Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2008 07:19:37 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It getting more confused:
>
> This morning I did a
> [...]
> emerge -pv kde
Now I am confused. Thought you wanted to install kde-meta???
> still reports:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild N] kde-base/kdebase-3.5
Sorry, I mistyped some tings:
I meant (hrrrmm): :)
The /blocking/ items are only shown with
emerge -pv kde.
and
emerge .pv gnome shows package to be updated.
emerge -pvuNDt world shows no blocking items nor
gnome packages to be updated.
...its too early in the morning (7.28 am). ;)
Meino
[E
It getting more confused:
This morning I did a
emerge -pvuNDt world
again and it shows me nothing suspicious.
But doing a
emerge -pv kde
still reports:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r3 USE="branding cups hal ldap opengl
pam -arts -debug -ieee139
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 23:29 -0400, David Relson wrote:
[...]
> Can somebody please explain how the gnome main menu is built, where it
> resides, and how to force a rebuild?
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/
G'day,
It has been my impression that the gnome-panel's main menu is based on
info in files in /usr/share/applications. However there are items in my
menus (for example, other/kate and other/kwrite) without files and
there are files without entries (for example, virtualbox.desktop).
I've tried '
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Andreas Simbuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In addition i try to solve the problems by doing an
> emerge -eaD world
-D is unnecessary if -e is specified.
And I prefer this: emerge -evp world 2>&1 | tee ew
Then I can look at ew using less and see if everything is
Roy Wright wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> I don't use these at all. GKrellm kicks SysGuard's butt :-)
>>
>
> Wow! I hadn't seen GKrellm before. 15 minutes of config and theme
> selection and I'm sold!
>
> Thank you,
> Roy
>
>
>
>
I think there are almost 200 different themes, skin
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:05:35 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2008 00:03:47 Andreas Simbuerger wrote:
> > > Installs to /usr/local/lib sounds like b0rked ebuilds. I'd try
> > > using equery to find the ebuilds that installed "bad" files.
> > > Then I'd look for "/usr/local" in th
Roy Wright wrote:
> Trying to switch from kde-portage to kde-testing overlays did not
> progress well. What I'd like to do to recover is unmerge all the kde
> 4.1 stuff and start over. Does anyone know a simple way (maybe a
> script) to do this? As far as I'm concerned, I'd really like to unmerg
On Saturday 04 October 2008 18:30:02 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:28:32 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > > > why compiz? kde 4.1 has rather nice effects build in (which can be
> > > > turned off easily in systemsettings)
On Saturday 04 October 2008 18:54:16 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> === On Saturday 04 October 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: ===
> ...
>
> > > Phonon (working with ALSA/hdsp)
> >
> > Still trying to figure out how to use Phonon :-)
>
> Do you mean Phonon in common, or Phonon + RME card? The thing is
On Saturday 04 October 2008 18:56:44 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> === On Saturday 04 October 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: ===
>
> > > Amarok 2.x (dealing with local files only)
> >
> > stay with amarok 1.4
>
> Do you mean, 1.4 does work under KDE4?
Yes and no. It works fine if KDE-4
On Saturday 04 October 2008 19:44:36 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 18:55:28 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > yesno: emerge -C removes it (?) physically, but it is still reported
> > by emerge...
>
> The following may be just a wild guess, but who knows...
>
> You state you did a
On Sunday 05 October 2008 00:03:47 Andreas Simbuerger wrote:
> > Installs to /usr/local/lib sounds like b0rked ebuilds. I'd try using
> > equery to find the ebuilds that installed "bad" files. Then I'd look
> > for "/usr/local" in those ebuilds and fix them. Putting the fixed
> > ebuilds in /usr
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:15 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:17:52 +0200
> Andreas Simbuerger wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 22:08 +0200, Justin wrote:
> > > Andreas Simbuerger schrieb:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to change the install-directory of ebui
Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 20:39:52 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > > stay with amarok 1.4
> >
> > Do you mean, 1.4 does work under KDE4?
>
> sure, as long as you keep 3.5 installed
kdelibs plus eventually a handful other packages would be enough, I guess.
emerge will take care of the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I don't use these at all. GKrellm kicks SysGuard's butt :-)
Wow! I hadn't seen GKrellm before. 15 minutes of config and theme
selection and I'm sold!
Thank you,
Roy
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:17:52 +0200
Andreas Simbuerger wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 22:08 +0200, Justin wrote:
> > Andreas Simbuerger schrieb:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Is it possible to change the install-directory of ebuilds?
> > > Let's say for example:
> > >
> > > TODIR=/usr/local/lib emer
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 22:08 +0200, Justin wrote:
> Andreas Simbuerger schrieb:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Is it possible to change the install-directory of ebuilds?
