grub and /lib/grub to /boot/grub, and
> the sum of those directories are 270M without any kernels, etc
> installed. I guess I'm going to have to tarball everything up,
> repartition, and untar it.
>
> I guess I'll h
On 12/04/17 17:54, Daniel Frey wrote:
On 12/03/17 07:12, Mick wrote:
On 03-12-2017 ,10:57:33, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 12:30:57 GMT Mick wrote:
I'm getting this error after I changed my profile as per
'2017-11-30-new-17-
profiles' news item:
Compiling source in
/data
On 12/03/17 07:12, Mick wrote:
On 03-12-2017 ,10:57:33, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 12:30:57 GMT Mick wrote:
I'm getting this error after I changed my profile as per
'2017-11-30-new-17-
profiles' news item:
Compiling source in /data/tmp_var/portage/sys-boot/grub-0.97-r16
> > Good question. I've been using a pie-enabled gcc 7.2 for months before
> > the 17.0 profile switch and both acroread and skype (the new one)
> > still work, so chances are your stuff will too.
>
> Years ago when I used acroread I found it quite irritating that it came
> with its own bundled gtk
On 2017-12-05 00:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > There are a number of third-party binary executables that I use
> > regularly on my Gentoo systems. These are dynamically linked,
> > x86-64, programs that typically depend on various X11 and Qt/Gtk
> > libraries. They were either extracted from
Possibly due to messing around with hardened in the past, i'm finding that
many packages are reporting that they need -fPIC now that i'm on 17.0 (and
gcc 7.2 FWIW). I've added it to CFLAGs, as manually adding to each failed
package via package.env was getting non-trivial.
>From the GCC man page it
On 2017-12-05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:42:45 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> There are a number of third-party binary executables that I use
>> regularly on my Gentoo systems. [...]
>>
>> Is switching to the new 17.0 profile likely to break them?
>
> Good question. I've
HHi,
I did it,
I started emerge -e @world --keep-going.
And it failed while installing linux-gazette:
>>> Emerging (370 of 2114) app-doc/linux-gazette-117::gentoo
>>> Installing (360 of 2114) app-doc/linux-gazette-31::gentoo
>>> Emerging (371 of 2114) app-doc/linux-gazette-69::gentoo
>>> Install
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:42:45 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> There are a number of third-party binary executables that I use
> regularly on my Gentoo systems. These are dynamically linked, x86-64,
> programs that typically depend on various X11 and Qt/Gtk libraries.
> They were either extracted fro
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 03:58:40 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> Hi,
>
> what could fail, when doing the change to PIE-enabled applications
> on base of the regular updates?
> Compilation may fail, if libs are included and not flagged as to be
> recompiled, which are of the "old standard"...
>
There are a number of third-party binary executables that I use
regularly on my Gentoo systems. These are dynamically linked, x86-64,
programs that typically depend on various X11 and Qt/Gtk libraries.
They were either extracted from .rpm/.deb files or distributed as
shell-archive self-installers
On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 17:35, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
>>>
>>> Your system is somewhat br
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:35:27 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
> This sounds like good advice but I have a question concerning
> --depclean. I would have thought that
>
> Any package --depclean would remove is not required by anything
> in @world so would not be merged by emerge -e @world
That
On 12/04/2017 12:48 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 12/03/2017 03:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> However, you can delay switching to the new profile for a while.
>
> For how long?
>
> eselect news item tells me:
>
> "Please migrate away from the 13.0 profiles within the six weeks afte
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:48AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> > It doesn't build here; I get a few errors, thus:
> >
> > 9:41.58 ../../build/unix/gold/ld: error: /var/tmp/portage/www-client/
> > palemoon-27.6.2/work/palemoon-27.6
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:48AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
> It doesn't build here; I get a few errors, thus:
>
> 9:41.58 ../../build/unix/gold/ld: error: /var/tmp/portage/www-client/
> palemoon-27.6.2/work/palemoon-27.6.2/o/toolkit/library/../../media/
> libstagefright/Unified_cpp_media_lib
On 12/03/2017 03:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> However, you can delay switching to the new profile for a while.
