Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: > On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote: > > On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: > >> > >>> While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up t

Re: [gentoo-user] Please change this subject line.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 1/19/2012 08:26 PM, Dale wrote: > Ohhh, great, something is to make sure to fix when quoting. O_O > > You live in the USA? If yes, mind a off list question? > > Dale > > :-) :-) Yes I do live in the USA, and no I don't mind an off-list ques

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On 19 January 2012 19:25, Dale wrote: > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >> On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale wrote: >>> Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale wrote: > Well, the USE flag got changed.  Isn't that what -N is supposed to do? -N == --newuse not --changed-use :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Dale wrote: > I don't have mine set up to sign them all. I did a couple to see if it > worked or not. Whenever I sign a message, it asks for the password. It > is quite a long password and I don't want to type it in every time I > send something. If you use gpg-a

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale wrote: >> Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >>> On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale wrote: Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do? >>> >>> -N == --newuse not --changed-use :-) >>> >>> It's exactly for this reason that I use

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale wrote: > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >> On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale wrote: >>> Well, the USE flag got changed.  Isn't that what -N is supposed to do? >> >> -N == --newuse not --changed-use :-) >> >> It's exactly for this reason that I use --changed-use and not >> --new

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale wrote: >> Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do? > > -N == --newuse not --changed-use :-) > > It's exactly for this reason that I use --changed-use and not > --newuse. See the man page for the details. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Public key cryptography... (Used to be: Something about SOPA and PIPA)

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:36:56 -0500, Chris Walters wrote: > > GCHQ, as mentioned above :) > > GCHQ, eh? What does that stand for, or is that a State secret? Like > the NSA = "No Such Agency"... Going back to the start of this thread, Wikipedia's back on so you can look it up :P It's Governme

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

Mick wrote: > On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote: >> Chris Walters wrote: > >> I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but >> people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check >> with a picture ID that matches. :/ > > Better than that. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Please change this subject line.

Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote: >> Matthew Finkel wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale >> > wrote: >>> >>> Mud is clearing up a bit. >>> >>> Excellent! Lookin good! > > When he quoted your message, he included par

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: GPG Signatures

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote: > > Matthew Finkel wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale >> > wrote: > >> > >> Mud is clearing up a bit. > >> > >> > >>> Excellent! Lookin good! > > When

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Dale wrote: > Matthew Finkel wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale > > wrote: > > > > Mud is clearing up a bit. > > > > > >> Excellent! Lookin good! > > > > > > Well, I get this on top of your message: > > Error - N

Re: [gentoo-user] Public key cryptography... (Used to be: Something about SOPA and PIPA)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 1/19/2012 07:27 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:28:04 -0500, Chris Walters wrote: >> Possible, but not too likely*. RSA keys are based on two very large >> prime numbers and their composite. The two primes are hundreds of >> di

Re: [gentoo-user] Public key cryptography... (Used to be: Something about SOPA and PIPA)

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:28:04 -0500, Chris Walters wrote: > >> I feel very confident saying "no known way" as cracking that > >> puzzle has been the Holy Grail of maths prizes for 40 years and > >> no-one has announced success. Seeing as mathematicians are a vain > >> lot, and the one that accompli

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale wrote: > Well, the USE flag got changed.  Isn't that what -N is supposed to do? -N == --newuse not --changed-use :-) It's exactly for this reason that I use --changed-use and not --newuse. See the man page for the details.

Re: [gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Mick wrote: >> On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl >>> wrote: >>> > I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote: > Chris Walters wrote: > I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but > people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check > with a picture ID that matches. :/ Better than that. Readers (all that have acce

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > On 19 January 2012 14:28, Dale wrote: >> Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In "man emerge" I read: >>> >>> --changed-use >>> Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have >>> changed since installation. This option also implies the --selectiv

Re: [gentoo-user] Please change this subject line.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote: > Matthew Finkel wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale > > wrote: >> >> Mud is clearing up a bit. >> >> >>> Excellent! Lookin good! When he quoted your message, he inclu

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

Matthew Finkel wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale > wrote: > > Mud is clearing up a bit. > > >> Excellent! Lookin good! > > Well, I get this on top of your message: Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found What's wrong with that? You

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mud is clearing up a bit. > Excellent! Lookin good! > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > - -- > I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood > or how you interpreted my words! > > M

Re: [gentoo-user] Public key cryptography... (Used to be: Something about SOPA and PIPA)

On 1/19/2012 06:00 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single >> private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your >> bank). I feel very confident saying "no known way"

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote: >> Chris Walters wrote: >>> >>> This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and >>> expired key to sign my messages, lately. >>> >>> Chris >>> >> >> >> I have a question now.

