Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, wrote:
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> >> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> >> >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32,
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, wrote:
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> >> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> >> >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, wrote:
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
>> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
>> >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
>> >> > unmerged all the emul_x86
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
> >> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
> >> > bec
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 24 April 2015 21:37:21 CEST, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
> >unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
> >because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
>> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
>> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
>> > because I am a coward), and then it was
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:55:42 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Why do you have to add it for every package?
> > I simply added
> > ABI_X86="32 64"
> > To my make.conf and that was the end of it.
>
> I was thinking of that, but do I really want to have all those extra
> libraries for packa
On 24/04/15 23:00, Andrew Tselischev wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:19:57PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
This happens if you're using graphite optimizations in GCC (by having
them in CFLAGS).
If you're already affected, I posted here a way to repair your system:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/s
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 24 April 2015 21:37:21 CEST, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
> >unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
> >because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
>
On 24 April 2015 21:37:21 CEST, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
>unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
>because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
>emerge @preserved-rebuild which
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
> > because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
> > emerge @preser
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:02:24 PM lee wrote:
>> hydra writes:
>> > You mean the documentation at Gentoo about Xen sucks or the upstream
>> >
>> > documentation? What information are you missing from there? Maybe we can
>> > add the missing pieces for Xen being m
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:03:53 PM lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> >>
>> > I disagree. Been using Xen for over 10 years now and find it very easy to
>> > use. The documentation could be better on the Xen site itself, but there
>> > is plenty of decent docume
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
> unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
> because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
> emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did and ever
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:19:57PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> This happens if you're using graphite optimizations in GCC (by having
> them in CFLAGS).
>
> If you're already affected, I posted here a way to repair your system:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547596
>
>
Actua
Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I
unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them,
because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run
emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did and every time I run that, it
gives me another package to
This happens if you're using graphite optimizations in GCC (by having
them in CFLAGS).
If you're already affected, I posted here a way to repair your system:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547596
Thanks, you make my life easier.
2015-04-23 15:18 GMT-04:00 Mike Gilbert :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Guillaume Poulin
> wrote:
>> I'm currently contributing to a python project still supporting python
>> 2.6. Since python 2.6 is no more in portage tree, I currently have no
>> way to run
J. Roeleveld antarean.org> writes:
> This is one of the reasons why I have given up on genkernel and dracut for
> initramfs creation and now simply build my own and have it integrated
> into the kernel:
> $ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep INITRAMFS_SOURCE
> CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="/usr/src/init
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 07:21:12 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 23.04.2015 18:57, james wrote:
> > Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
> >> On 23.04.2015 17:43, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >>> I will see if I get that figured out ... got to get the kernel-options
> >>> and dracut mod
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 06:38:08 PM symack wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response. Flased the bios to the latest version 1.1.7
> dated 2007.
> Bellow is xen kernel built features:
>
> CONFIG_XEN=y
> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y
> CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM=y
> CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=500
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:03:53 PM lee wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> > On 8 April 2015 14:43:02 GMT-07:00, lee wrote:
> >>hydra writes:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, lee wrote:
> symack writes:
>
> Other than that, unless you really do need full virtualization:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:02:24 PM lee wrote:
> hydra writes:
> > You mean the documentation at Gentoo about Xen sucks or the upstream
> >
> > documentation? What information are you missing from there? Maybe we can
> > add the missing pieces for Xen being more accessible and easier to use
23 matches
Mail list logo
