On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Franz Fellner
wrote:
> Adam Carter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Franz Fellner
> > wrote:
> >
> > > "Look at" usually means "Read the file" - look at the content ;)
> > >
> >
> > Lets pretend for one minute that i'm a dumbass. In what way would I re
Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Franz Fellner
> wrote:
>
> > "Look at" usually means "Read the file" - look at the content ;)
> >
>
> Lets pretend for one minute that i'm a dumbass. In what way would I read a
> binary executable, and how is that relevant to plugin-container
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Franz Fellner
wrote:
> "Look at" usually means "Read the file" - look at the content ;)
>
Lets pretend for one minute that i'm a dumbass. In what way would I read a
binary executable, and how is that relevant to plugin-container?
"Look at" usually means "Read the file" - look at the content ;)
Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Holger Hoffstätte <
> holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 May 2015 09:54:33 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> >
> > > Is this working looking into? The programs
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Holger Hoffstätte <
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2015 09:54:33 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> > Is this working looking into? The programs generally work ok, so this is
> > more for interests sake.
> >
> > # ldd /usr/lib64/firefox/plug
On Wed, 27 May 2015 09:54:33 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> Is this working looking into? The programs generally work ok, so this is
> more for interests sake.
>
> # ldd /usr/lib64/firefox/plugin-container | grep not
> libmozalloc.so => not found
> libxul.so => not found
This is normal, loo
Is this working looking into? The programs generally work ok, so this is
more for interests sake.
# ldd /usr/lib64/firefox/plugin-container | grep not
libmozalloc.so => not found
libxul.so => not found
# ldd /usr/lib64/thunderbird/plugin-container | grep not
libxul.so => not found
# fi
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 20:08:31 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am 26.05.2015 um 15:53 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> > > Hmmm, well I tried this and it was successful, so I wonder what is
> > > going on with cdrecorder?
> >
> > So you probably have found a bug in cdrecord
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 26.05.2015 um 15:53 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> > Hmmm, well I tried this and it was successful, so I wonder what is going
> > on with cdrecorder?
>
> So you probably have found a bug in cdrecord. Have you tried to
> downgrade cdrtools to check if it works with previ
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:21:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:03 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > > What does "isoinfo -d -i /path/to/file.iso" say about it?
> > >
> > > No, udf says no partition or some such, and iso-info gives
> > >
> > > ISO 9660
Am 26.05.2015 um 15:53 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> Hmmm, well I tried this and it was successful, so I wonder what is going
> on with cdrecorder?
So you probably have found a bug in cdrecord. Have you tried to
downgrade cdrtools to check if it works with previous, preferentially
stable releas
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:21:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:03 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > What does "isoinfo -d -i /path/to/file.iso" say about it?
> >
> > No, udf says no partition or some such, and iso-info gives
> >
> > ISO 9660 image: /audio/grml/grml64-fu
James wrote:
> ccs.covici.com> writes:
>
>
> > I have not checked the hardware, but I did burn the image on another
> > system with another drive and mounted it with the drive in question and
> > as I said, even though I got those errors, the mount was successful.
>
> It might be a good tes
ccs.covici.com> writes:
> I have not checked the hardware, but I did burn the image on another
> system with another drive and mounted it with the drive in question and
> as I said, even though I got those errors, the mount was successful.
It might be a good test to check with other software?
On Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:03 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > What does "isoinfo -d -i /path/to/file.iso" say about it?
> >
>
> No, udf says no partition or some such, and iso-info gives
>
> ISO 9660 image: /audio/grml/grml64-full_2014.11.iso
> Preparer: XORRISO-1.2.2 2012.04.02.1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:47:50 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > > Same boat here. From what I understand, if it is more than 2GBs, it
> > > needs UDF support. No idea if that applies to ISOs to tho.
> >
> > But its an iso, and I can mount the .iso via loop, wh
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 26.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> > OK, I have a bit more info, I managed to burn the CD on another box and
> > when I tried to mount it using this drive, it gave me in the logs
> > May 26 02:41:59 ccs.covici.com kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sr0,
On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:47:50 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Same boat here. From what I understand, if it is more than 2GBs, it
> > needs UDF support. No idea if that applies to ISOs to tho.
>
> But its an iso, and I can mount the .iso via loop, why should it care
> about udf suppor
Am 26.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> OK, I have a bit more info, I managed to burn the CD on another box and
> when I tried to mount it using this drive, it gave me in the logs
> May 26 02:41:59 ccs.covici.com kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sr0,
> sector 942680
> May 26 02:
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> bitlord wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 May 2015 22:27:39 -0400
>>> cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>>
Hi. I am trying to burn an iso image to a cd (maybe its actually a
dvd disk), and it boots without any errors, and I can mount the iso
with the
Dale wrote:
> bitlord wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 May 2015 22:27:39 -0400
> > cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >
> >> Hi. I am trying to burn an iso image to a cd (maybe its actually a
> >> dvd disk), and it boots without any errors, and I can mount the iso
> >> with the loop option, but if I try to mou
21 matches
Mail list logo
