I am doing something sort of similar ... use a routing protocol and set
the metrics to make the LAN more attractive so it will get used over the
wifi. Use dhcp to update dns.
I was using ospf (quagga), dns and ISC dhcp which auto-updates bind.
This is "transparent" to the the hosts, is a pain to
On 05/22/2013 05:01 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi Gentoo community,
>
> I modified apache config to have it running on non-private
> port 8080. I restarted apache and verified that it is
> really listening on port 8080 (netstat). But when I check
> all running apache processes for owners, I see there is s
Hi Gentoo community,
I modified apache config to have it running on non-private
port 8080. I restarted apache and verified that it is
really listening on port 8080 (netstat). But when I check
all running apache processes for owners, I see there is still
one apache process running as root (rest ar
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:35:30PM +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
> Script was just checking (by sftp with public ssh keys for unprivileged
> account) if LAN (eth or wifi) address is up and if not it just assigned
> address to hostname from vpn range (it did not accounted if machine is
> up or down).
Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
> >> one serious problem:
> >> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are represe
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
> > one serious problem:
> > I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
> > local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8)
On 05/22/13 15:35, Samuraiii wrote:
> The only result I got was a script which every 5 minutes checked all
> possible addresses of given machine (my "network" is not big at all -
> only eight machines and one network printer). So checking around 20
> addreses is not big deal - but this approach fe
On 2013-05-22 20:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/22/13 14:30, Samuraiii wrote:
>> I'm sorry for mistake the subnet mask for both spaces IS 255.255.255.0.
>> so it is not overlapping at all.
>> I apologise for my mistake in notation.
>> still this is not (mainly) problem with routing but proble
> On Monday 20 May 2013 11:31:31 Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm looking for a simple HTTP+FTP proxy that supports upstream
authentication.
> The reason is that we (that is, my employer) have a server that requires
Internet access for its setup, but for some reason* my employer does not wan
On 05/22/13 14:30, Samuraiii wrote:
> I'm sorry for mistake the subnet mask for both spaces IS 255.255.255.0.
> so it is not overlapping at all.
> I apologise for my mistake in notation.
> still this is not (mainly) problem with routing but problem with
> assigning name to address.
> If I had super
On 05/22/2013 02:30 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-22 19:52, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
On 2013-05-22 19:52, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
>>> one serious problem:
>>> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 whi
On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
>> one serious problem:
>> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
>> local address space for LA
Hello all,
1. dev-libs/openssl-1.0.1c is current stable version
2. Reliable sources on the postfix list claim c (and d) versions have
'serious' issues:
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> 1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
and
On 2013-05-22 12:38 PM, Quanah Gi
Hi,
I use grml livecd for various recovery/livecd purposes. I just
add an script to my boot partition to compile current zfs. Since it is
debian based it contains installation through aptitude.
Robert.
/boot/zfs # ls
install_zfs* spl-0.6.1.tar.gz zfs_create zfs-0.6.1.tar.gz
/boot/zfs # cat
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
> one serious problem:
> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
> local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8).
Thi
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8).
Every host has its own address "suffix" (eg. host fo
Dale wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
>>> Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connection to the
>>> internet. If I open Firefox, it works fine. I can ping in
On 05/22/2013 09:51 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 21/05/2013 23:36, Dale wrote:
>> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connecti
On 21/05/2013 23:36, Dale wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
>>> Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connection to the
>>> internet. If I open Firefox, it works
20 matches
Mail list logo
