> I'using CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe -msse4.1"
>
> Firefox builds with success for me. gcc is 4.5.3 for me. It's strange.
> I had a similar problem but it had a bad kernel configuration. When I have
> this problem it's gcc receive SIGSEV signal.
> I don't think that you have the same problem li
On Feb 8, 2012 2:38 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9
Hello,
I am trying to recover MySQL databases (which were properly shut down)
from an EXT4 formatted hard disk. I loaded the SystemRescueCD distro
that you can get online and when running TestDisk I can see the
partitions but I cannot recover said partitions because it tells me the
structure
On 02/07/12 15:08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:46:04 -0600
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>> Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in
>>> portage's set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that
>>>
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:46:04 -0600
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in
> > portage's set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that
> > described operators like + - / that let you add,
Am 06.02.2012 22:33, schrieb Grant:
> I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's
> completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile
> doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS="-j1" in
> /etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my HD by letting
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's
> set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that described
> operators like + - / that let you add, remove and replace named atoms
> in a set file.
Portage document
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
> >
> > Yes, it should be OK as long as you run
> > etc
Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's
set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that described
operators like + - / that let you add, remove and replace named atoms
in a set file.
I use the enlightenment-niifaq overlay which ships with some awesome
predfined
On 02/07/2012 09:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, "walt" mailto:w41...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Now that Pandu has mentioned it, I can edit the google-chrome
ebuild to do what I want :) The part where I install the obsolete
libpng12 in the /opt/google/chrome directory instead o
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
Postfix daemons now live under /usr/libexec/postfix
(not under /usr/lib{,64)/postfix).
I'm curious - is there a good reason for this change?
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
Yes, it should be OK as long as you run
etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar after the upgrade.
I was concerned about this at
On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, "walt" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> > On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt wrote:
>
> > > I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired
> > > of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild
> > >
On 02/07/2012 08:57 AM, walt wrote:
However, the newer google-chrome package forces the downgrade of libpng
to libpng12 for the entire machine
Damn, fooled again by the ebuild message after installing libpng12 :(
The post-install message announces that I now need to run revdep-rebuild
to fix
On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
>
> Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar
> after the upgrade. Postfix daemons now
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt wrote:
> > I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired
> > of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild
> > was removed a while ago, I'm guessing because of lib
>> Is your RTC driver compiled into the kernel?
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE="rtc0"
Those have nothing to do with the RTC *driver*.
AFAIK on a PC the relevant option is
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS
andrea
I'using CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe -msse4.1"
Firefox builds with success for me. gcc is 4.5.3 for me. It's strange.
I had a similar problem but it had a bad kernel configuration. When I have
this problem it's gcc receive SIGSEV signal.
I don't think that you have the same problem like me.
I te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.02.2012 17:25, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone built or installed SE-android onto a Sumsung Nexus (or
> similar) cell phone, using a Gentoo development environment?
>
> http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/SE-Android-publicly-released/?
19 matches
Mail list logo
