On 2011-05-06, Dale wrote:
> P. S. One would think a Gentoo system could sit idle for a couple
> months without this sort of mess.
It depends on which "couple of months" you happen to pick. ;)
Most of the time "a couple months" is OK. Once in a while there will
be several major updates for d
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 02:10:01AM +0200, Indi wrote:
>
> Speaking of that, I always get that notice "the PGP signature could
> not be verified" on your mails, Neil.
>
Never mind, sorry -- that was my configuration needed updating.
--
caveat utilitor
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:34:29 -0400, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
>
> > [application/pgp-signature (490 bytes)]
>
> Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
> the only point of signing your mails is to cause m
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Dale wrote:
On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
next.
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
the po
Dale writes:
> Dale wrote:
> > On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
> > next.
> Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
> complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
> the point where I have to reinstall?
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote:
AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of
breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library
versions;
they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept
around and should be manually deleted
Dale wrote:
On the list of things to do. Running python-updater now will run that
next.
Thanks.
Dale
:-) :-)
Well, this ain't good. Neither python-updater nor revdep-rebuild can
complete. Either it is a missing package or some other error. Am I to
the point where I have to reinsta
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
> the only point of signing your mails is to cause mailers to slow down
> while trying to check a signature against an unavailable key.
I know what you mean. I h
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:57:36 Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > 2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy
> >
> > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > > > Attached to this message are the contents of the afforementi
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
>> 2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy
>>
>> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Attached to this message are the contents of the afforem
On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:34:29 -0400, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> [application/pgp-signature (490 bytes)]
Kevin, can you upload your PGP/GPG key to a public keyserver, otherwise
the only point of signing your mails is to cause mailers to slow down
while trying to check a signature against an unavailabl
On Friday 06 May 2011 18:04:31 John Nielsen wrote:
> Doesn't look like this went through the first time; re-sending without
> attachment.
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
> >> I am trying to set up a 5GHz wireless access
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:25:31PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> 2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy
>
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached to this message are the contents of the afforementioned file,
> > > thanks for the help!!!
This seems like
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
>
> Attached to this message are the contents of the afforementioned file,
> thanks for the help!!!
Hmm... It looks like libtool is being called to link the library when
DESTDIR is set. It shouldn't be set during the compile phas
Doesn't look like this went through the first time; re-sending without
attachment.
On May 5, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
>> I am trying to set up a 5GHz wireless access point on an Alix 3d2 board with
>> an AR9220 (ath9k "Merlin"
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Andrea Conti wrote:
> > The access permission to
> > /usr/lib64/php5.3/bin/php-cgi is 755, so I think everyone can execute
> > it. Then, what is the problem?
>
> Most probably, the nginx user cannot access the .php file you're trying
> to execute, either because of
2011/5/6 Kevin McCarthy
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:32:50PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
> > persists :(
> >
> > 2011/5/5 Stroller
> >
> > >
> > > On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:32:50PM -0300, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
> persists :(
>
> 2011/5/5 Stroller
>
> >
> > On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > The thing is that emerging mirrorselect
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Lorenzo Marussi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for your reply,
>
> I check that I didn't mixed QT version,
> first I tried with 4.7.2, than I unmerged all qt packages and I tried 4.7.3
> .
> every time after emerging I checked system consistency with revdep-rebuild
I successfuly installed lafilefixer and then ran it, however, the problem
persists :(
2011/5/5 Stroller
>
> On 5/5/2011, at 3:00am, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
>
> ...
> The thing is that emerging mirrorselect has the following outcome:
>
> * QA Notice: libdialog.la appears to contain PORTAGE_TMPD
Hello,
thank you for your reply,
I check that I didn't mixed QT version,
first I tried with 4.7.2, than I unmerged all qt packages and I tried
4.7.3 .
every time after emerging I checked system consistency with revdep-rebuild.
Now I unmerged all, emerged all QT packages (4.72) with "debug" u
On 05/06/2011 12:45 AM, Dale wrote:
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler works... no
I know you have it fixed now, but just thought I'd mention that
you will see the same error when compiling something in a directory
where you don't have write privileges.
On 2011-05-05, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-05-05, Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> It finished emerging, and everything works exactly as expected. The
>> new templates (and old ones) all show up inside the program
>> automatically, no problems at all. The Sun templates are shown when I
>> do an "equer
On 05/06/2011 11:52 AM, Evgeny Bushkov wrote:
> Try to add USE_PYTHON="2.5 2.7" to your make.conf. After that rebuild
> your package.
