On Sunday 05 April 2015 21:05:15 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 19:03:43 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> > On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > Do you see anything that is actually broken?
> >
> > Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting sil
On Sunday 05 April 2015 12:24:20 Mick wrote:
--->8
> and then portage proceeds in emerging them. So something must not be
> right with your circumstances, but I am not sure what ...
It has me scratching my head too. Thanks for the report.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Friday, April 03, 2015 8:52:18 AM Stroller wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 April 2015, at 4:37 pm, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> >
> > I prefer it this way. I do not want all the nice easy-to read/edit
> > configuration stuff in /etc/portage encrypted some Windows Registry
> > break-alike.
>
> What's bad ab
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > I think we need to get away from solutions that clutter up
> > configuration in the first place. I'm not under any illusions that
> > this will ever be perfect, but I do think we can do better.
Amen.
> Agreed, but this is about managing the options we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 21:53:35 schrieb Martin Vaeth:
> Moreover, I didn't check before the rebuild, but after
> the rebuild there is no 5.20.1 in @INC.
> (So it might be even the case that the rebuild is *necessary*).
>
Sure about this?
huet
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Minor updates (5.x.y -> 5.x.y+1) do not need any rebuilds
> or reinstallations of modules.
This is at most partially correct:
At least, after the update, the install directories change;
here from
/usr/lib/perl5/{vendor_perl,}/5.20.1
to
/usr/lib/perl5/{vendor_perl,}/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 19:03:43 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > Do you see anything that is actually broken?
>
> Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting silently after being
On 04/05/15 14:57, Jarry wrote:
Hi Gentoo-users,
I have this strange problem: I can not start amavisd because
it is running, and at the same time I can not stop amavisd
because it is not running. How's that possible?
vs4 ~ # /etc/init.d/amavisd start
* WARNING: amavisd has already been starte
Hi Gentoo-users,
I have this strange problem: I can not start amavisd because
it is running, and at the same time I can not stop amavisd
because it is not running. How's that possible?
vs4 ~ # /etc/init.d/amavisd start
* WARNING: amavisd has already been started
vs4 ~ # /etc/init.d/amavisd stop
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Alex Corkwell
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:31:43PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Mick wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 14:19:16 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mick
> wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Do you see anything that is actually broken?
Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting silently after being
given a list of packages to emerge doesn't exactly seem like normal
behaviour to me. It was told "emerge -v1 ...[lis
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:31:43PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 14:19:16 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mick wrote:
> > An observation I've made, is that my log rotation seems to
On Sunday 05 April 2015 13:44:25 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> When I occasionally run into bizarre weirdness like this, I usually wait
> one hour, re-sync and try again. If it still fails, then go looking
> further.
>
> Significant updates to the CVS tree are not atomic and every now and
> then you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 11:50:53 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Hello list,
>
> Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals.
> Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a
> list of 71 pack
On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 16:31:43 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> I guess I have to figure out what the error message shown below is all
> about:
> 501 Not authorised --- Reply not authenticated
This is most likely chrony:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/289231
If logrotate works as e
28 08:33 rc.log-20141228.gz
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 4003 Jan 4 19:51 rc.log-20150104.gz
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 3026 Jan 12 08:57 rc.log-20150112.gz
> > drwxrwx--- 2 rootportage4096 Oct 29 2013 sandbox
> > -rw--- 1 rootroot 6406
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 14:41:12 +0200, lee wrote:
>>>
> On Linux now there's the Magic SysRq Key feature for that.
I always can't remember which keys to press with that, so I have it
disabled.
On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 14:19:16 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 06:39:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Mick wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 04 Apr 2015 20:35:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > > > My porta
On 5 April 2015 14:27:27 BST, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Neil Bothwick
> wrote:
> >
> > Or leave /etc/portage full of cruft and crap and fix any problem it
> may
> > cause later on, when you have even less time ;-)
> >
>
> Hmm, have an hour of free time now, at the cos
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> Or leave /etc/portage full of cruft and crap and fix any problem it may
> cause later on, when you have even less time ;-)
>
Hmm, have an hour of free time now, at the cost of maybe having an
hour less of free time a year from now, maybe.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 06:39:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 04 Apr 2015 20:35:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > > My portage summary logs don't seem to be rotated any more.
> > > >
> > >
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 07:21:01 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > It's like being a teenager again, the longer you leave tidying your
> > room, the longer it takes when your mum makes you do it :)
> >
>
> Don't want to harp on it, but I almost never have to clean my world
> file, and when I do I don't
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 04:41:33 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I got into that situation once, you just need to bite the bullet and
> > work through the output. It's not as bad as it looks as the same
> > entry can cause multiple reports, so once you clean up a couple of
> > entries the output can get signif
On 05/04/2015 11:50, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals.
> Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a
> list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just
> exi
On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 10:50:53 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals.
> Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a
> list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it jus
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 14:41:12 +0200, lee wrote:
>>
On Linux now there's the Magic SysRq Key feature for that.
>>> I always can't remember which keys to press with that, so I have it
>>> disabled.
>> BUSIER backwards.
>>
>>>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> It's like being a teenager again, the longer you leave tidying your room,
> the longer it takes when your mum makes you do it :)
>
Don't want to harp on it, but I almost never have to clean my world
file, and when I do I don't need any tools
Hello list,
Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals.
Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a
list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just
exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of f
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 02:24:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
It seems you can't win with that thing. LOL
>>> You can win, by running it reasonably often and actually doing
>>> something about the output. Ignore a few lines and they soon become a
>>> few more, and then a few mor
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 00:52:30 -0400, Boricua Siempre wrote:
> Geentoo power first quantum super computer in 2101 and power all
> galactic cofederation computers.
> It was first supercomputer to crack secret of time travel in 2307 and
> become self conchious in 2402.
Add this to /usr/portage/profile
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 02:24:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> It seems you can't win with that thing. LOL
> > You can win, by running it reasonably often and actually doing
> > something about the output. Ignore a few lines and they soon become a
> > few more, and then a few more still...
> Thing is,
On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 06:39:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 Apr 2015 20:35:31 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > My portage summary logs don't seem to be rotated any more.
> > >
> > > ls -lt `pwd`/summary.log*
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage por
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 14:41:12 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>>> On Linux now there's the Magic SysRq Key feature for that.
>> I always can't remember which keys to press with that, so I have it
>> disabled.
> BUSIER backwards.
>
>> And when the keyboard is unresponsive, it won't work.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:33:06 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
eix-test-obsolete
>>> Many thanks, it certainly seems to.
>>>
>>> It seems to do a bit more besides, unruly in its verboseness, but I
>>> won't bother trying to interpret the rest of its output.
>> It's one reason I do
34 matches
Mail list logo
