Some time ago (more than a year ago) one of my computers failed to boot
after an update (note - not a kernel update. A @world update.) I
couldn't figure out why and installed grub2 and used UUIDs as a
temporary fix.
I got a new SSD for that machine today, so I went and moved everything
over, then
On 26/05/16 08:19, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
>> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
>> As I've said many times in recent years, my d
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
>> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
>> As I've said many times in recent years, my days of coding expired
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Stroller
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 May 2016, at 5:42 am, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> You are likely right. When I reply here, it looks one way. When I hit
>>> forward before, it seems to behave differently, although it makes no
>>> sense to me why i
On Mon, 23 May 2016 22:08:20 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Jonathan Callen wrote:
> > On 05/23/2016 12:39 AM, Dale wrote:
> >>> --
> >> P. S. I'm not sure how this is going to be formatted. It looks odd
> >> at the moment. :/
> >
> > The magic to getting things like this to format correctly is to
>
On 05/25/2016 06:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Well, considering the importance of gummiboot to some of us, I might be
> willing to take it on - if I just knew a bit more about package maintenance.
> As I've said many times in recent years, my days of coding expired about 25
> years ago, and
On Sunday 22 May 2016 23:39:08 Dale wrote:
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/gummiboot
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:45:55 +0200
> From: Michał Górny
> Reply-To: gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
> Organization: Ge
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 May 2016, at 5:42 am, Dale wrote:
>>
>> You are likely right. When I reply here, it looks one way. When I hit
>> forward before, it seems to behave differently, although it makes no
>> sense to me why it would do that.
>
> The me
Hello,
So I'm working on ebuilds for gentoo for apache-mesos-1.0.
It's an exciting cluster release and it can function as the basis for both
normal cloud needs and those of Hi Performance Computing.
I have a small cluster of amd64 system for this development work.
I want to simultaneously work o
On Wednesday 25 May 2016 09:51:19 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> I have just synced and I have no problems. Are you sure to have masked
> plasma 5 suff?
>
> My masks are:
>
> kde-plasma/*
> kde-frameworks/*:5
> kde-apps/*:5
> kde-misc/*:5
>
> >=kde-apps/kde4-l10n-16.04.1
I didn't actually ha
On 25/05/2016 10:57, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Today I noticed a large number of kde package files being fetched during my
> daily --sync, and then I got this in emerge -auDvU:
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
> "sys-auth/polkit-qt[qt5]".
> !!! One o
> On Tue, 24 May 2016, at 5:42 am, Dale wrote:
>
> You are likely right. When I reply here, it looks one way. When I hit
> forward before, it seems to behave differently, although it makes no
> sense to me why it would do that.
The message you forwarded was in html rich-text.
I presume that
2016-05-25 3:57 GMT-05:00 Peter Humphrey :
> Hello list,
>
> Today I noticed a large number of kde package files being fetched during my
> daily --sync, and then I got this in emerge -auDvU:
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
> "sys-auth/polkit-qt[qt5]".
> !!! One of
Hello list,
Today I noticed a large number of kde package files being fetched during my
daily --sync, and then I got this in emerge -auDvU:
emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
"sys-auth/polkit-qt[qt5]".
!!! One of the following packages is required to complete your reque
14 matches
Mail list logo