For how long?
eselect news item tells me:
"Please migrate away from the 13.0 profiles within the six weeks after
GCC 6.4.0 has been stabilized on your architecture. The 13.0 profil
On 04/12/2017 17:35, allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
>>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
[1 ]
>>
>> Your system is somewhat broken I think. You need to look at each
>> package and
On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>>
>>> [1 ]
>
> Your system is somewhat broken I think. You need to look at each
> package and resolve the problem - possibly stray entries in one of
Hello,
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, Marc Joliet wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 3. Dezember 2017, 21:22:23 CET schrieb Marc Joliet:
>> Of course, that doesn't mean that things are correct on your end, though.
>> On one of my computers, checksec does say "PIE enabled". Maybe you should
>> try compiling something els
Hello,
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, ckard wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
>> is there any way to check, whether a compilated binary is using
>> the position-independant-code feature or is still build according
>> to old standards?
>
>You can use app-admin/checksec to see if different secur
Attempting to address the other ebuilds in your list:
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:49:02 CET schrieb John Covici:
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "app-misc/tmux" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> !!! request:
> - app-misc/tmux-:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:15:48 -0500,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:11:42 -0500, John Covici wrote:
>
> > > > > hmmm, I do updates on a monthly or more often basis, at the end of
> > > > > each I get the message no outdated packages found on your
> > > > > system. I don't
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:11:42 -0500, John Covici wrote:
> > > > hmmm, I do updates on a monthly or more often basis, at the end of
> > > > each I get the message no outdated packages found on your
> > > > system. I don't think I should be getting these messages for
> > > > things like tmux, which
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:00:45 -0500,
John Covici wrote:
>
> Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 07:25:28 -0500,
> Marc Joliet wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 13:14:23 CET schrieb John Covici:
> > > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 06:53:46 -0500,
> > >
> > > B
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 07:25:28 -0500,
Marc Joliet wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 13:14:23 CET schrieb John Covici:
> > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 06:53:46 -0500,
> >
> > Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
> > > >
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 13:14:23 CET schrieb John Covici:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 06:53:46 -0500,
>
> Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
> > > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
> > >
> > > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > >> [1 ]
> >
> > Your system is somewhat broken
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 06:53:46 -0500,
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>
> >> [1 ]
>
> Your system is somewhat broken I think. You need to look at each
> package and resolve the problem - possibly s
Am Sonntag, 3. Dezember 2017, 21:22:23 CET schrieb Marc Joliet:
> Of course, that doesn't mean that things are correct on your end, though.
> On one of my computers, checksec does say "PIE enabled". Maybe you should
> try compiling something else and verifying it. After all, there's probably
> a
On 04/12/17 17:49, John Covici wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> [1 ]
Your system is somewhat broken I think. You need to look at each
package and resolve the problem - possibly stray entries in one of the
package files or world. Have you done a depclean
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 17:58:53 GMT Simon Thelen wrote:
> On 17-12-03 at 09:52, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2017-12-03 06:46, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions.
> > >
> > > 2. You have installed a package that depend on sys-devel/gcc-5.
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 04:26:09 -0500,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:20:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> > do an emerge -ep world > a
> > edit a to something like below then "bash a" to run it:
> > emerge -v =kde-frameworks/kdelibs4support-5.37.0 && \
> > emerge
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:20:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> do an emerge -ep world > a
> edit a to something like below then "bash a" to run it:
> emerge -v =kde-frameworks/kdelibs4support-5.37.0 && \
> emerge -v =kde-apps/kio-extras-17.08.3 && \
> emerge -v =kde-plasma/user-man
I think you are looking for problems that are not there. Almost
finished recompiling the surface4 pro and have one compile failure I
have not looked at - the original palemoon is still working. The
hibernate to disk just failed so it rebooted from scratch and I could
continue working on it while
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 03:58:40 +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> what could fail, when doing the change to PIE-enabled applications
> on base of the regular updates?
> Compilation may fail, if libs are included and not flagged as to be
> recompiled, which are of the "old standard"...
> What else can fa
41 matches
Mail list logo
