> I believe it uses the browser's setting as default.
Yeah that appears to be it, but you have a restart FF for CM to pick
up the new setting.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> "Cookie Monster" is great, it's what I use. If you're familiar with
>> the NoScript or RequestPolicy add-ons, it operates very much the same
>> way. It lets you have fine-grained control over which cookies you
>> allow or block, and you can a
> "Cookie Monster" is great, it's what I use. If you're familiar with
> the NoScript or RequestPolicy add-ons, it operates very much the same
> way. It lets you have fine-grained control over which cookies you
> allow or block, and you can allow cookies from a site for this
> browsing session only.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> I'd like to whitelist sites to allow their cookies to stay
> permanently, then have all other sites cookies deleted upon browser
> close. Can anyone recommend a cookie manager?
"Cookie Monster" is great, it's what I use. If you're familiar wi
I'd like to whitelist sites to allow their cookies to stay
permanently, then have all other sites cookies deleted upon browser
close. Can anyone recommend a cookie manager?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> ifplugd or netplug.
>
> This is the better option IMO.
Or skip the net config/init scripts stuff and just use something like wicd.
> ifplugd or netplug.
This is the better option IMO.
On Sep 26, 2011 6:37 AM, "Mark Knecht" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Florian Philipp
wrote:
> > Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> >> Hi,
> >>Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
> >> to connect to a WEP2 home network?
> >>
> >>If got
On 25 September 2011, at 21:21, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> …
>> At the moment there are very mixed feelings about Unity. There are a good
>> number of people who hate it, but there are some others who say "I love it,
>> except that I hate that it doesn't let me move the menu bar". Because Un
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
>> to connect to a WEP2 home network?
>
> Do you mean WPA2 or WEP? AFAIK there's no such thing as WEP2.
>
>
Ye
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
>> Hi,
>> Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
>> to connect to a WEP2 home network?
>>
>> If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
>> al
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
> to connect to a WEP2 home network?
Do you mean WPA2 or WEP? AFAIK there's no such thing as WEP2.
On 25 September 2011, at 23:17, Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
> …
> I think the important thing, for me anyway, is not the general user
> community, but the "open source" development community. Most of those
> people reluctant to sign their code over to another organization.
None of this has got any
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Stroller
> wrote:
>> The end users do not give a monkey's uncle about the CLA. They just want to
>> use the software, and our distro already provides Sun Java binaries, Unreal
>> Tournament and stuff
On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 21:59:05 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> > Hi,
> >
> >Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
> >
> > to connect to a WEP2 home network?
> >
> >If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 20:54 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> The end users do not give a monkey's uncle about the CLA. They just
> want to use the software, and our distro already provides Sun Java
> binaries, Unreal Tournament and stuff under all sorts of licenses. If
> people want to use it, and it's in
Am 25.09.2011 22:38, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> Hi,
>Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
> to connect to a WEP2 home network?
>
>If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
> all sorts of ESSIDs but so far I cannot figure out how to give it
Hi,
Can anyone supply an example of correctly setting up wpa_supplicant
to connect to a WEP2 home network?
If got the modules installed and the hardware telling me it sees
all sorts of ESSIDs but so far I cannot figure out how to give it the
password correctly. I've been trying to follow thi
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 25 September 2011, at 17:05, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> …
>> But with Unity the problem is much more than being pushed before time:
>> Unity is a project sponsored by Canonical, and if you want to
>> contribute code to it, you need to sign
On 25 September 2011, at 17:05, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> …
> But with Unity the problem is much more than being pushed before time:
> Unity is a project sponsored by Canonical, and if you want to
> contribute code to it, you need to sign a "Contributor License
> Agreement" (CLA), …
>
> … I
On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 16:37:48 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 25.09.2011 12:53, schrieb Mick:
> > I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
> >
> > # fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
> >
> > * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
> >
> > cat: ld
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, James Broadhead
wrote:
> On 25 September 2011 03:15, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> It's stunning to know that something that's shipped by default with
>> Ubuntu sucks so much? Canonical surely must have gone haywire.
>
> It wouldn't be the first time that they've
On 09/25/2011 03:53 AM, Mick wrote:
> I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
>
> # fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
> * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
> cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
> * [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
Am 25.09.2011 12:53, schrieb Mick:
> I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
>
> # fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
> * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
> cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
> * [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
I updated gcc and when I ran fix_libtool_files.sh I get this:
# fix_libtool_files.sh i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
* Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory
* [1/5] Scanning /lib ...
* [2/5] Scanning /usr/lib ...
* [3/5] Sca
On 25 September 2011 03:15, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> It's stunning to know that something that's shipped by default with
> Ubuntu sucks so much? Canonical surely must have gone haywire.
It wouldn't be the first time that they've effectively tested software
by pushing it out to their user-base
26 matches
Mail list logo
