What I meant was: If you're going to 'take over' maintenance, be ready
for bug reports and 'suggestions' from other users. That will require
some effort ;)
Anyways, glad to see people picks up when upstream disappears from the radar.
Rgds,
On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 0
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:26:36AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> (Please forgive my top-posting)
>
> Commendable effort, my friend. Have you tried asking in the gentoo-dev ML?
>
> Rgds,
>
No effort at all. The program helps and makes my life easier a lot.
Yes, i also asked the gentoo-dev.
regard
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 07:52:35AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/07/2011 05:14 AM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
>
> No. There's no upstream for it anymore. Packagers maintain their own
> versions and fixes are not contributed
On 08/07/2011 05:14 AM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
Greetings,
Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
No. There's no upstream for it anymore. Packagers maintain their own
versions and fixes are not contributed upstream since there's no upstream.
(Please forgive my top-posting)
Commendable effort, my friend. Have you tried asking in the gentoo-dev ML?
Rgds,
On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
> I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for the
> su
Greetings,
Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for the
sun, ibm, hp and intel compilers.
I pushed the current version to https://github.com/dgoncharov/colorgcc.
You can pull from there or i can submit a set of patches.
reg
On Friday 05 Aug 2011 23:08:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:59:00 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Yes, this was introduced in 3.8.0 to fix security issues [1]. Change
> > your config to look like this:
> > /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log {
> > su portage portage
> > ...
> > }
>
On 08/06/2011 12:29 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to redirect /var/log/emerge.log to pipe.
> I removed original log-file and created pipe with the same
> name & permissions, but potrage does not write logs there.
> Instead, it just issues message:
>
> emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek
>
On 08/05/2011 03:51 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to be a good gentoo netizen by nfs-sharing /usr/portage between
>> my three local gentoo machines, and failing :(
>>
>> After weeks of fiddling, I discovered today that my problems come from
>> using a 32-bit machine to serve my two 6
Hi,
I'm trying to redirect /var/log/emerge.log to pipe.
I removed original log-file and created pipe with the same
name & permissions, but potrage does not write logs there.
Instead, it just issues message:
emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek
Where is the problem? Is it actually possible to red
On Friday 05 Aug 2011 20:37:12 Daniel Troeder wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 07:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Zenmap - part of net-analyzer/nmap can do that for you.
There is also net-misc/lanmap not sure how effective it is.
--
- Yohan Pereira
"A man can do as he will, but not will as he will" - Scho
11 matches
Mail list logo
