Hi,
>
> the howtos on gentoo-wiki worked well for me.
I'm working with them, too. Just one question remains: I want to use
udev. Do I have to create the md devices or does udev that for me?
>
>
> > - Put the root partition on another RAID1 (I thought about putting the
> > root filesystem int
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people
> send me, and because antiword is a little too minimal.
I'm happy with abiword for word processing and gnumeric for
spreadsheet stuff.
--
Walter Dnes <[EMAIL
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>
> Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g.
> like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does
> softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long
> text lines) by using command pipe?
>
I think y
Hi,
I want to use iozone to test my cluster, and I found that iozone would use rsh.
But rsh never worked in my machine.
I have followed this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/hpc-howto.xml#doc_chap2, which including
the configuration of rsh.
# eix netkit-rsh
[I] net-misc/netkit-rsh
Availa
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:13:46AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g.
> like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does
> softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long
> text
Hi
...just a shot in the dark: Try 'fmt' (UNIX standard too so no extra
install I think).
Kind regards,
Meino Cramer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-20 03:52]:
> Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g.
> like text file created on Microsoft Windows'
Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g.
like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does
softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long
text lines) by using command pipe?
I could use vim, activate some formatting op
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote:
>> I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space:
>> earlier versions needed < 3 GB , so this is a big jump,
>> esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using).
> I have
On 10/19/08, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
>> if
>> relevant.
>^^^
>
> You did not do this. You posted the bottommost error.
>
Well, the error message essentially didn't ch
On 10/19/08, Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is your portage tree stored? In /usr/portage I guess, so remove
> this PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage" or replace it with
> PORTDIR="/usr/portage" but this is not needed as it is default.
> Regarding PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> This is getting insane. Sun needs to have a good long hard look at this build
> process - 5G+ to build a package that totals 380M when installed is just a
> tad over the top in my book
>
>
Someone once told me there is a library he needs for math and physics a
the univ
Philip Webb schrieb:
> 081019 Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>>
>
> Sorry, that's >= 5,3 GB ... (red face)
>
>
Thanks for that info. Than I will h
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote:
> I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space:
> earlier versions needed < 3 GB , so this is a big jump,
> esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using).
I have 4.5G free in /var and I've already
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:24 Philip Webb wrote:
> 081019 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
> >> Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here
> >> ?
> >
> > It's this [details snipped: thanks]:
> > So basically it is depen
On Sunday 19 October 2008 19:32:42 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Alan McKinnon writes:
> > Repost the output of your emerge command using the "-t" option.
> >
> > Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge
> > -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to
>
Alan McKinnon writes:
> Repost the output of your emerge command using the "-t" option.
>
> Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge
> -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to
> determine WHY it's happening. If you are going to post emerge out
081019 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
>>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>>> but needed 5,3 GB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>> T
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
>> Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ?
> It's this [details snipped: thanks]:
> So basically it is dependant on the nsplugin USE flag
> and will look for xulrunner or seamonkey
On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>> It opened my usual spreadsheets &
Hi,
I am regulary updateing my system with the newest release of
the linux kernel from ftp.kernel.org.
My graphics card is an nVidia Corporation GeForce 7600 GT (rev a2)
(according to lspci).
For kernels of version 2.6.26.* I was using nvidia driver version 173.14.12.
This version failed to co
On Sunday 19 October 2008 16:50:37 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild:
> >
> > RDEPEND="
> > !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT}
> > "
> >
> > [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than
> > 4.4.0
On Sunday 19 October 2008 16:51:32 Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
> > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
> >
> > I don't really know an
Peter Humphrey schrieb am 19.10.2008 16:50:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild:
>>
>> RDEPEND="
>> !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT}
>> "
>>
>> [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than
>> 4.4.0_alpha, it means a
Liviu Andronic schrieb am 19.10.2008 16:51:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
>>> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
>> I don't really know an answer, but I'm curi
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
>
> I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been
> attempted with these t
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild:
>
> RDEPEND="
> !<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT}
> "
>
> [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than
> 4.4.0_alpha, it means any version less than that which is SLOT=4.
I thought th
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:54:24 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I
> tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2,
> but I still have a couple of show-stoppers.
>
> After running autounmask, I had 81 new en
I think I had the similar blocks while upgrading my kde from 3.5.x to 4.1.2,
I just unmerged x11-libs/qt-core then everything seemed to be fine.
-Weifeng
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE
Folks,
Has anyone used AutoFS with the automounter information coming from
LDAP?
I have a LDAP server with the necessary maps setup. I have a number of
LDAP clients on Debian successfully using this. However, I cannot get
this to work with Gentoo. When I try to start autofs I get a message
say
Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I
tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2,
but I still have a couple of show-stoppers.
After running autounmask, I had 81 new entries in package.keywords, but I
had to add another 82 myself a
on 2008-10-19 at 01:25 Philip Webb wrote:
>Dillo 2.0 has been announced:
well, _that_ is good news.
visiting the dillo home page (http://www.dillo.org/) i see that dillo
2.0 has been released, and there's even something about 2.1 in the
changelog. would it be too difficult to update the ebuild?
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 19 October 2008 09:06:23 Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by:
>>
>> WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded
>> (will try again).
>> rsync: read errors mapping "/profiles/ChangeLog"
On Sunday 19 October 2008 12:59:35 Arttu V. wrote:
> On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
>
> I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been
> attempted with these two lines. Would it w
On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been
attempted with these two lines. Would it work better without overlays,
i.e., by commenting these two out
Hi there!
As my system froze again right now, I've tried to reproduce it, tried to use
some of the hints given to me in this thread, and made the following
observations:
* The system freezes on heavy I/O on my sata-harddisks, especially when
copying mpeg-files (>2GB) from one disk to another.
On Saturday 18 October 2008 20:58:07 RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Oct 18 18:43:35 huang usb 3-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and
> address 7 Oct 18 18:43:35 huang usb 3-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1
> choice Oct 18 18:43:45 huang hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on
> port
On Saturday 18 October 2008 23:31:56 kashani wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Friday 17 October 2008 23:27:44 RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> >> heehee have been wanting to get onboard with gentoo for a while now how
> >> ironic that the wiki site i was so looking forward to using is down the
> >> s
On Sunday 19 October 2008 09:06:23 Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by:
>
> WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded
> (will try again).
> rsync: read errors mapping "/profiles/ChangeLog" (in gentoo-portage):
> Stale NFS fi
On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote:
> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
> It opened my usual spreadsheets & word-processing files correctly,
> but the toolbar needs atte
Hi,
I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by:
WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded
(will try again).
rsync: read errors mapping "/profiles/ChangeLog" (in gentoo-portage):
Stale NFS file handle (116)
Anybody else get that? Portage seems to wor
Philip Webb wrote:
> 081019 Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine,
>> but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware).
>>
>
> Sorry, that's >= 5,3 GB ... (red face)
>
>
Don't worry, we knew that was a boo
41 matches
Mail list logo