> > Let's say for example:
> >
> > TODIR=/usr/local/lib emerge python
> >
> > I tried to find a clue within the Gentoo Documentation and t
Andreas Simbuerger schrieb:
> Greetings,
>
> Is it possible to change the install-directory of ebuilds?
> Let's say for example:
>
> TODIR=/usr/local/lib emerge python
>
> I tried to find a clue within the Gentoo Documentation and the Forums
> but still no idea how to do that.
>
> -
> As it is
Greetings,
Is it possible to change the install-directory of ebuilds?
Let's say for example:
TODIR=/usr/local/lib emerge python
I tried to find a clue within the Gentoo Documentation and the Forums
but still no idea how to do that.
-
As it is my first post to a mailing list, i hope it's not
On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> === On Saturday 04 October 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: ===
>
> > > Amarok 2.x (dealing with local files only)
> >
> > stay with amarok 1.4
>
> Do you mean, 1.4 does work under KDE4?
sure, as long as you keep 3.5 installed
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 20:00]:
> Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 19:47:49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > solfire:/root>emerge -pvC kdebase kdeaddons kdeadmin kdeartwork kdeedu
> > kdegames kdegraphics kdemultimedia kdenetwork kdepim kdetoys kdeutils
> > kdewebdev kdeaccessibili
Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 19:47:49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> solfire:/root>emerge -pvC kdebase kdeaddons kdeadmin kdeartwork kdeedu
> kdegames kdegraphics kdemultimedia kdenetwork kdepim kdetoys kdeutils
> kdewebdev kdeaccessibility
>
> This take a too short time to do anything physically on
Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 19:38]:
> On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, it does not help. The current state (excerpt) is:
>
> > Total: 23 packages (3 upgrades, 4 downgrades, 15 new, 1 in new slot, 18
> > blocks), Size of downloads: 63,220 kB
>
> There is
Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 18:55:28 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> yesno: emerge -C removes it (?) physically, but it is still reported
> by emerge...
The following may be just a wild guess, but who knows...
You state you did an emerge -C of some packages, but the packages are still
reported as
On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it does not help. The current state (excerpt) is:
> Total: 23 packages (3 upgrades, 4 downgrades, 15 new, 1 in new slot, 18
> blocks), Size of downloads: 63,220 kB
There is one blocker less, which is slightly better but certainly not
=== On Saturday 04 October 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: ===
> > Amarok 2.x (dealing with local files only)
>
> stay with amarok 1.4
Do you mean, 1.4 does work under KDE4?
b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 18:50]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> >Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 16:49]:
> >>On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>[blocks B ] >>>x11-libs/gtk+-2.14.3-r2)
> >>I'm no expert on this, but to me this looks like you're
=== On Saturday 04 October 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: ===
...
> > Phonon (working with ALSA/hdsp)
>
> Still trying to figure out how to use Phonon :-)
Do you mean Phonon in common, or Phonon + RME card? The thing is, ALSA is
some thing, but ALSA + hdsp is something another :-) - there are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, b.n. wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
>>> Thanks for the additional info. Good to know!
>>>
>>
>> I think this little misunderstanding could be solved, in the future,
>> by clarifying it (perhaps in a footnote) in the gentoo docs. To me
>> th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 16:49]:
On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[blocks B ]
I'm no expert on this, but to me this looks like you're running some
unstable gnome/gtk packages? This particular line reminds me of this
quite
...
> I find it quite humorous that the crappy on-board Intel video chips give
> the best performance on KDE-4 :-)
Well, it's time to redefine the term "crappy" :-)
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 18:20]:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:50:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 17:49]:
> > > On Saturday 04 October 2008 16:19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hi Alan,
> > > >
> > > > yes, this is the point whe
On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > Konsole (he-he :-) )
>
> Works just fine. A few minor things are missing, like having the current
> command show in the title bar.
well, with 4.1.68 it works (and I am too lazy to check 4.1.2 right now ;) )
On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> >
> > for the two above: there are countless plasmoids, just look around.
>
> As far as I have not KDE 4 installed, I can not look around yet :-)
kde-looks.org ;)
On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:28:32 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > > why compiz? kde 4.1 has rather nice effects build in (which can be
> > > turned off easily in systemsettings).
> >
> > I mean multiple debates about KDE 4 and video-drivers.
>
> If y
On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:54:59 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> === On Saturday 04 October 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: ===
>
> > > I mean multiple debates about KDE 4 and video-drivers.
> >
> > If you have a recent-ish nvidia card, you might want to treat KDE4 as
> > experimental on your box t
On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:50:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 17:49]:
> > On Saturday 04 October 2008 16:19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > yes, this is the point where I am currently: Trying to unmerge these
> > > packages.
