On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 07:26:54PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> > Post package.use please.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
>
> Also, what version of portage are you using?
>
> Note that I've never seen this message and other than adds and deletes
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:26:54 -0700
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question about updating /etc/portage/package.use
> From: markkne...@gmail.com
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I ran "emerge -p --deep --update world" on a machine, and got...
>>
>>
>> * IMPORTANT: config file '/etc/portage/pac
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I ran "emerge -p --deep --update world" on a machine, and got...
>
>
> * IMPORTANT: config file '/etc/portage/package.use' needs updating.
> * See the CONFIGURATION FILES
I ran "emerge -p --deep --update world" on a machine, and got...
* IMPORTANT: config file '/etc/portage/package.use' needs updating.
* See the CONFIGURATION FILES section of the emerge
* man page to learn how to update confi
On Wed, Oct 17 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:18:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
>> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
>> up.
>>
>> I believe the basic idea was to u
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:54:16 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> qlist -ICv | sed -e 's/^/~/' -e 's/-r[1-9]$//'
> >/etc/portage/package.use/goingstable
That should, of course, be package.unmask, not package.use.
--
Neil Bothwick
This chicken has no beak, said Tom impeccably.
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:18:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
> up.
>
> I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
> stable catc
Am 17.10.2012 22:18, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
> up.
>
> I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
> stable catches up, remove
A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
up.
I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
stable catches up, remove the unmasks. I also believe there was some
automated wa
Datty wrote:
Hi all,
I have an issue with a remote server that keeps losing access to the
network. I've managed to replicate the issue by pulling a large file
from the server at full speed (100mbit). It will cut out during the file
copy and the log will show the following:
Oct 17 17:47:26 eric
Hi all,
I have an issue with a remote server that keeps losing access to the
network. I've managed to replicate the issue by pulling a large file from
the server at full speed (100mbit). It will cut out during the file copy
and the log will show the following:
Oct 17 17:47:26 eric kernel: WARNING
12 matches
Mail list logo
