Am 03.01.2014 08:34, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> BFQ for both is the recommendation.
>
> But do try it both ways to see how it performs and compare.
sure, thanks.
So I edit my udev-rules (and could leave them away and simply compile
bfq in as default if needed).
On 03/01/2014 09:25, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.01.2014 07:52, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>> On 03/01/2014 00:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> BFQ only for the SSDs ?
>>
>> Yes. The scheduler knows how to deal with SSDs while keeping everything
>> responsive even under load.
>>
>> BFQ seems
Am 03.01.2014 07:52, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On 03/01/2014 00:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> BFQ only for the SSDs ?
>
> Yes. The scheduler knows how to deal with SSDs while keeping everything
> responsive even under load.
>
> BFQ seems a good fit for your workcase - desktop/laptop. For thos
On 03/01/2014 00:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 02.01.2014 23:39, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>
>> Give BFQ a try, set USE=experimental in *-sources to patch the source
>>
>> euses -sf experimental giove further info and links
>
> thanks for the hint ...
>
> edited USE-flags and re-emerging sou
On 03/01/2014 01:02, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please consider a USB "stick" that is unformatted but is to be used by
> multiple people/machines. Ideally your instructions will work for all
> people/os/WM, but if necessary please assume that everyone is running
> gnome under linux
>
>
2014/1/2 Mateusz Kowalczyk
> On 02/01/14 23:02, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please consider a USB "stick" that is unformatted but is to be used by
> > multiple people/machines. Ideally your instructions will work for all
> > people/os/WM, but if necessary please assume that everyo
On 01/01/2014 03:28 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01 2014, walt wrote:
>
>> On 01/01/2014 02:07 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>>> My home desktop has had a seagate external 750GB drive ST3750640cbrk for
>>> a number of years and the disk is starting to fail.
>>
>> Maybe I'm weird or some
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:59:29 +0200, Anton Shumskyi wrote:
> Hi, there is a native queuing at my INTEL SSD 64GB, so i'v set "noop"
> scheduler via udev rules. And it's kind a luggish when deleting a lot files
> like kernel sources (at ext4,xfs,btrfs, FS makes no difference, some cheap
That's the d
Hello!
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:16:22 + (UTC)
james wrote:
> Well, I have not kept up on mp3/wav/ portable players,
> so your input as to a Gentoo friendly device is welcome. A miniture
> video screen is not necessary, and keeping costs down is desired.
> Google for this said device leaves me
On 02/01/14 23:02, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please consider a USB "stick" that is unformatted but is to be used by
> multiple people/machines. Ideally your instructions will work for all
> people/os/WM, but if necessary please assume that everyone is running
> gnome under linux
Well,
Am 02.01.2014 23:59, schrieb Anton Shumskyi:
> And the best guide is at Arch wiki=) As always=)
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drives
been there before ;-)
Hello,
Please consider a USB "stick" that is unformatted but is to be used by
multiple people/machines. Ideally your instructions will work for all
people/os/WM, but if necessary please assume that everyone is running
gnome under linux
1. How should I prepare this device so that it can be plugge
Hi, there is a native queuing at my INTEL SSD 64GB, so i'v set "noop"
scheduler via udev rules. And it's kind a luggish when deleting a lot files
like kernel sources (at ext4,xfs,btrfs, FS makes no difference, some cheap
hardware stuff). Will test some day another scheduler like "deadline" on
top
Am 02.01.2014 23:39, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Give BFQ a try, set USE=experimental in *-sources to patch the source
>
> euses -sf experimental giove further info and links
thanks for the hint ...
edited USE-flags and re-emerging sources ...
BFQ only for the SSDs ?
On 03/01/2014 00:23, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 02.01.2014 23:17, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>
>> Before you test other fs's, do you use BFQ? What IO scheduler do you use?
>
> for SSD(s): noop
> for HDD(s): cfq
>
> both triggered/set via udev-rules
>
>
>
>
>
Give BFQ a try, set USE=expe
Am 02.01.2014 23:17, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Before you test other fs's, do you use BFQ? What IO scheduler do you use?
for SSD(s): noop
for HDD(s): cfq
both triggered/set via udev-rules
On 03/01/2014 00:14, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I am running both my desktop and laptop on SSDs for years now.
