On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:53:04 Dale wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I have 4Gbs
> >> and it was up to about 3Gbs at one point and using some swap as well.
> >> I'm hoping to max out to 16G
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:59:24 Mick wrote:
> I'm running i7 Q 720 (4 cores, hyperthreaded) and have MAKEOPTS="-j9"
> without any slowdown. One or two packages (like OpenOffice) will fail and
> need -j=1 to emerge. Otherwise no noticeable drop in desktop
> responsiveness.
>
> I have not set
Am 28.01.2011 00:08, schrieb James:
> kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
>
> Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
> does not go into all of the individual packages.
>
[...]
>
> Ideas or suggestions are most welcome. The machine runs
> an ident
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:08:55 James wrote:
> kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
>
> Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
> does not go into all of the individual packages.
>
> I've never had trouble with kmix before, so any guidance
> as
On 01/27/2011 12:21 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I am NOT a NUMBER! I am a DEMOGRAPHIC!
I am NOT a HUSBAND! I am a MARITAL SERVICES PROVIDER!
kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
does not go into all of the individual packages.
I've never had trouble with kmix before, so any guidance
as to what package(s) to rebuild, would be appreciated.
Rebuildin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:50:57 -0600, Carlos Sura wrote:
> So It is safe or not? I'm currently using python 2.7 with no
> problems right now or at least I think so... 2.6 and 2.7 are safe,
> right.
2.6 and 2.7 are safe, either alone or together. I removed 2.6 from my
desktop nearly four months
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I have 4Gbs
and it was up to about 3Gbs at one point and using some swap as well.
I'm hoping to max out to 16Gbs as soon as I can. May upgrade to a 6 core
CPU too.
I wonder how
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:18:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:05:22 Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >> Once, when building my kernel, I accidentally forgot to specify the
> > >> number of makes and ran "make -j all". Tha
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
> What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
> into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
> changing?
Well, if you want to keep it simple, here is what I do:
edit /etc/vim/vimrc
"set ai " Always set au
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:05:22 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras
wrote:
> >> > On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> >> YoYo Sisk
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:06:30 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> > On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
>> >> YoYo Siska wrote:
>> >>> Yes.
>> >>> It might not be perfect, but mostly it w
Am 27.01.2011 22:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> I have to migrate mailusers from web-cyradm to postfixadmin (sure, on a
> gentoo-server -> on-topic ;-) ).
>
> Has anyone done that already? AFAI understand I have to export user/pws
> and import it in postfixadmin ... I am unsure about the e
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:06:30 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I have to migrate mailusers from web-cyradm to postfixadmin (sure, on a
gentoo-server -> on-topic ;-) ).
Has anyone done that already? AFAI understand I have to export user/pws
and import it in postfixadmin ... I am unsure about the encryption etc.
Maybe someone could help me with infos or a poi
On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> YoYo Siska wrote:
> >>> Yes.
> >>> It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
> >>> Once make started 10 or so process, w
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> YoYo Siska wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>> It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
>>> Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
>>> forgot to reenable swap, wh
On 01/27/2011 12:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> Btw, if you're using more instances than the amount of CPUs, the result
> will be slow-down.
>
> With the default kernel scheduler, best if amount of CPUs + 1. (On a
> 4-core, that's -j5).
And if you use emerge's "--jobs 2", each of those job
Don't forget to enable window decoration feature (run ccsm) and select your
decorator. I'd recommend using fusion-icon, makes things much more
accessible.
Cheers,
P.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Carlos Sura wrote:
> Hello mates,
>
> I'm running Gentoo ~amd64
>
> I try to install compiz-fusio
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > >> > So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster wh
Hello mates,
I'm running Gentoo ~amd64
I try to install compiz-fusion, following the wiki, everything seems to be
fine, but when I try to run compiz-fusion, it works but not so well, because
does not show me windows border, also I put compiz-fusion to use "indirect
rendering" and "loose binding"
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:28:47PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
> >
> > set pastetoggle=
>
> Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
> a hot key for it.