.. using app-admin/python-updater !
Sebastian
Hi, Alan.
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:06:52PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:22 on Sunday 01 May 2011, Alan Mackenzie
> did opine thusly:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > Could somebody please help me with a printing problem.
> > With a piece of sheet music downloaded from
On Fri, 6 May 2011 11:03:47 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > Portage should run lafilefixer on its own these days. The fixlafiles
> > is one of the default FEATURES.
Portage has its own code for this, lafilefixer can be uninstalled.
>
> I only read of that on this list in the last few weeks, so had a
> The access permission to
> /usr/lib64/php5.3/bin/php-cgi is 755, so I think everyone can execute
> it. Then, what is the problem?
Most probably, the nginx user cannot access the .php file you're trying
to execute, either because of its permissions or because it cannot
traverse one of its parent
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use Nginx+FastCgi+PHP
to build my web site. But I found if I start the php-cgi, through the
spawn-fcgi tool, as nginx:nginx, I got "No input file specified."
message on in my browser. If I spawn the process as root:root,
everything works fine. T
> /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
> libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file
>
> Meaning, run revdep-rebuild :)
Yeah, right. So revdep-rebuild does its thing, finds out that gcc is
broken and tries to rebuild it with the broken gcc :)
In t
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:18 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote:
> AFAIK in order to avoid this kind of
> breakage system ebuilds such as mpfr never delete old library
> versions;
> they just print a warning saying that the old library has been kept
> around and should be manually deleted after running revd
yes, USE_PYTHON. thank you!
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Evgeny Bushkov wrote:
> On 06.05.2011 13:28, Xi Shen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
>> supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
>> emerge packages for pyth
On 5/5/2011, at 10:53pm, Mick wrote:
> ...
> Portage should run lafilefixer on its own these days. The fixlafiles is one
> of the default FEATURES.
I only read of that on this list in the last few weeks, so had assumed it had
come of ~x86, but not yet x86.
Stroller.
On 06.05.2011 13:28, Xi Shen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
> supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
> emerge packages for python2.5.
>
> E.g. I emerged dev-python/oauth, but it is installed to
> /usr/lib64/python2.7, b
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine
thusly:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: lib
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log
Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes b
Dale wrote:
justin wrote:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr. No
Hi,
My system is Gentoo 64bit, up to date. I want to use GAE, but it
supports python2.5 only. So I emerged python2.5, but I am unable to
emerge packages for python2.5.
E.g. I emerged dev-python/oauth, but it is installed to
/usr/lib64/python2.7, but not python2.5.
I think using eselect to change
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:15 on Friday 06 May 2011, justin did opine
thusly:
> On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
> > That shed any light?
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-) :-)
>
> Yes it does
>
> /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
> libraries: libmpfr.so.1:
justin wrote:
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
That shed any light?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr. Now y
On 05/06/2011 12:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log
Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes but it is lengthy:
[...]
On 06/05/11 11:08, Dale wrote:
>
> That shed any light?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
>
Yes it does
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.4/cc1: error while loading shared
libraries: libmpfr.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
you upgraded your mpfr. Now you have to
ACHE2_MODULES=
INHERITED= toolchain-funcs multilib portability eutils flag-o-matic
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
JAVACC_HOME=/usr/share/javacc/
RSYNC_RETRIES=1
DIROPTIONS=-m0755
LICENSE=GPL-2
PKG_LOGDIR=/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/temp/logging
PORTAGE_LOG_FILE=/var/log/por
On 05/06/2011 11:28 AM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a
more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Here is one:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Here is one:
>>> Emerging (1 of 5) x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1
* gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:45 on Friday 06 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to update my old rig,
Hi,
I'm trying to update my old rig, the x86 one. It is about 2 months or
so behind. I wanted to get it ready for the latest KDE for my brother
to play on. I keep running into this type of error:
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to disable maintainer-specific port
Apparently, though unproven, at 05:03 on Friday 06 May 2011, Kfir Lavi did
opine thusly:
> Hi,
> emerge -vpt -e system
> ...
> [nomerge ] sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.3 USE="cracklib nls pam -audit
> (-selinux) -skey"
You used --tree
That line is probably part of some other packages dep graph. L
47 matches
Mail list logo
