Hi,
adding Gentoo/emerge related stuff to the completion system of the zsh
is nice...but getting a dark blue color for parts of the prompt with
that is not.
Where can I tuirn what to modifiy the color or get back my previous
prompt?
Best regards,
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or Powe
walt [10-04-05 05:02]:
> On 04/04/2010 11:42 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> >alsa-1.0.21.
> >
> >When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> >to alsa-1.0.22.
>
> Do you have media-sound/al
Neil Bothwick [10-04-05 01:32]:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 20:42:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> > alsa-1.0.21.
> >
> > When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> > to alsa-1.0.22.
>
> The 1.0.22 us
http://sites.google.com/site/gni8hy9ojm/icfa5w
On 05/04/2010 02:34, walt wrote:
On 04/04/2010 01:04 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync t
On 04/04/2010 01:04 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync to stop it descending into other fi
On 04/04/2010 11:42 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
alsa-1.0.21.
When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
to alsa-1.0.22.
Do you have media-sound/alsa-driver installed? If so, that is the
cause of y
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, walt wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 07:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> keeper ~ # diff /usr/src/linux/.config /mnt/gentoo/usr/src/linux/.config
>> 4c4
>> < # Mon Mar 29 01:02:31 2010
>> ---
>>>
>>> # Sun Apr 4 06:28:53 2010
>>
>> 893,912c893,906
>> < CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
On 04/04/2010 07:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
keeper ~ # diff /usr/src/linux/.config /mnt/gentoo/usr/src/linux/.config
4c4
< # Mon Mar 29 01:02:31 2010
---
# Sun Apr 4 06:28:53 2010
893,912c893,906
< CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
< CONFIG_MD_RAID0=m
Hi Mark,
Interesting thread, and I'm learning a lo
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>> On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
>>> that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
>>
>> Interesting. I suppose t
On 05/04/2010 00:58, Mark Knecht wrote:
One thing about this that still confuses me is where /dev/md3, or
whatever, comes from when I boot if the the mknod command is never
executed within the chrrot. (As per the install guide.) Not a big deal
to proceed and see what happens. Maybe the kernel jus
On 05/04/2010 00:51, Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
Dnia 2010-04-04, o godz. 21:04:03
Neil Bothwick napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or
bind mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> 1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
>> that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
>
> Interesting. I suppose that might be a change in mdadm-3.0 (a version which
> I have
Dnia 2010-04-04, o godz. 21:04:03
Neil Bothwick napisał(a):
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> > Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or
> > bind mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
>
> Use the -x option with rsync to sto
On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
Interesting. I suppose that might be a change in mdadm-3.0 (a version
which I have yet to use to create any new arrays). However, that would
contr
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 23:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> First, thanks for sticking with me on this. I really appreciate it.
>> Second, I apologize for the length of the reply but it's still not
>> working and I wanted to try and clearly show the steps
On 04/04/2010 23:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
First, thanks for sticking with me on this. I really appreciate it.
Second, I apologize for the length of the reply but it's still not
working and I wanted to try and clearly show the steps I've taken.
Maybe you or someone else will see the step I'm mis
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 20:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> So this suggests that because I did the install from a running Gentoo
>> chroot that the mknod commands didn't stick? Somehow they were part
>> of, or because part of, the host Gentoo non-RAID insta
I'm running with full system FEATURES="test" on, and I have a couple of
programs that depended on dev-libs/boost. The boost testsuite always
fails in my computer due to insufficient disk space, I usually simply
skip the test for boost and just go on with the merge. But today, I
decided to let the t
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 20:42:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> alsa-1.0.21.
>
> When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> to alsa-1.0.22.
The 1.0.22 userspace tools work fine with the drivers in 2.6.32.
On 04/04/2010 20:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
So this suggests that because I did the install from a running Gentoo
chroot that the mknod commands didn't stick? Somehow they were part
of, or because part of, the host Gentoo non-RAID install? Interesting.
I don't know what the handbook says these days
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
> Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
> mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync to stop it descending into other filesystems.
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you hear
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
> bigger one.
>
> I think of doing as follows:
> Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
> Mount small disk read-only
> Mount bigger disk read-write
>
> cd into mountpoint of the first one
>
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> Ah, that looks better. Not that I've pored over every line, but at first
> glance everything seems to be in order. There are no obvious gotchas that I
> can see, so I'm somewhat puzzled.
As am I!
>
> Here are a few random things that spri
On 04/04/2010 20:05, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
bigger one.
I think of doing as follows:
Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
Mount small disk read-only
Mount bigger disk read-write
cd into mountpoint of the first one
cp -
On 04/04/2010 19:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
Aside from all of that, notable options that are going to be required to
boot in your case are:
CONFIG_MD_RAID1
CONFIG_SATA_AHCI
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION (normally implicit but worth mentioning)
That, and the opt
Hi,
I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
bigger one.
I think of doing as follows:
Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
Mount small disk read-only
Mount bigger disk read-write
cd into mountpoint of the first one
cp -a . ../
Seems to me slow but correct? Or?
(I ha
>Von: nor...@smash-net.org
>Datum: 04.04.2010 11:37
>An:
>Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user]
Checking sanity of system...
>
>Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is no security
issue in sense of attacks...it is related
>> to the consistency of the system.
>>
>> Simple ques
Hi,
I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
alsa-1.0.21.
When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
to alsa-1.0.22.
Is there a way that emerge/eix or whatever relizes the version of
alsa which the kernel is runnig and only suggests updates which a
On 04/04/2010 18:50, Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
No problem supplying it. I did the rebuild this morning but forced
metadata to Type 1.0. No change as you suggested there wouldn't be.
OK, here's:
1) lspci to read& lspci -k to see drivers both from the non-RAID kernel
2) The RAID kernel config
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 15:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
The actual failure message is the f
On 04/04/2010 15:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
The actual failure message is the fairly standard
VFS - Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,0)
[snip]
CONFI
Hello Everyone!
I am trying to install gentoo on my eee1201h and used this howto:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
to setup a bootable SD card.
The system boots but depscan fail with
"line 128: /bin/chmod: Input/Output Error"
"line 139: Bus Error"
and a lot more.
Almost every command i
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Try appending md=3,/dev/sdb3,/dev/sdc3 to the kernel command line
> parameters.
>
Thanks. Tried that one last night but no luck, although it does change
the message to Unknown-block(9,3) from Unknown-block(9,0).
Cheers,
Mark
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
>>
>> The actual failure message is the fairly standard
>>
>> VFS - Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,0)
>
> [snip]
>
>> CONFIG_MD_RAID1=y
>
> That'
Try appending md=3,/dev/sdb3,/dev/sdc3 to the kernel command line
parameters.
On 04/04/2010 01:45 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 16:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> The install is complete but it won't boot. grub finds the kernel
>> and starts booting but then I get the typical V
Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Hi,
>
> this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> to the consistency of the system.
>
> Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
>
> How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
> and sane?
On Sunday 04 April 2010 01:52:17 Adam wrote:
> > Probably neither. Can you Ctrl+F12 to see what the logs are
> > saying? I've been getting kernel Oops! on shutdown on one
> > machine of mine with the 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 kernel. Might be
> > similar
>
> Ok, i found this, which is mentioning fglrx,
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Dale [10-04-04 08:36]:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answe
On 04/04/2010 10:07 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;
Dale [10-04-04 08:36]:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >>to the consistency of the system.
> >>
> >>Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >>
>
Dale [10-04-04 08:20]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >to the consistency of the system.
> >
> >Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >
> >How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
> On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >to the consistency of the system.
> >
> >Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >
> >How can I check, that
43 matches
Mail list logo
