Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread Dale
James wrote: > Dale gmail.com> writes: > >> After I do a major upgrade or --emptytree, I switch to boot runlevel, >> check with checkrestart and restart whatever it reports needs it. >> Generally, switching to boot runlevel catches most everything. > OK, so I emerge checkrestart and ran it. And t

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread James
> > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > After an emerge -e world, a reboot is probably best, another > > > > reason to avoid the unnecessary step of emerge -e world in > > > > the first place. > > This conflict what others have said. Curious. My take is that since > > I updated the major com

Re: [gentoo-user] difficulties with lvm2+systemd+grub2

2014-11-11 Thread wraeth
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote: > Today I've started to play around with systemd but so far I couldn't get > it to boot. I've followed the how to from the gentoo wiki [1], but I > stuck somehow. I found systemd to be rather tricky to implement on some of my

Re: [gentoo-user] difficulties with lvm2+systemd+grub2

2014-11-11 Thread covici
Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote: > Hi List, > > Today I've started to play around with systemd but so far I couldn't get > it to boot. I've followed the how to from the gentoo wiki [1], but I > stuck somehow. > > My configuration: > rootfs is on lvm2 (no encryption or raid). I just use it for bei

Re: [gentoo-user] difficulties with lvm2+systemd+grub2

2014-11-11 Thread Jc GarcĂ­a
2014-11-11 14:56 GMT-06:00 Michael Mair-Keimberger : > This lead me to my second question. At the wiki, the only way to create > an initramfs for systemd was with genkernel (genkernel --udev --lvm). > While the command itself is pretty useless (it's `genkernel --udev --lvm > initramfs` if you want

Re: [gentoo-user] difficulties with lvm2+systemd+grub2

2014-11-11 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 11.11.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Michael Mair-Keimberger: > Don't get confused about the "lvm" flag. This just get passed to my very > simple custom initramfs Why not try dracut for creating your initrd? I spent *lots* of time around lvm/mdadm with systemd and grub2 back then ... What does your o

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 11 Nov 2014 21:03:56 Neil Bothwick wrote: > Why? The compiler is not used by running software. If there was an ABI > change meaning that mixing programs compiled with the two versions would > cause problem, emerge -e would be prudent, but that hasn't happened for a > long time. You don'

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread James
Tomas Mozes shmu.sk> writes: > >> Rebooting catches *everything* even better than --emptytree ? > > After an emerge -e world, a reboot is probably best, another > > reason to > > avoid the unnecessary step of emerge -e world in the first place. > Or you can check the list of processes

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:19:36 + (UTC), James wrote: > Dale gmail.com> writes: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > After an emerge -e world, a reboot is probably best, another > > > reason to avoid the unnecessary step of emerge -e world in > > > the first place. > > This conflict what others

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread James
Dale gmail.com> writes: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> Rebooting catches *everything* even better than --emptytree ? > > --emptytree has nothing to do with rebooting. It simply forces emerge to > > rebuild everything in world and their dependencies. Once you have > > done, you will have daemons

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-Xscreensaver problem

2014-11-11 Thread Andrey F.
I think your best bet is to send that segfault to Nvidia via their Nvidia - driver forums. Seems like a driver bug to me and the nvidia guys are the only ones who can fix it. They'll want to know your kernel version. On Nov 8, 2014 10:50 PM, "Philip Webb" wrote: > Has anyone else seen this or is

[gentoo-user] Re: qwinff: an excellent qt gui front-end for ffmpeg

2014-11-11 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:04:46 + (UTC), James wrote: > > The more folks putting software into ebuilds and making them avaialbe, > > either github or overlay (sunshine) the better off we all are. > Or post them to bgo where they will hopefully get picke

Re: [gentoo-user] how to upgrade postgresql under gentoo

2014-11-11 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 06:26:02 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > I thought gentoo would only give you versions of software that were > considered mainstream upstream, that the ~ was only for the ebuilds. > > J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Monday, November 10, 2014 08:06:50 AM cov...@ccs.covic

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

2014-11-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote > >> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild* >> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with >> instructions on moving to somethin

Re: [gentoo-user] how to upgrade postgresql under gentoo

2014-11-11 Thread covici
I thought gentoo would only give you versions of software that were considered mainstream upstream, that the ~ was only for the ebuilds. J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Monday, November 10, 2014 08:06:50 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Then they should not change the catalog version -- what is that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3

2014-11-11 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:52:09 + (UTC), James wrote: > >>> I'd have thought you needed to emerge -e world if you really want to >>> be protected. >> Yea, maybe. I read the man page on emptytree. I get it actually replaces >> by a "reinstall". Does this do more than if I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: qwinff: an excellent qt gui front-end for ffmpeg

2014-11-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:04:46 + (UTC), James wrote: > The more folks putting software into ebuilds and making them avaialbe, > either github or overlay (sunshine) the better off we all are. Or post them to bgo where they will hopefully get picked up by a dev or a layman overlay. -- Neil Bot