On 24/02/2014 06:27, Facundo Curti wrote:
Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous.
I want to install RAID on SSD's.
Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The
performance would be something like this:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
writ
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow "the*nix design principles", but being modern and
with the same features (all of them optional, of course) of systemd
24.02.2014 05:07, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[ ...]
We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
giving them message "stuff it, I'm not dealing with this. You called me,
you fix it."
Doesn't sound like good de
Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous.
I want to install RAID on SSD's.
Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The performance
would be something like this:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
writes:
raid1: n
raid0: n*2
But, in real life
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> >
> >> We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
> >> point it occurred, we just chuc
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/02/2014 01:12, Mick wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:11 PM, eroen wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:47:55 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen wrote:
>> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
>
>> We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
>> point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
>> giving them message "stuff it, I'm
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:47:55 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
> >> sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
> point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
> giving them message "stuff it, I'm not dealing with this. You called me,
> you fix it."
Th
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox wrote:
>> Hello,
>> after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
>> sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
>> and unmerge systemd.
>>
>> Now I can't use Banshee which
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox wrote:
> Hello,
> after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
> sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
> and unmerge systemd.
>
> Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the
> next depen
On 24/02/2014 01:12, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>> I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
>>> new trying to follow "the*nix design principles", but being modern and
>>> with th
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:54:07 +0100, Fox wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to compile fltk-1.1.10 both using an ebuild from [1] and
> with just the downloaded source. I think this version needs libpng
> 1.2 which is installed in one of the slots.
>
> Using the source code and cmake with FLTK_USE_SYST
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mick wrote:
[ snip ]
> Well, I'm no authority on this since I can't code,
My point exactly.
> but here's a starter for 10:
>
> http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s06.html
Funny you mention this; the second definition is by Robert Pike, who later said:
"Not
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
> > new trying to follow "the*nix design principles", but being modern and
> > with the same features (all of them optiona
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
>> new trying to follow "the*nix design principles", but being modern and
>> with the same features (all of them optiona
On 02/23/2014 07:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my m
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:59:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Personally, I think portage has gone too far and the complex solutions
> are causing problems that are worse than what they attempt to solve.
> Amzing solutions (like sub-slots) aren't really much use in the real
> world if the package mai
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
> new trying to follow "the*nix design principles", but being modern and
> with the same features (all of them optional, of course) of systemd
> will have more chances; although
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alan,
The easiest method may be to parse the error given:
On 02/23/2014 07:13 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> ###
>>> !!!
>>> Multiple package instances within a single pack
Edward M live.com> writes:
> > I'm looking for an application
> > to create flashcards for study.
> Hello,
> You may want to take a look at anki.
> app-misc/anki
Thanks,
I'll give it a test drive
James
I remember having past a similar problem by this steps:
unmerge it.
try to update and write the offered package choices on corresponding files,
i.e: *.mask/use.
update it with "--newuse" option. Doesn't work, try first installing the
aforementioned package and then update.
It's actually not a bug,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox wrote:
> Hello,
> after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
> decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
>
> Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the next
> dependency
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Mick wrote:
[ snip ]
> I am not sure if people object to the Lennart-way of messing up Linux, under
> the blessings of RHL, or if they just don't like the immediate outcome.
Actually, most people that actually *try* using systemd and reads how
it works have no pro
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, wrote:
[ snip ]
>> Corrupt filesystems or logs?
>
> logs. currently if fsck runs anywhere on boot i get zero log about what
> was done, so i prefer to do this on a running system. / is obviously
> special, so this is a pro that fsck is logged, but of course if /
On 2014-02-23 12:42 PM, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't being lazy. I usually do t
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
> Mick,
>
> You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
> top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
>
> Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't being lazy. I usually do trim my posts, except f
Mick,
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
On 2014-02-22 6:32 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrot
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev.
I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the
next dependency tree:
banshee
<- gnome-base/gnome-settings-daem
On 23/02/2014 18:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Alan.
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
- are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
> message? Perhaps post the entire emerge outpu
Hello,
I am trying to compile fltk-1.1.10 both using an ebuild from [1] and
with just the downloaded source. I think this version needs libpng 1.2
which is installed in one of the slots.
Using the source code and cmake with FLTK_USE_SYSTEM_PNG off it complies
fine. I can see that it automatic
Hello, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> - are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
> >> > message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
> > I tried it again without the -p, and got t
On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> - are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
>> > message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
> I tried it again without the -p, and got the same output.
>
> I think this is a portage bug. At the very least, it's poor
> d
Hey list,
I'm observing on this olde Centrino laptop that emerges take much, much longer
for certain packages than they did in the past. There was a bigger update on
25. Jan (the first since 20. Oct) and another one on 22. Feb. Examples
can be found at the bottom, they show increases from 15 to mo
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 07:01:53 Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> 17.02.2014 00:19, Canek Peláez Valdés пишет:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff
> > wrote: [ snip ]
> >
> >> Isn't there too many "if you believe" and "if you agree"? A church of
> >> systemd? ;)
> >
> > As I said to Tan
Hi, Mick.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:32:42PM +, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > Hi, Gentoo.
> > > I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> > > I got the error message:
>
Hi, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:06:15AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> > I got the error message:
> >!!! Multiple package instances within a single pa
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
> > What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
> > Thanks!
> Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack value. Some weeks ago
> I had a similar problem and could I solve it with
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:16 PM, wrote:
>> OK so because of how much time has been spent arguing about systemd with
>> little technical content, i've spent some time on the freedesktop site
>> reading Lennart's blog and also going through the source to find answers
>> to my questions about the
40 matches
Mail list logo
