>> On Sunday 13 Sep 2015 19:14:55 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Fedora automatically recognized my
>>> Brother HL-5730 printer and installed printer driver for it.
>>>
>>> I wish Gentoo would be able to do it as well some day.
Gentoo should be already able to do that NOW, it's just a matte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/09/15 15:34, Dale wrote:
> Well, I'd be chicken to have two packages dealing with /dev at the
> same time, although portage says it is not a blocker.
>
> For future reference, I went and dug in this path:
>
> /var/db/pkg/sys-fs
>
> It turned
waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> wraeth wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote:
>>> So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck
>>> is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to
>>> "find" it?? Can
Am 13.09.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Nuno Magalhães:
> Greetings,
>
> If i export/import a zpool, the altroot property is not preserved so
> it always gets mounted at /.
>
> In /etc/init.d/zfs, the import line reads
> $ZPOOL import -c $ZPOOL_CACHE -aN 2>/dev/null || true
> so no -options there.
>
> I've
wraeth wrote:
> On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote:
> > So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck
> > is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to
> > "find" it?? Can I remove it somehow??
>
> I'm not certain, but I believe the -MERGING-* files are left o
waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> The following installed packages are not in the database:
>>>
>>> sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev
>>> --
>>>
>>> Equery gives me this:
>>>
>>> root@fire
waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following:
>>
>>
>> The following installed packages are not in the database:
>>
>> sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev
>> --
>>
>> Equery gives me this:
>>
>> root@fireball / # equery list *stati
wraeth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote:
> > So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck
> > is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to
> > "find" it?? Can I remove it somehow??
>
> I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote:
> So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck
> is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to
> "find" it?? Can I remove it somehow??
I'm not certain, but I believe the -ME
wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following:
> >
> >
> > The following installed packages are not in the database:
> >
> > sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev
> > --
> >
> > Equery gives me this:
> >
> > root@fireball / # equery list *st
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following:
>
>
> The following installed packages are not in the database:
>
> sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev
> --
>
> Equery gives me this:
>
> root@fireball / # equery list *static-dev*
> * Searching for *static-de
Howdy,
I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following:
The following installed packages are not in the database:
sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev
--
Equery gives me this:
root@fireball / # equery list *static-dev*
* Searching for *static-dev* ...
!!! No installed packages matching
On 09/13/2015 04:01 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 13 Sep 2015 19:14:55 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto
>> configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very
>> impressive.
>> Which configuration/program is responsible for
On Sunday 13 Sep 2015 19:14:55 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto
> configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very
> impressive.
> Which configuration/program is responsible for it?
If you are running openrc, then I'm g
Greetings,
If i export/import a zpool, the altroot property is not preserved so
it always gets mounted at /.
In /etc/init.d/zfs, the import line reads
$ZPOOL import -c $ZPOOL_CACHE -aN 2>/dev/null || true
so no -options there.
I've also tried with
zpool import -o altroot=/mnt -o cachefile=/etc/z
After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto
configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very
impressive.
Which configuration/program is responsible for it?
Lately I've installed Fedora core on my old eeepc and I very impressed
with the printer installation. Fed
On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:57:04 Peter Humphrey wrote:
>On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote:
>> I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's
>> automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that
>
>You can switch it on or off, b
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:16:29 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
> On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote:
> >My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to
> >compile systemd-226 today.
>
> Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is
> almost 9 year
Mick writes:
> On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 15:29:25 lee wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Is it possible to create a certificate that doesn't use either but a
>> wildcard only? I don't understand why or how an fqdn/IP in a
>> certificate could or should be relevant at all.
>
> It is relevant because Mozilla will
Fernando Rodriguez writes:
> On Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:29:25 PM lee wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> When creating the certificate, I have used the fqdn the host does
>> actually have and knows itself by (because I needed to fill in the
>> fields, and it seemed most reasonable to use the actual host
Mick writes:
> On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 03:45:26 lee wrote:
>> Mick writes:
>> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote:
>
>> >> What's the solution for a server which can be reached by different fqdns
>> >> and IPs? What if the fqdns and IPs it can be reached by change over the
>> >> lifetime
lee writes:
> Well, I've made a bug report about this:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202128
They suggested to try with seamonkey 2.35. I tried and found that 2.35
(and 2.38 beta) work fine.
--
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons
might swall
On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote:
> I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's
> automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that
You can switch it on or off, but it applies to the whole message. What I do if
I want a line
On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote:
>My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to
>compile systemd-226 today.
Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is almost 9
years old now, and systemd compiles in about 6 minutes:
# genlop -t syste
24 matches
Mail list logo