Re: [gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl >> wrote: >> > I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but >> > every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache... >

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600 Dale > wrote: > >> Chris Walters wrote: >>> On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: > While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email > set up to

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 22:44:12 Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote: > > I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to > > it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope my reply was too. My > > question is this. How do you make a email that only t

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On 19 January 2012 14:28, Dale wrote: > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In "man emerge" I read: >> >> --changed-use >>   Tells  emerge  to  include  installed packages where USE flags have >> changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective >> option. Unlike --newuse, th

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

Paul Hartman wrote: > There are basically 2 things PGP/GPG normally does for emails: signing > and encrypting. They are not mutually exclusive. > > Signing (like you see on a lot of messages on this list, for example) > is about the person who SENT the message. It lets you verify that the > pers

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single > private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your > bank). I feel very confident saying "no known way" as cracking that > puzzle has been the Holy Grail

Re: [gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl >> wrote: >> > I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but >> > every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache... >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2012-01-19, Michael Mol wrote: > >> Indeed. Other reasons to avoid using LL addresses unless necessary: >> What if the MAC address on the server changes? > > It won't.  It's an embedded device with a hard-wired MAC that the user > can't c

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dale wrote: > Chris Walters wrote: > > This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired > key to > > sign my messages, lately. > > > > Chris > > > I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to > it, off list, and it

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote: > Chris Walters wrote: >> >> This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired key to >> sign my messages, lately. >> >> Chris >> > > > I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to > it, off list, and it was encry

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600 Dale wrote: > Chris Walters wrote: > > On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: > >> > >>> While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set > >>> up to encrypt and decrypt emails?

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dale wrote: > Chris Walters wrote: >> On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: >>> While on this subject, sort of.  Who on here as their email set up to encrypt and decrypt emails?  I want

[gentoo-user] fonts in gitview

Hi, can anybody tell me, what font is used by gitview in the diff pane and how to configure it? I did not use gitview for some time and cannot say, when this started, but currently I get some kind of strange script font that is hardly readable. I am normally working in a KDE4 environment. Than

Re: [gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but > > every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache... > > > > Does anyone know of a decent tutorial written s

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > Hi all, > > In "man emerge" I read: > > --changed-use > Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have > changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective > option. Unlike --newuse, the --changed-use option does not trigger > reins

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: >> >>> While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to >>> encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST. >> >> Well, if you had

[gentoo-user] Re: Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On 2012-01-19, Michael Mol wrote: > Indeed. Other reasons to avoid using LL addresses unless necessary: > What if the MAC address on the server changes? It won't. It's an embedded device with a hard-wired MAC that the user can't change. > What if your network grows to have hundreds of clients?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On 19 January 2012 13:30, »Q« wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:09 -0800 > Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > >> In "man emerge" I read: >> >> --changed-use >>   Tells  emerge  to  include  installed packages where USE flags have >> changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective >> op

[gentoo-user] Re: Portage option "--changed-use" not working?

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:09 -0800 Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > In "man emerge" I read: > > --changed-use > Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have > changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective > option. Unlike --newuse, the --changed-use option

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: >> >>> While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to >>> encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.

[gentoo-user] Netbeans 7.0.1 and 7.1 fonts

Dear All, I'm totally lost in settings especially fonts and Netbeans! So, I'm using Netbeans to develop my java things. Version 7.0.1. looks beautiful because it uses Ubuntu fonts. As far as I know Netbeans gets this font information, I'm speaking about the window fonts and not about the editor f

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: > >> While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to >> encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST. > > Well, if you had signed your mail, then I co

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote: > While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to > encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST. Well, if you had signed your mail, then I could write you encrypted. :) -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 05:29 AM, Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote: >> Hello! >> >> From what I know for sure, many people in different countries >> supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that >> this is not just a US problem. If it happens there,

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards >>> wrote: How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts?

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards >> wrote: >>> How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? >>> >>> For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Felix Kuperjans wrote: > AFAIK, link-local addresses shall not be used for usual services like > HTTP. They are only for neighbour discovery, local multicasts (all local > NTP servers, all local DHCP servers, and so on) or pinging. In a well-maintained network, u

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards > wrote: >> How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? >> >> For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1, >> but I can't figure out how to put that addr

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

AFAIK, link-local addresses shall not be used for usual services like HTTP. They are only for neighbour discovery, local multicasts (all local NTP servers, all local DHCP servers, and so on) or pinging. It is possible (by specifying %interface) to access them, but this remains unimplemented in mos

Re: [gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but > every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache... > > Does anyone know of a decent tutorial written specifically to those who have > an ok (but not hugely in-depth)

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? > > For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1, > but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can > access it by name. Just put the a

[gentoo-user] Good 'layman' tutorial on IPv4 > IPv6?

I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache... Does anyone know of a decent tutorial written specifically to those who have an ok (but not hugely in-depth) understanding of IPv4, and doesn't get bogged down in to

Re: [gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

Grant Edwards wrote: > How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? > > For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1, > but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can > access it by name. Tried several different approaches, can't get a

[gentoo-user] Link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? in browsers?

How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts? For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1, but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can access it by name. Similarly, how do you enter an ipv6 link-local address in Firefox or Opera? c

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout. Fixing.

On 1/19/2012 06:58 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > If by "fix" you mean "wage war on and shoot", then yes :-) > > It seems like that is the only method humanity uses to fix it's > governments that go toxic - witness the last year's events in that part > of the world that has lots of desert By "fix" I

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:03:29 -0500 Chris Walters wrote: > On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote: > > im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment > > thing. > > True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own > - I am pretty certain that most gove

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote: > im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing. True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own - I am pretty certain that most government officials are from another planet. Besides, isn't it up to humani

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:11:24 +0530 Yohan Pereira wrote: > On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good. > > > > Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good > > im fairly certain it was humanity that started this who

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good. > > Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing. -- - Yohan Pereira

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 01:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good. > > Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good. Agreed. Chris --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 120118-1, 01/18/2012 Tested on: 1/19/2012 5:30:31

Re: [gentoo-user] S.O.P.A and P.I.P.A and the blackout.

On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote: > Hello! > > From what I know for sure, many people in different countries > supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that > this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can easily be > repeated anywhere. And the point