Am 10.10.2013 06:45, schrieb Adam Carter:
> There might have been a icmp redirect from 10.96.25.1 telling ipfire that
> there's a better way to get to that network, and its via 10.96.25.2.
>
> On my system it seems to be off by default (I havent set it in
> /etc/sysctl.conf) which makes sense as r
There might have been a icmp redirect from 10.96.25.1 telling ipfire that
there's a better way to get to that network, and its via 10.96.25.2.
On my system it seems to be off by default (I havent set it in
/etc/sysctl.conf) which makes sense as redirects can be used for MITM
attacks.
$ cat /proc/s
On 10/08/2013 09:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> to provide service supervision, which is the main
> feature systemd offers
By supervision do you mean restarting a service after it crashes, for example?
Or something else completely?
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 23:41, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have installed the *binary distribution of scilab* available form its
> > download page.
> >
> > About two months ago, I was using it without problems.
> >
> >
Am 10.10.2013 00:11, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 09.10.2013 22:40, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> While I disabled most of that HPET-stuff (took from my own server here):
>>
>> # zgrep -i hpet /proc/config.gz
>> CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
>> CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
>> # CONFIG_HPET is not se
Am 09.10.2013 22:40, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> While I disabled most of that HPET-stuff (took from my own server here):
>
> # zgrep -i hpet /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
> CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
> # CONFIG_HPET is not set
>
>
> This is quite frustrating already ... but I repeat
On 09/10/2013 23:41, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have installed the *binary distribution of scilab* available form its
> download page.
>
> About two months ago, I was using it without problems.
>
> Now it does not work anymore. Running the binary gives the following
> error mes
Hello.
I have installed the *binary distribution of scilab* available form its
download page.
About two months ago, I was using it without problems.
Now it does not work anymore. Running the binary gives the following
error message:
$ /alt/scilab-5.4.1/bin/scilab
scilab-bin: /alt/scilab-5.4.1/l
On Wed, Oct 09 2013, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 10/09/2013 05:17 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 08 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> That is correct, with 3G physica RAM, you will not benefit from using
>>> PAE at all. I don't think it interferes with anything if you do have it,
>>>
Am 09.10.2013 22:05, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 09.10.2013 21:57, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>
>> go with that dmesg, lspci, kernel config etc pp to lkml. Seriously.
>
> phew ... that sounds like making a fool of myself ... ;-)
> But maybe you are right, thanks.
>
> Considering to tes
Am 09.10.2013 21:57, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> go with that dmesg, lspci, kernel config etc pp to lkml. Seriously.
phew ... that sounds like making a fool of myself ... ;-)
But maybe you are right, thanks.
Considering to test 3.8.13 ... got the IlO to display the console in a
browser ... a
Am 09.10.2013 21:17, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 09.10.2013 20:20, schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
>
>> I would think about a kernel bug first and try with a much lower
>> version.
> Yep. A bit scary with a server which is hundreds of kilometers away.
>
> Got to get that HP IlO-thingy going in my
Am 09.10.2013 20:20, schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> I would think about a kernel bug first and try with a much lower
> version.
Yep. A bit scary with a server which is hundreds of kilometers away.
Got to get that HP IlO-thingy going in my browser(s) ...
S
On 10/09/2013 05:17 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> That is correct, with 3G physica RAM, you will not benefit from using
>> PAE at all. I don't think it interferes with anything if you do have it,
>> I recall a time when RedHat shipped 32 bit kernels th
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Would someone please take a look at this dmesg:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24516209/dmesg.txt
>
> and tell me what those ugly messages around the CPUs could mean?
>
> I still see suboptimal performance on thi
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:13:41 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > I haven't tried xorg-server without xorg-x11 in a while,
> > but lots of those utilities are useful : xkill, xrandr ... .
>
> What are they useful for ? -- I can't do 'man' as they're not installed
> & 'eix' simply shows the same URL for
Am 02.10.2013 18:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Yeah, that's the way to do it. However, kerninst is not for testing
> different configurations of kernels. I suppose you could use it that
> way, but I wrote exactly for the opposite case: when you finally have
> your configuration nailed down, a
Would someone please take a look at this dmesg:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24516209/dmesg.txt
and tell me what those ugly messages around the CPUs could mean?
I still see suboptimal performance on this hardware ...
Thanks!
On Sun, Sep 29 2013, tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
> On 2013-09-29 2:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> I am the OpenRC author/maintainer and a member of base-system. I can
>> tell you that we are not discussing forcing systemd on everyone in
>> Gentoo Linux as a default init system. I can also te
Am 09.10.2013 14:42, schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> On 10/09/2013 06:50 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> Any hints on this?
>> I need a vacation, btw ;-)
>>
>
> What's on 10.96.25.2?
I don't have any idea ... this out of my scope ... some upstream machine
maintained by someone else.
On 10/09/2013 06:50 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Any hints on this?
> I need a vacation, btw ;-)
>
What's on 10.96.25.2?
On 10/09/2013 02:13:41 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
131008 Khumba wrote:
> 131008 Philip Webb wrote:
>> A few days ago, I upgraded to xorg-server-1.14.3 with a lot of
deps.
>> Everything seems to be working normally since then,
>> but a lot of pkgs became unneeded, according to 'emerge -cpv', ie
131008 Khumba wrote:
> 131008 Philip Webb wrote:
>> A few days ago, I upgraded to xorg-server-1.14.3 with a lot of deps.
>> Everything seems to be working normally since then,
>> but a lot of pkgs became unneeded, according to 'emerge -cpv', ie
>> 131005 x11-apps/bitmap-1.0.6 [for xorg-x11 : o
server:
# ip route s
default via 10.96.25.129 dev br0
10.96.25.128/25 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 10.96.25.131
192.168.1.0/24 dev eno2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.201
# !tra
traceroute 172.32.99.12
traceroute to 172.32.99.12 (172.32.99.12), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1
On 2013-09-29 2:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I am the OpenRC author/maintainer and a member of base-system. I can
tell you that we are not discussing forcing systemd on everyone in
Gentoo Linux as a default init system. I can also tell you that I am not
aware of the Gentoo systemd team discussing
On 09/10/2013 10:13, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> * installed at the same time on the same system.
>
> (lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.9.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by
> >=lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.6.1 required
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.9.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
pulled in by
>=lxde-base/lxsession-0.4.6.1 required by
(lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r3::gentoo, installed)
27 matches
Mail list logo
