3/16/2011, "Mick" вы писали:
>On Wednesday 16 March 2011 19:05:32 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a problem with configuring xorg-server 1.9.4.
>>
>> It starts and works OK. But just after it has started, the keyboard begins
>> to work very slowly in all virtual consoles that w
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 19:54:53 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> IIRC, @system is not in @world unless you put it there yourself. (This
> might depend on your portage version, though).
I'm sure I once saw a comment in a portage version that @system was being
included in @world to preserve earlier beh
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52:25PM +, James wrote
> OK Mark and Neil. I got the picture. I'll flush
> this out as I do seem to still have some
> 32bit apps on the 64bit AMD systems. Most likely
> I can get rid of these.
WINE, which runs some Windows apps, will not build on a 64-bit system
w
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 19:05:32 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a problem with configuring xorg-server 1.9.4.
>
> It starts and works OK. But just after it has started, the keyboard begins
> to work very slowly in all virtual consoles that were open prior to X.
>
> If I login i
16 марта 2011 г., 22:05:32, Alexey Mishustin пишет:
> Hi list,
> I have a problem with configuring xorg-server 1.9.4.
> It starts and works OK. But just after it has started, the keyboard begins
> to work very slowly in all virtual consoles that were open prior to X.
Not only slowly.
Also, the
On 3/15/2011 2:05 PM, Grant wrote:
> A dev is asking me to switch to a hardened profile in order to test a
> fix. I'm happy to go through the process, but is there a chance my
> laptop could be unusable after the switch? If that happens I'll be in
> real trouble. Will I be able to switch back to
Hi list,
I have a problem with configuring xorg-server 1.9.4.
It starts and works OK. But just after it has started, the keyboard begins to
work very slowly in all virtual consoles that were open prior to X.
If I login in a new virtual console, the keyboard works well until I enter into
an int
Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> > How is btrfs , from the "driver's seat"?
> I have had one instance of a more serious corruption caused by
> some bug in btrfs that needed the latest btrfsck from git to fix
> offline - later kernels do not suffer from this apparently.
Interesting...
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> As for the "unskippable" flag, I wonder if the other tools "rebuild" the menu
> structure and remove it that way. I have in the past played with making dvd-
> menus myself and it wasn't too hard. (following the howtos)
It is the UOP flag (
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 15:17:14 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 March 2011 13:54:57 Stroller wrote:
> > On 16/3/2011, at 12:44pm, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 09 March 2011 18:27:59 Stroller wrote:
> > >> I've got a Perl script to wrapper `dvdbackup && mkisofs`, reduce
> >
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 13:54:57 Stroller wrote:
> On 16/3/2011, at 12:44pm, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 March 2011 18:27:59 Stroller wrote:
> >> I've got a Perl script to wrapper `dvdbackup && mkisofs`, reduce
> >> typing a little and do some error-checking. ... In the next versi
On 16/3/2011, at 12:44pm, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 18:27:59 Stroller wrote:
>> I've got a Perl script to wrapper `dvdbackup && mkisofs`, reduce typing a
>> little and do some error-checking. ... In the next version
>> I'd like to remove the "unskippable" flag from all t
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 18:27:59 Stroller wrote:
> I've got a Perl script to wrapper `dvdbackup && mkisofs`, reduce typing a
> little and do some error-checking. It tries to preserve some of the DVD
> metadata (TITLE &c), and you might find it handy if handing off
> disk-swapping to your teenage
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 09:53:37 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 15.03.2011 07:50, schrieb Matthew Marlowe:
> >> My problem is that LVM2 is not supported in parted which is the
> >> recommended tool to deal with this.
> >>
> >> I suspect I only need to map the individual PE to a particular start
>
On 03/15/2011 04:26:44 PM, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>
> H, I've been contemplating btrfs on some new installs
> with the eventual goal of a CEPH network file system, on top
> of ext4 and/or btrfs. Is this issue just with the drivers, or
> related to btrfs too?
Am 15.03.2011 07:50, schrieb Matthew Marlowe:
>
>> My problem is that LVM2 is not supported in parted which is the
>> recommended tool to deal with this.
>>
>> I suspect I only need to map the individual PE to a particular start
>> sector on each drive, not btrfs, but then there is stripe/block si
16 matches
Mail list logo