>
> I think I got the basic things right:
>
> proper alignment of partitions, scheduler, TRIM (fstrim) ... you know.
>
> Today I received my new and shiny Samsung 840 EVO and migr
I am running both my desktop and laptop on SSDs for years now.
I think I got the basic things right:
proper alignment of partitions, scheduler, TRIM (fstrim) ... you know.
Today I received my new and shiny Samsung 840 EVO and migrated my
desktop to it (writing this very email running Gentoo on
Am 02.01.2014 18:16, schrieb james:
> Well, I have not kept up on mp3/wav/ portable players,
> so your input as to a Gentoo friendly device is welcome. A miniture
> video screen is not necessary, and keeping costs down is desired.
> Google for this said device leaves me with this scant choices:
>
>
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:16:22 + (UTC), james wrote:
> Well, I have not kept up on mp3/wav/ portable players,
> so your input as to a Gentoo friendly device is welcome. A miniture
> video screen is not necessary, and keeping costs down is desired.
> Google for this said device leaves me with this
Well, I have not kept up on mp3/wav/ portable players,
so your input as to a Gentoo friendly device is welcome. A miniture
video screen is not necessary, and keeping costs down is desired.
Google for this said device leaves me with this scant choices:
Sandisk has the Sansa Clip +
Cowon iAudio 10
Tanstaafl libertytrek.org> writes:
> I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
> old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
> pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
googling for "vulnerabilities in php 5.3"
yeilded many interesting links. Her
On Thu, Jan 02 2014, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 01/01/2014 11:07:22 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>> My home desktop has had a seagate external 750GB drive ST3750640cbrk
>> for
>> a number of years and the disk is starting to fail. The system gets
>> only modest usage. It is powered on about 1/
On 01/02/2014 07:46 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
> old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
> pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
>
> Does anyone see any big potential gotchas (major changes) w
On 02/01/2014 15:36, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2014-01-02 8:15 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 02/01/2014 14:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
>>> old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
>>> pin
You can have more than one
Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 02/01/2014 14:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
> >> old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
> >> pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
>
On 2014-01-02 8:15 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 02/01/2014 14:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
Does anyone see any big pote
On 02/01/2014 14:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
> old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
> pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
>
> Does anyone see any big potential gotchas (major changes) with
On 2014-01-02 7:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-01-02 7:38 AM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Try this:
# /etc/conf.d/nfs
Thanks Bill, I will...
But what do I need to restart to test the changes? I'd rather not have
to reboot every time...
Is it just rpcbind? Or do I need to restart nfs/nfsmmou
On 2014-01-02 7:38 AM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Try this:
# /etc/conf.d/nfs
Thanks Bill, I will...
But what do I need to restart to test the changes? I'd rather not have
to reboot every time...
Is it just rpcbind? Or do I need to restart nfs/nfsmmount too? Others?
Thanks... hope I can ge
Hi all,
I have a VM running in the cloud that has an old web/php app (10+ years
old, believe it or not), that still runs fine on apache 2.2.25, but I
pinned php to 5.3 some time ago.
Does anyone see any big potential gotchas (major changes) with php 5.4,
or even 5.5, if I were to upgrade it?
Try this:
# /etc/conf.d/nfs
# If you wish to set the port numbers for lockd,
# please see /etc/sysctl.conf
# Optional services to include in default `/etc/init.d/nfs start`
# For NFSv4 users, you'll want to add "rpc.idmapd" here.
NFS_NEEDED_SERVICES="rpc.idmapd"
# Number of servers to be starte
No one?
Another reboot, and had to open up OUTGOING port 57212 this time.
Why are the static ports I'm assigning not being used?
On 2013-12-31 8:11 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-12-31 7:30 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've made the following changes to the following config files:
/etc/conf.d/nfs
O
On 01/01/2014 11:07:22 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
My home desktop has had a seagate external 750GB drive ST3750640cbrk
for
a number of years and the disk is starting to fail. The system gets
only modest usage. It is powered on about 1/2 the time and the disk
often goes significant periods wi
34 matches
Mail list logo