BTW, i
On 27 January 2011 14:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:31:13 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> > You can use any version you want for your own apps, but as of a couple
> > weeks ago, I know that switching the Gentoo system apps to Python 3
> > would break things. If the syst
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:31:13 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> You can use any version you want for your own apps, but as of a couple
> weeks ago, I know that switching the Gentoo system apps to Python 3
> would break things. If the system apps are still using 2.6 insteadof
> 2.7, there's proba
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
forgot to reenable swap, when I was playing with something before that
:)
yoyo
I noticed the same thing with
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
>>
>> set pastetoggle=
>
> Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
> a hot key for it.
>
>
I usually do a
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
forgot to reenable swap, when I was playing with something before that
:)
yoyo
I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
>
> set pastetoggle=
Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
a hot key for it.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
> into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
> changing?
>
> For instance, here's the first few lines of code from a web page:
>
> #define ARRAYSIZE(x) (si
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> > So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
> >> > runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Ev
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Carlos Sura
wrote:
> It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
> Python 3.1???
2.7 is pretty safe at this point; I use this as my main version I
haven't hit an issue in a while.
3.1 is probably not such a good idea.
What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
changing?
For instance, here's the first few lines of code from a web page:
#define ARRAYSIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(*(x)))
int main(void)
{
const char filename[] =
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> > So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
>> > runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the last were
>> > slower, it would be worth it.
>>
>>
On 2011-01-27, Carlos Sura wrote:
> I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could notice that
> there was 3 python versions.
>
> I have:
>
> Python 2.6
> Python 2.7
> Python 3.1
>
> It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
Probably not.
> Python
Carlos Sura wrote:
Hello,
I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could
notice that there was 3 python versions.
I have:
Python 2.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of
Python; Python 3.1???
Or should I stay in Python 2.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:12:49PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 15:05:25 YoYo Siska wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
> > > >[...]
> > > >I am using the -j option for the first time now
Hello,
I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could notice that
there was 3 python versions.
I have:
Python 2.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
Python 3.1???
Or should I stay in Python 2.6?
Regards,
--
Carlos S
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:10:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Re: Simultaneously emerging multiple packages with same
dependencies:
>On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
>> You can try, but the second instance with simply block until the
>> lock ha
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:09 on Thursday 27 January 2011, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
Given the amount of time unpack/configure/install of most packages needs
(very short), my observation is that it would not be worth it.
KDE.
unpack/configure/i
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
> > runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the last were
> > slower, it would be worth it.
>
> Given the amount of time unpack/configure/install o
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> You can try, but the second instance with simply block until the lock has
> been removed.
>
> I'm not aware of any package system that supports this. I don't think
> adding support for this justifies the added complexity.
>
>
Correct
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:09 on Thursday 27 January 2011, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
> On 01/27/2011 04:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >>> Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
> >>> p
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
>> seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
>> emerges but this new rig is so fast, I
On 01/27/2011 04:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
package can use it fully for compiling while another is configuring.
And what about the last package? The time you ga
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
> > package can use it fully for compiling while another is configuring.
>
> And what about the last package? The time you gained for faster
> configure and in
On 01/27/2011 04:16 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:21 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a
regular emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't re
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:21 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
> > seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a
> > regular emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't read it anyway.
> > I did have a packa
On Thursday 27 January 2011 15:05:25 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
> > >[...]
> > >I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
> > >seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all th
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
> >[...]
> >I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
> >seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
> >emerges but this new rig is so fas
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't read it anyway. I did have
a package to fail and it spit out the err
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I'm aware that portage uses locking mechanism before modifying 'world'
file, but what about the actual building process ? I'd expect emerge
to check if dependency package is already build/installed (or
current
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > I'm aware that portage uses locking mechanism before modifying 'world'
> > file, but what about the actual building process ? I'd expect emerge
> > to check if dependency package is already build/installed (or
> > currently being bui
53 matches
Mail list logo