> > >
=== On Saturday 04 October 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: ===
> > I mean multiple debates about KDE 4 and video-drivers.
>
> If you have a recent-ish nvidia card, you might want to treat KDE4 as
> experimental on your box till you find the magic spell that gives you
> decent performance...
The
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 17:49]:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 16:19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > yes, this is the point where I am currently: Trying to unmerge these
> > packages.
> > It works physically, but after unmerging the stuff and redoing
> > a emerge
On Saturday 04 October 2008 16:19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> yes, this is the point where I am currently: Trying to unmerge these
> packages.
> It works physically, but after unmerging the stuff and redoing
> a emerge -pvuNDt (as I did to send you the list after trying to
> unmerge
On Saturday 04 October 2008 17:28:32 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > why compiz? kde 4.1 has rather nice effects build in (which can be turned
> > off easily in systemsettings).
>
> I mean multiple debates about KDE 4 and video-drivers.
If you have a recent-ish nvidia card, you might want to treat KDE4
On Saturday 04 October 2008 16:30:35 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have notice KDE 4.1.2 ebuilds were added to the official protage tree
> (still masked though). I'm interested in most brave KDE users' opinions wrt
> some concrete KDE apps' stability under KDE4 (in order of importance):
This
Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 16:49]:
> On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [blocks B ]
> I'm no expert on this, but to me this looks like you're running some
> unstable gnome/gtk packages? This particular line reminds me of this
> quite fresh bug at bugs.gen
Volker, thanks!
=== On Saturday 04 October 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: ===
> > Kima applet
>
> doesn't exist
>
> > KNetLoad applet (if it works at all)
>
> don't even know if it exists.
>
>
> for the two above: there are countless plasmoids, just look around.
As far as I have not KD
On Samstag 04 Oktober 2008, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have notice KDE 4.1.2 ebuilds were added to the official protage tree
> (still masked though). I'm interested in most brave KDE users' opinions wrt
> some concrete KDE apps' stability under KDE4 (in order of importance):
>
> KMail (with
On 10/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [blocks B ] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239490
Maybe some of your unstable gnome stuff is causing some weird
side-effects? What if this gnome's unstable gail- and gtk+-related
issue is first fixed by that hint in that bug's
Hi!
I have notice KDE 4.1.2 ebuilds were added to the official protage tree
(still masked though). I'm interested in most brave KDE users' opinions wrt
some concrete KDE apps' stability under KDE4 (in order of importance):
KMail (without IMAP using)
Krusader 2.x (core, without 'Useractions')
Ph
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 16:14]:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:23:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 15:19]:
> > > On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:08:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > some time ago I asked what to d
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:23:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 15:19]:
> > On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:08:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > some time ago I asked what to do if kde blocks kde...
> > > The according HowTo (emergeing from
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-04 15:19]:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:08:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some time ago I asked what to do if kde blocks kde...
> > The according HowTo (emergeing from monolithic
> > to split kde install) says one has first
> > to unmerge th
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:08:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago I asked what to do if kde blocks kde...
> The according HowTo (emergeing from monolithic
> to split kde install) says one has first
> to unmerge the old monolithic installation of
> kde and the install the split s
Hi,
some time ago I asked what to do if kde blocks kde...
The according HowTo (emergeing from monolithic
to split kde install) says one has first
to unmerge the old monolithic installation of
kde and the install the split stuff.
But regardless what I am doing...
emerge -C
shows me a rmoving ac
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:50 +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> I'm looking for a Linux password strength checker, and so far I found
> this GPLed Java-Script-based solution [1]. Could you please suggest
> other utilities to test the strength of passwords?
>
> Regards,
> Liviu
Reve
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, b.n. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, �Q� wrote:
> You didn't need this. It's for third-party e-builds, but you aren't
> using a third party e-build. The zip file came from Sun, but the
> ebuild is in the Gentoo portage tree.
>
> Ebuilds a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, �Q� wrote:
You didn't need this. It's for third-party e-builds, but you aren't
using a third party e-build. The zip file came from Sun, but the
ebuild is in the Gentoo portage tree.
Ebuilds are just scripts which portage uses to build the p
On Saturday 4 October 2008, 10:50, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> I'm looking for a Linux password strength checker, and so far I found
> this GPLed Java-Script-based solution [1]. Could you please suggest
> other utilities to test the strength of passwords?
If you are concerned that
Dear everyone,
I'm looking for a Linux password strength checker, and so far I found
this GPLed Java-Script-based solution [1]. Could you please suggest
other utilities to test the strength of passwords?
Regards,
Liviu
PS I'm curious whether such a JS password strength checker can be
ebuilt and
59 matches
Mail list logo
