You probably need scsi and scsi disk support compiled in as well. Everything
associated with accessing the device and the filesystem it contains has to be
compiled in to the kernel and not be a module. The initrd is loaded into
memory and loads the kernel modules (the ones you need to compil
2008/12/8 Kacper Kopczyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
>
>> How about you replace the <= symbols by '~', such that revision
>> updates are also alwowed?
>>
>
> I'll try as soon as I fix my laptop. It survived journey across the country,
> daily tr
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 08:05 +0100 schrieb ext Heinrichs, Dirk
(EXT-Capgemini - DE/Dusseldorf):
> > I'll extract `exact' messages if you are willing to spend some time
> on
> > this. But I suspect we should begin another thread with a subject
> > that makes it clear this is about building
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 16:34 -0600 schrieb ext Harry Putnam:
> Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
> >> I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
> >> of mine to build a new kernel not
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
T
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
That's an LSI Fusion-MPT controller. Enable:
Device Drivers->[*] F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> My guess is tha while inside the initrd a kenrel module was loaded
> and it was something that you needed to read the boot volume. Are
> you statically or modulely including your sata drivers? Sent via
> BlackBerry from T-Mobile
kyle, how can I discover what is in t
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...]
>> mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
>> ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
>> scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
>
> That's an LSI Fusion-MPT controller. Enable:
>
> Device Drivers->[*] Fusion
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
About sdb3. In the following dmesg output (when booting with a
working kernel-2.6.24-r8 I wondered if anyone can determine what
driver is involved there. I couldn't really tell much from it other
than the kernel sees it with no problem:
==
My guess is tha while inside the initrd a kenrel module was loaded and it was
something that you needed to read the boot volume. Are you statically or
modulely including your sata drivers?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dat
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> [...]
>> It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
>> to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
>> `/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
>
> According to your screenshot, you
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your screensh
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> [...]
>> It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
>> to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
>> `/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
>
> According to your screenshot, you
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your screenshot, you don't even have an sdb. All the
kernel sees is one hard di
Geralt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> a generic way is:
> 1) Go to /usr/src/linux
> 2) grep tg3 $(find -name Makefile)
Nice... I had come up with an even more shotgun approache.
grep -r tg3
I didn't have enough sense to know it would be in Makefiles
I've started a new thread on my kernel troubles. I thought the thread
subject should be more indicative of the semi OT nature of the query.
Also thought it might make the information that accrues here more
findable for any future searchers.
Here is the general setup and the general problem:
vmw
Dale wrote:
>
> This is interesting. I am starting a new install on my backup drive.
> I'm part way through the install, fetching all the KDE stuff right now.
> This is what I got from the little frag script:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # /root/fragck.pl /backup/
> 0.953336175120985% non contiguous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Huysmans wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Don't know if it's appropriate to post this on this list, sorry if it's
> not. Anyway, this is serious: we are currently looking for a junior IT
> with some Gentoo experience and with a special interest in media
> en
Hi,
a generic way is:
1) Go to /usr/src/linux
2) grep tg3 $(find -name Makefile)
of course you can replace tg3 with every other module name (but don't
add the .ko extension!)
Geralt.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are running it in vmware right?
>
> Your disk type, disk adapters type and chipset in a vmware vm are
> NOT the same as these device on the physical hardware. vmware
> emulates a BX440 chipset, SCSI drives and LSI or BusLogic
> adapter. You must use
Chris Thomas gmail.com> writes:
> I have one similar to yours. IIRC, mine is a Realtek 8139 chipset
> which works fine with the driver in the kernel.
> -Chris
Thanks to all that answered.
Oh, one more cool use,
On embedded (linux) systems where there is no hardware
ethernet, seems pretty
Neil Walker ep.mine.nu> writes:
James wrote:
> > http://www.mpja.com/prodinfo.asp?number=17669+CP
> > My question is has anyone every got one of these working on gentoo,
> > or a similar product from another vendor?
> Errm ... quite honestly, why would you want to?
Lots of reasons. Turn a
Steve wrote:
I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
through which I must jump...
I found this:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But help is at hand!
> The .config option you are looking for is CONFIG_TIGON3 My last
> notebook had one of those and I searched for ages before spotting
> one day that "t", "g" and "3" all appeared in "TIGON3".
>
> Sorry that I couldn't help with the
Its a tigon 3 broadcom nic if that helps, I can get the .config line once I
beat traffic
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:56:30
To:
Subject: [gentoo-user] How to tie module name to Kernel CONFIG
S
On Thursday 11 December 2008 00:34:24 Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Why do you think you need an initramfs at all? It's usually only
> > needed in very rare cases where either a driver for storage hardware
> > is needed which is not part of the kernel itself or some user space
> > things need to be done
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
>> I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
>> of mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram)
>> has failed with the boot routine f
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 22:56:30 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Summary:
> How can I tie a module name (tg3) to a kernel config line?
>
> Details:
> Usually its kind of obvious if you dig around in .config a bit, but
> now always.
>
> I find the module at /lib/modules/2.6.24*/:
> ../kernel/drivers/net
Summary:
How can I tie a module name (tg3) to a kernel config line?
Details:
Usually its kind of obvious if you dig around in .config a bit, but
now always.
I find the module at /lib/modules/2.6.24*/:
../kernel/drivers/net/tg3.ko
But I haven't been able to nail that to a kernel config line.
Sea
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
> I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
> of mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram)
> has failed with the boot routine failing to recognize my /dev/sdb3 as root.
What i
I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt of
mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram) has
failed with the boot routine failing to recognize my /dev/sdb3 as root.
Its a gentoo vmappliance running on windows xp pro.
I'm not asking about
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Steve wrote:
> I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
> server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
> gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
> through which I must jump...
>
>
I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
through which I must jump...
I found this:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/HOWTO_Ins
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:15:14 -0600
"Paul Hartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Paul Hartman writes:
> >
> >> I accidentally sent this from the wrong email address the first
> >> time, not sure if it went through to the li
On Wednesday 10 Dec 2008, AJ Spagnoletti wrote:
> > Anyone ever reply to this? If you're using Gnome, then HAL + Gnome will
> > take care of it. I am using HAL + ivman in my servers. It works well
> > for fixing mount points.
>
> Thanks, I got several replies but all pointed to just using hal +
At Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:00:39 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joerg believes that cdrkit is not as good as cdrtools (I have used only
>> cdrtools and it works well for me).
>
> "Believes" is less that "knows".
I was/am trying to sou
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 16:46:54 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Andrew Gaydenko writes:
> > Is there a way to predict which dependecies will be unsatisfied at case
> > of unmerging some package without real unmerging?
>
> emerge --depclean -pv XYZ
>
> Wonko
Thanks!
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
> Indeed :)
>
> (Sorry, couldn't resist :P)
>
> Dale wrote:
>> Justin wrote:
>>> Nicolas Sebrecht schrieb:
>>>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:45:16PM +, Stroller wrote:
>I find a flow of
> quoting
"Andrey Vul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just follow my advise...
> >
> > Jörg
> >
> Unfortunately, the gentoo people say that "cdrkit does it without
> root, why can't cdrtools?"
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
Let me append a proof for the incorrectness of the claim that wodi
Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg believes that cdrkit is not as good as cdrtools (I have used only
> cdrtools and it works well for me).
"Believes" is less that "knows". I know that if you take a very old source
and add new bugs that the result cannot be better than the maintain
"Andrey Vul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, the gentoo people say that "cdrkit does it without
> root, why can't cdrtools?"
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
Well, imaging there is a road that ends in an abyss and there is a sign "beware
of the abyss" and some people r
42 matches
Mail list logo
