2008/11/30 Dio, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi all,
>> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
>> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
>> 1k per minute.
>> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
>> much information on the
lsof ?
Il giorno dom, 30/11/2008 alle 01.15 +, Pupino ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
> 1k per minute.
> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
> m
On Sunday 30 November 2008, Pupino wrote:
> Hi all,
> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
> 1k per minute.
> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
> much information on the disk.
>
Pupino schrieb am 30.11.2008 02:15:
> Hi all,
> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
> 1k per minute.
> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
> much information on the disk.
> Now t
> Hi all,
> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
> 1k per minute.
> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
> much information on the disk.
> Now the problem is that i have absolutely
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 01:15 +, Pupino wrote:
> Hi all,
> i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
> Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
> 1k per minute.
> I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
> much information on the
Hi all,
i noticed a strange behaviour on my macine recently.
Something is continuously filling up my root partition at a speed near
1k per minute.
I have just few programs running and none of them should save that
much information on the disk.
Now the problem is that i have absolutely no idea of wh
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Pielmeier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht schrieb am 30.11.2008 00:29:
>
>> It seems that
>> gramps is doing something sort of like this but one wonders just how
>> large their database is. Also, I'd hate for my wife to do a lot of
>> work entering a
Mark Knecht schrieb am 30.11.2008 00:29:
> It seems that
> gramps is doing something sort of like this but one wonders just how
> large their database is. Also, I'd hate for my wife to do a lot of
> work entering a few hundred people only to find she cannot use the
> gramps data with anything but
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/29/08, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone have any recommendations of something in portage. (Or not in
>> portage?)
>
> Wikipedia has some, they've even tried to categorize a bit and made
> some tables of the
On 11/29/08, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have any recommendations of something in portage. (Or not in
> portage?)
Wikipedia has some, they've even tried to categorize a bit and made
some tables of the basic features:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_genealogy_softwar
On Saturday 29 November 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
>
> 1. Anyone aware of a wiki or other gentoo "help" that describes how to
> change the boot message "size" during boot?
yes, it is. In /usr/src/Documentation.
A few years back I installed gentoo and everything worked fine, except
that the OS bootup messages were too "big", and scrolled by too fast.
Somewhere I found a tweak (IIRC, it involved recompiling the kernel)
that handled it fine - i.e. the font was reduced dramatically after the
bios was boo
Mark Knecht schrieb am 29.11.2008 19:34:
> Anyone have any recommendations of something in portage. (Or not in portage?)
>
> I found gramps in portage. I did not find Lifelines. I haven't
> uncovered any other project names as yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
I do not use it myself but I know there
Anyone have any recommendations of something in portage. (Or not in portage?)
I found gramps in portage. I did not find Lifelines. I haven't
uncovered any other project names as yet.
Thanks,
Mark
Am Samstag, 29. November 2008 18:32:34 schrieb Rodrigo Lazo:
> I think he mean a pager like this:
>
> http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/fbpager/
Aargh, stupid me. Yes, there's two meanings of "pager".
Bye...
Dirk
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Samstag, 29. November 2008 07:30:03 schrieb Harry Putnam:
>
>> Can anyone tell me if there is a desktop pager that can be run
>> regardless of window manager?
>>
>> Browsing through portage, It appears there is not such a critter.
>
> xterm -e less
Hi Fred,
no problem...I am also no native english speaker...so, well,
may be it is my english not yours what screws up things a little... :)
MP3/OGG are audio codecs, which are lossy. Means: If you encode a
wav-file to mp3, than decode this one again back to wav there is
some sound loss.
Audacit
> Hello,
>
>
> I tought this one decodes before editing ???
>
>
This is what I found in audacity homepage:
"Audacity is free, open source software for recording and editing sounds. It is
available for Mac OS X, Microsoft
Windows, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems."
So I think he is able t
Hello,
I tought this one decodes before editing ???
Fred Elno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-11-29 16:21]:
> Hello,
>
> I did you try Audacity?
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a ogg/mp3 editing softwarei (gui), which is able to
> > cut/append such streams without loss due to reencoding.
> >
>
Hello,
I did you try Audacity?
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a ogg/mp3 editing softwarei (gui), which is able to
> cut/append such streams without loss due to reencoding.
>
> What software is worth trying ?
>
> Thank you very much for your help in advance!
>
> Kind regards,
> mcc
>
>
> --
> Pleas
Hi,
I am looking for a ogg/mp3 editing softwarei (gui), which is able to
cut/append such streams without loss due to reencoding.
What software is worth trying ?
Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unles
On Saturday 29 November 2008, Eric Martin wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For some reason my Gentoo rsa public key is not liked by 3.9p1-11.el4_7
> > sshd, which is running on a CentOS server. On the Gentoo machine I am
> > running net-misc/openssh-5.1_p1-r1. This is what it shows:
> > =
Andrey Vul schrieb:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:29, Florian Philipp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iain's diagnosis seems about right. I would start with a nice 2h memtest86+
test followed with a 1h cpuburn test.
I believe you mean 2d memtest86+ unless computer has DDR9-9 RAM
where 100 (full
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Florian Philipp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for my photos, I can back all the collection to a single DVD (and
to a second one, since I keep hearing that DVD-Rs are unreliable), and
since I don't take new photos every week,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 11:19:47 Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Now let's put the assumptions aside and do a test.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] # test $ cat /usr/portage/packages/All/* > test1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] # test $ cp test1 test2
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] # test $ ls -lah
> total 2.3G
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root us
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:24:08 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Given my experience with XFS, I won't be switching anytime soon. I used
> that once on a in-laws system. After each crash, power failure, I had
> to reinstall. Let's just say it left a bad taste in my mouth. ;-) I'm
> not saying it is a bad fi
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:19:47 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Personally I think NTFS is one of the things MS have done right. It is
> fast, stable and has the features of the Linux FSes and even more. It
> has journal, quotas, permissions, mount points, symbolic links. Does
> any of ext, reiserfs or
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:46:01 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2008 13:14:42 Dale wrote:
> > If this is a little high, what would be the best way to defrag it?
>
> By not defragging it.
I beg to defer. The simplest way to defrag a partition is to make
backup a
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> I've been waiting for a proper statistical analysis of this question for
> years. I'm still waiting :-) Besides, modern storage presents an extra
> wrinkle. Defrag as most of the world knows it originated in DOS, where disk
> sectors were guaranteed to be laid out on dis
On Friday 28 November 2008 17:08:03 Stroller wrote:
> I understood that ReiserFS's trees could become out-of-balance,
> resulting in performance loss, and that the way to deal with this was
> to tar the contents of the drive to another file-system and then untar
> them back.
That's what I te
On Friday 28 November 2008 18:09:37 Joshua Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2008 13:14:42 Dale wrote:
> >> If this is a little high, what would be the best way to defrag it?
> >
> > By not defragging it.
> >
> > It'
On Friday 28 November 2008 20:24:38 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2008 13:14:42 Dale wrote:
> >> If this is a little high, what would be the best way to defrag it?
> >
> > By not defragging it.
> >
> > It's not Windows. Windows boxes needs defragging not
33 matches
Mail list logo
