Daniel Quinn wrote:
> Have any of you seen this before? This is on a fresh install. I
> can't get anything GNOME-based to install as it looks like
> gnome-keyring is bringing in an older version of gtk+ which somehow
> depends on gtk-engines-adwaita which in turn depends on gtk+.
>
> Details:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same
> behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file system.
> Using KMail I can no longer add any attachment to an email nor save an
> existing attach
Have any of you seen this before? This is on a fresh install. I can't
get anything GNOME-based to install as it looks like gnome-keyring is
bringing in an older version of gtk+ which somehow depends on
gtk-engines-adwaita which in turn depends on gtk+.
Details:
* ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64"
* Profi
On 12/10/16 19:15, Mick wrote:
> The OP can mount and have a look in those partitions for any efi
files, which
> would be a give away; or in MSWindows 10, go to Start menu, press and
hold
> the Shift key, and click Restart. Then select Troubleshoot/Advanced
Options
> and check to see if there is a
Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same
behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file system.
Using KMail I can no longer add any attachment to an email nor save an
existing attachment to disk.
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the up
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> I've been getting this output since last night.
>
> Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
> [ebuild U ] x11-libs/libX11-1.6.4 [1.6.3]
> [ebuild U ] x11-libs/libXrende
On Wednesday 12 Oct 2016 11:42:56 Andy Mender wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> You don't mention what is "the prettiest desktop there ever was", but I
> reckon that it's a) a 64-bit PC and b) it's modern enough to have UEFI, not
> the standard BIOS. Therefore, the drive is a GPT-partitioned drive (as
> t
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:24 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> You're correct, Arduino is for tech projects. Not much of an actual
> "computer",
> because both the processor and amount of RAM are too weak. However,
> there is
> a new board that supposedly runs a full-blown FreeBSD 3.x ve
Hello,
> I've looked around at the Raspberry Pi 3
>
> [...]
>
> I would prefer running Gentoo on it
>
> [...]
>
> Any opinions or use cases and stories would be much appreciated.
well I'm running Gentoo on a Raspberry Pi 2. Getting Gentoo basically
running on it wasn't too hard. There's some good
It's hard to follow your contributions to this list because you stick to
top-posting, whereas everyone else keeps their replies and quotations in
conversation order.
Please don't top-post here. Thanks.
On Wednesday 12 Oct 2016 14:24:15 Andy Mender wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> You're correct, Ardu
On 10/12/2016 05:38 AM, Daniel Quinn wrote:
> A while back I looked into a similar setup and was frustrated with the
> hacker-esque nature of these tiny machines. They typically don't come
> with a case, sometimes not even with power, and getting a working Gentoo
> setup was likely going to be an
Dear Daniel,
Wish it was possible to "like" someone's e-mail. Thank you for letting us
know about your endeavors and documenting your efforts :).
Best regards,
Andy Mender
On 12 October 2016 at 14:38, Daniel Quinn wrote:
> A while back I looked into a similar setup and was frustrated with the
A while back I looked into a similar setup and was frustrated with the
hacker-esque nature of these tiny machines. They typically don't come
with a case, sometimes not even with power, and getting a working Gentoo
setup was likely going to be an effort I didn't want to spend.
So I ended up bu
Dear Daniel,
You're correct, Arduino is for tech projects. Not much of an actual
"computer",
because both the processor and amount of RAM are too weak. However, there is
a new board that supposedly runs a full-blown FreeBSD 3.x version. Cannot
find
a link to the blog entry now, sorry :(.
I would
On 12/10/2016 13:56, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> My birthday's coming up in 10 days and my SO and others are wanting to
> know what to get me for my birthday. I'm slowly growing tired of trying
> to keep my desktop Gentoo machine lightweight and "clean", so it'd be
> fun to hack on a little computer t
My birthday's coming up in 10 days and my SO and others are wanting to
know what to get me for my birthday. I'm slowly growing tired of trying
to keep my desktop Gentoo machine lightweight and "clean", so it'd be
fun to hack on a little computer that I could possibly DIY a case or
other arrangement
Dear Daniel,
You don't mention what is "the prettiest desktop there ever was", but I
reckon that it's a) a 64-bit PC and b) it's modern enough to have UEFI, not
the standard BIOS. Therefore, the drive is a GPT-partitioned drive (as
that's UEFI's requirement) and you have a /boot or /boot/efi parti
On Wednesday 12 Oct 2016 10:23:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > For about a week my daily update has complained thus:
> >
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-util/boost-build-1.62*" have
> > been masked. !!! One of the following maske
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> For about a week my daily update has complained thus:
>
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-util/boost-build-1.62*" have
> been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to
> complete your request:
> - dev-util
Hello list,
For about a week my daily update has complained thus:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-util/boost-build-1.62*" have been
masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-util/boost-build-1.62.0-r1::gentoo (masked by: )
(dependen
On 11/10/16 22:47, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> As far as I know, you can’t use UEFI on a msdos partitioned hard drive.
> So… are you not just using an old but known and stable BIOS?
Honestly, that hadn't occurred to me. The BIOS is fancy (lots of colour
and supports a mouse!) and I thought that Wind
21 matches
Mail list logo
