Thanks, digesting it!
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Andrés Becerra Sandoval <
andres.bece...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2017-09-25 6:35 GMT-05:00 Damo Brisbane :
>
>> hi,
>>
>> Can someone point where I might go for parallel @world build, it is
>> really for my own curiositynat this time. Curren
On 2017-09-25 22:24, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> I see a few complaints in this thread, but nobody so far has
> elaborated on the problem they have with this change.
The problem is that if I want to complete the upgrade the way portage
suggests, I have to (newly) allow in and time-consumingly build
2017-09-25 6:35 GMT-05:00 Damo Brisbane :
> hi,
>
> Can someone point where I might go for parallel @world build, it is really
> for my own curiositynat this time. Currently I stage binaries for multiple
> machines on a single nfs share, but the assumption is to use instead some
> distributed file
On 09/25/2017 03:37 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
I see a few complaints in this thread, but nobody so far has elaborated
on the problem they have with this change.
hi,
Can someone point where I might go for parallel @world build, it is really
for my own curiositynat this time. Currently I stage binaries for multiple
machines on a single nfs share, but the assumption is to use instead some
distributed filesystem. So I think I just need a recipie, pointers or
Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 02:33:13 CEST schrieb Rich Freeman:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Blinka wrote:
> >> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
> >
> > I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a
> > --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does s
On Monday, 25 September 2017 4:51:22 AM AEST John Blinka wrote:
> > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
>
> I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a
> --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the
> question. Would love to learn w
7 matches
Mail list logo
