Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

I had a deeper look into the kernel sources: Your error message is exactly thrown by static bool k8_mc1_mce(u16 ec, u8 xec) So probably you have a K8 ;-) Have a look at: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2007-October/msg00075.html It *might* be an error concerning ECC error correction.

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

I share this opinion. The message says - even if the error was corrected - that there's something dramatically wrong with your - i suppose - CPU. "Corrected error" might imply, that some low-level feature got disabled in order to prevent furher errors. Does this error appear only once at early boo

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

Am 23.09.2013 20:59, schrieb Paul Hartman: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant wrote: >> Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? >> Google wasn't very helpful. >> >> [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. >> [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corr

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

What kind of architecture / CPU? I suppose it's an AMD CPU as this error is thrown by "drivers/edac/mce_amd.c": $ cd /usr/src/linux; fgrep -R "MC1 Error" drivers/edac/mce_amd.c: pr_emerg(HW_ERR "MC1 Error: "); $ fgrep -R "Copyback Parity/Victim error" drivers/edac/mce_amd.c: pr_c

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

>> Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? >> Google wasn't very helpful. >> >> [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. >> [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. >> [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]:

[gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? Google wasn't very helpful. [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]: 0x91

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? > Google wasn't very helpful. > > [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. > [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. > [Hardware Error

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Chromium resubmits forms without prompt

> On both my laptop and my wife's laptop, Chromium is reposting form > data if I click "back" to a form page or if the browser restores a tab > which is a form page. Actually refreshing a form page prompts me as > it should. > > This is pretty dangerous and has caused me quite a few problems. I'v

Re: [gentoo-user] re: scrolling not seamless in firefox/thunderbird

On 09/23/2013 11:46 AM, Joakim Gebart wrote: 2013/9/22 Alexander Kapshuk > On 09/21/2013 06:32 PM, Al wrote: > Bruce Hill wrote: >> I have "Use smooth scrolling" checked and no such wavy line anywhere. > > Hmmm > > I just tr

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

On 2013-09-23 10:37 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, "Tanstaafl" mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org>> wrote: > > Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top post. Please don't be so pedantic... ;)

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, "Tanstaafl" wrote: > > Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top post. After I got LVM2, mdraid, and LUKS working with systemd, I just decided that, for me, neither LVM2, mdraid, nor LUKS are wort

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

On Sep 23, 2013 3:22 AM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote: > > Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > > Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with > > understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-( > > I have now: > > # cat /etc/systemd/system/dev-disk-by\\x2did-

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

Am 23.09.2013 13:00, schrieb Tanstaafl: > Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like > the plague/all the more... I understand that, yes ... it is unnecessary complex from my point of view as well. Swap that is encrypted from scratch everytime you boot up isn't the s

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... On 2013-09-23 4:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with understanding that strang

Re: [gentoo-user] re: scrolling not seamless in firefox/thunderbird

2013/9/22 Alexander Kapshuk > On 09/21/2013 06:32 PM, Al wrote: > > Bruce Hill wrote: > >> I have "Use smooth scrolling" checked and no such wavy line anywhere. > > > > Hmmm > > > > I just tried Firefox, and get the wavy line when "Use smooth scolling > > is checked (scrolling with the mouse

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with > understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-( I have now: # cat /etc/systemd/system/dev-disk-by\\x2did-dm\\x2dname\\x2dswap.swap [Unit] #After=systemd-cryptsetup.service Afte

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

Am 23.09.2013 09:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Yes, I reported this issue back then ... but I don't have the encrypted > swap in /etc/fstab. > > I only have: > > # cat /etc/crypttab > > swap /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M080G2GC_CVPO015404LR080JGN-part5 > /dev/urandom swap,cipher=aes-c

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

Am 21.09.2013 23:49, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > OK, so I conducted another experiment, to see if I was able to make > systemd *not* to work with an exotic combination of underlying > storage. I did the following: > > - 4 drives, all of them in RAID5. > - The resulting /dev/md127 was put in a P