On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:33:56PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote
> Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host
> Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
>
> I've seen a few other mentions of the phenomena I'm about to describe.
> It is not clear to me wh
Neil Bothwick writes:
>> Also ran into a wall trying to use the regular tools like qlist to
>> determine what is in there. I found the list after search a while on
>> google but I'm curious why `qlist' doesn't list off
>> what is in there, like it does in all other cases.
>
> Meta packages don't
On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:54:20 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Neil Bothwick writes:
> >> All the lxde-base pkgs contained in lxde-meta are installed.
> >>
> >> Openbox wm is installed.
> >>
> >> Anyone know what that error message means or how to get around or fix
> >> it?
> >
> > You're missing
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 03:42:24 -0500 taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>>
>> The IOMMU (theoretically) protects the CPU and memory from rogue
>> devices, such as the hard drive.
>
> No. Any DMA capable device can bypass IOMMU. IOMMU was not
> designed to
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:47 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> LXDE on the menu item Preferences ===> Desktop Preferences
>> Nothing can be set there and it does not even show a dialog
>> box... just an error messages that says:
>>
>> Desktop manager is not active
>>
>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:05:29 +0100 Miroslav Rovis wrote:
[...]
> Gentoo Keys
> ---
>
> ### About
>
> Gentoo Keys is a Python based project that aims to manage the GPG keys used
> for validation on users and Gentoo's infrastracutre servers. Gentoo Keys
> will be able
> to verify GPG k
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 03:42:24 -0500 taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> It is possible to have a reasonably secure system where the hard drive
> firmware (or any other devices) can't fuck around with the stuff on
> disk, although I highly doubt that the gentoo infrastructure (and
> kernel.org, and all the so
On 02/03/2017 23:31, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 02:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 22:57, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with
>>> "tun" interfaces.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> ifconfig operates at layer 2.
>> H
On 03/02/2017 02:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 22:57, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with
>> "tun" interfaces.
>
> No.
>
> ifconfig operates at layer 2.
> Hostnames is a dns/resolver concept operating at a much high
On 03/02/2017 03:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with
> "tun" interfaces.
>
> It would be easier to recognize which network is Up or Down.
>
The closest thing I was able to manage is
# ip -r addr show
On 02/03/2017 22:57, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with
> "tun" interfaces.
No.
ifconfig operates at layer 2.
Hostnames is a dns/resolver concept operating at a much higher level.
DNs relies on layer 2 so using rDNS to display h
running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with
"tun" interfaces.
It would be easier to recognize which network is Up or Down.
--
Thelma
On 170302-03:42-0500, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 02/28/2017 12:05 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
>
> > On 170227-21:59-0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Miroslav Rovis
> >> wrote:
...
> > And finally Andrew Shavchenko pointed me to gkeys !
> >
> > Here's the answer to my
On 03/02/2017 05:07 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:44:20 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 06:33, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>> Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host
>>> Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
>>>
>>> I'
Am 2017-03-02 um 13:41 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> try lshw to get that info:
we had that already in the other leg of the thread
doesn't work for me:
# lshw -c disk
*-disk:0
description: SCSI Disk
physical id: 0.0.0
bus info: scsi@1:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sda
On 02/03/17 18:03, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2017-03-01 um 23:21 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>
>> Is there actually a disk on that interface? - I have a system where one
>> sdx allocated to an unused sata port with nothing attached - it returns
>> similar information to yours above - check the
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:44:20 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 06:33, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host
> > Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
> >
> > I've seen a few other mentions of the phenomena I'm
Am 2017-03-01 um 22:42 schrieb Daniel Frey:
> I'm not sure how the sg? -> sd? mapping is supposed to work. I find it
> odd that there seems to be two nodes reported for each sd? entry.
> However, this could be the way the controller driver reports it to the
> kernel...
>
>> 07:01.0 SCSI storage c
Am 2017-03-01 um 23:21 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> Is there actually a disk on that interface? - I have a system where one
> sdx allocated to an unused sata port with nothing attached - it returns
> similar information to yours above - check the other entries.
I checked them, sure.
to me it seems t
On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:47 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> LXDE on the menu item Preferences ===> Desktop Preferences
> Nothing can be set there and it does not even show a dialog
> box... just an error messages that says:
>
> Desktop manager is not active
>
> All the lxde-base pkgs contained
On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:07:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Decided to see what `emerge @preserved-rebuild would bring me.
>
> ran `emerge -va @preserved-rebuild' and I notice that it appears my
> setting in /etc/portage/make.conf for VIDEO_CARDS="virtualbox" is
> being ignored... the output of abo
On 02/28/2017 12:05 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170227-21:59-0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Miroslav Rovis
wrote:
Apologies for my not being able to reply sooner!
On 170227-18:18+0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
And via a new private big business, the Github. Givi
22 matches
Mail list logo
