On June 6, 2014 01:27:51 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. Whenever I issue the command shutdown -h now to shutdown the
> system, having booted under systemd, the computer never actually shuts
> down. It does stop some services, but eventually just sits there --
> about the last one I see is som
Hi. I am having some strange performance problems when booted under
systemd. These problems happened a little bit under openrc, but are
much more pronounced with systemd.
I am using just virtual consoles, no gui whatsoever at the moment. I
also use tmux with 4 windows in one of the vcs. My sys
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
> > .., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
> > and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
>
> I bet you have quite a lot of systemd component
Hi. Whenever I issue the command shutdown -h now to shutdown the
system, having booted under systemd, the computer never actually shuts
down. It does stop some services, but eventually just sits there --
about the last one I see is something about sound card state and that is
all, it just waits t
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:56 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experimenting with the C code of the ISAAC pseudo random number generator
> (http://burtleburtle.net/bob/rand/isaacafa.html).
>
> Currently the implementation creates (on my embedded linux) 32 bit
> hexadecimal output.
So it's a 32 bit intege
Hi,
I am experimenting with the C code of the ISAAC pseudo random number generator
(http://burtleburtle.net/bob/rand/isaacafa.html).
Currently the implementation creates (on my embedded linux) 32 bit
hexadecimal output.
>From this I want to create random numbers in the range of [a-Za-z0-9]
*with
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
> .., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
> and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over the wo
On 06/05/2014 11:40 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:15:11 +0200
> "Dutch Ingraham" wrote:
>
>> If you could point me to the proper command set to make the switch,
>> I'd appreciate it.
>
> Remove the overlay (`layman -d mate`) and then do a world upgrade.
>
> It is as simple as t
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Now that’s an interesting idea I haven’t thought of yet. Thanks. My LUKS
> passphrase is much more secure than my ancient user password anyway *hehe*.
>
Only if it isn't the same. :)
In theory neither really need be algorithmically mo
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:24:22AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 21:59:18 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>
> > I encrypt my home partition with LUKS and enter a passphrase
> > during boot. But I always wanted to get decryption upon login running,
> > especially because it woul
Walter Dnes waltdnes.org> writes:
> You may be interested in buildroot http://buildroot.net/ and
> http://buildroot.net/about.html It's nominally aimed at cross-compiling
> for embedded systems, but it looks like it handles just about
> everything. I'm not a developer, so I don't know if thi
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 15:15:11 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>
>
>
>
> If you could point me to the proper command set
> to make the switch, I'd appreciate it.
>
>
Please see if you can switch off HTML when posting to this list.
Check man layman, the delete command is:
layman -d
--
Rega
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:15:11 +0200
"Dutch Ingraham" wrote:
> If you could point me to the proper command set to make the switch,
> I'd appreciate it.
Remove the overlay (`layman -d mate`) and then do a world upgrade.
It is as simple as that, as it'll upgrade all those packages to the
versions th
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 at 8:31 AM
From: "Tom Wijsman"
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:11:31 -0400
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> [nomerge ] mate-base/mate-1.6.0::mate-overlay
You are still using the MATE overlay, which wasn
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 at 8:18 AM
From: "Samuli Suominen"
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower
On 05/06/14 15:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2014
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 12:26:09 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
> >
> > Mick wrote:
> >> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> >> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:11:31 -0400
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> [nomerge ] mate-base/mate-1.6.0::mate-overlay
You are still using the MATE overlay, which wasn't synced up with
the latest changes; make layman sync, but if you want to be really sure
just remove the overlay from layman and use MAT
On 05/06/14 15:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely
unofficial
Gentoo developers a
On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely
>>> unofficial
>>> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-ov
On 06/05/2014 05:40 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:15:22 -0400
> Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>
>> Thanks everybody for your help. I've made the further suggested
>> changes, but I remain with the three hard blocks.
>
> Can you provide the emerge output of the following command?
>
>
On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely
>> unofficial
>> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay
>>
>> Enough said
>>
>> - Samuli
>>
>>
> Sorry, b
On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 05/06/14 02:15, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>> On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
>> O
On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
> Mick wrote:
>
>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
>> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
> For them to hav
On 05/06/14 14:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Greg Woodbury wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the advocates and implementers made some major political
>> choices when they (apparently deliberately) chose to put the systemd
>> stuff in /usr/lib instead of /lib. It was pointed ou
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Greg Woodbury wrote:
> Unfortunately, the advocates and implementers made some major political
> choices when they (apparently deliberately) chose to put the systemd
> stuff in /usr/lib instead of /lib. It was pointed out that this
> abrogated certain parts of the
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick wrote:
> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
For them to have support for sleep and hibernate, someone needs
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 02:34:49 -0400
Greg Woodbury wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 11:11 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> It is a discussion about technological things, yes, but the art of
> dealing with other people *is* politics [1].
Politics are also about dealing with power, not alone people; it is
pos
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 10:08:53 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> >>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> >>> gentoo user will have to switch fr
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 00:27:28 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:15:22 -0400, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>
> > I suppose its now time for an uninstall. Kind of disappointing; we
> > are told Gentoo is about choices, and in fact that's true. I made
> > the choice to use a pure openRC
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:15:22 -0400
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> Thanks everybody for your help. I've made the further suggested
> changes, but I remain with the three hard blocks.
Can you provide the emerge output of the following command?
emerge --tree --unordered-diplay -uDNv @world
This mak
On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
>>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
>>> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>>> want/need to continue using sle
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> > Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> > gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
> > want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
>
> For those t
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
>>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
>>>
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely w
33 matches
Mail list logo
