When i login from console i have this error :
-bash: no job control in this shell
I don't know since i have this because i do not usually console login.
this is my .bashrc
# /etc/skel/.bashrc:
# $Header: /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/etc/skel/.bashrc,v 1.8
2003/02/28 15:45:35 azarah Exp
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got some documents that we use around the house, like a grocery
> shopping list, which we've used for a long time. Since upgrading a
> couple of days ago, one upgrade was OO 2.4, printing fails in Open
> Office Writer. Pr
I've got some documents that we use around the house, like a grocery
shopping list, which we've used for a long time. Since upgrading a
couple of days ago, one upgrade was OO 2.4, printing fails in Open
Office Writer. Printing in other applications seems to work fine.
I do see some messages in the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:43:04AM +0200, pat wrote:
> Problem is this line in the keyboard section:
> Option "XkbLayout" "us,cz"
>
> Simply, enabling another language disable switching to console (I've check it
> for another languages too). Ugh =8-()
>
> If someone is able to explain why that ha
Just to release some tensions, check it out:
http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/09/09/weekly-portion-of-linux-humor-6-pics/
--
#Joseph
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. September 2008 18:50:54 schrieb Matt Harrison:
> > And yes, if someone does break in and copy your pub/sec keypair, they
> > will have full ability to masquerade as you in signed and encrypted
> > emails.
>
> And that's of course
Am Dienstag, 9. September 2008 19:24:27 schrieb Grant:
> Can I configure this so that I don't have the two keys on the same
> system?
Well, on the machine where you created the key pair, you would have to export
one of them and then delete it from the local keyring. But why should you?
> I'd li
Create 2 couple of key.
one for remote, other for local.
Il giorno mar, 09/09/2008 alle 10.24 -0700, Grant ha scritto:
> >> It looks like I've imported a pub/sec keypair now. Should I remove
> >> the public key for security? Maybe I misunderstood from the beginning
> >> and having both keys on
Am Dienstag, 9. September 2008 18:50:54 schrieb Matt Harrison:
> And yes, if someone does break in and copy your pub/sec keypair, they
> will have full ability to masquerade as you in signed and encrypted emails.
And that's of course only true if the secret key is protected with a weak or
no pas
Grant wrote:
Can I configure this so that I don't have the two keys on the same
system? I'd like encrypt with my remote system and decrypt with my
local system. Is that possible? It seems like importing my private
key also imports the public key.
I'm a bit confused as to what you're trying
Grant wrote:
My understanding of GPG is weak. Can someone point out my misconception(s)?
Speaking from a purely practical standpoint, keeping your private and
public keys completely separate is extremely inconvenient with (IMO) a
negligible security benefit.
However, there is arguably a m
>> It looks like I've imported a pub/sec keypair now. Should I remove
>> the public key for security? Maybe I misunderstood from the beginning
>> and having both keys on the same system isn't a security issue?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>
> It is still a security issue, but only as much as any other data o
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 18:50, Matt Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks like I've imported a pub/sec keypair now. Should I remove
>> the public key for security? Maybe I misunderstood from the beginning
>> and having both keys on the same system isn't a security issue?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
> It looks like I've imported a pub/sec keypair now. Should I remove
> the public key for security? Maybe I misunderstood from the beginning
> and having both keys on the same system isn't a security issue?
>
> - Grant
>
It is still a security issue, but only as much as any other data on your
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 18:40, Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So if you encrypt something for yourself, you'll need your public key
>> to encrypt and your public key to decrypt.
>>
>
> Little correction, you need the PRIVATE key to decrypt. Everybody has the
> public key but since yo
>> I've been encrypting and decrypting email on the same remote server.
>> I was under the impression that this was a security risk because it
>> meant having the public and private keys on the same machine. I tried
>> importing the public key to my local system and decrypting via
>> enigmail but
So if you encrypt something for yourself, you'll need your public key
to encrypt and your public key to decrypt.
Little correction, you need the PRIVATE key to decrypt. Everybody has
the public key but since you don't want everybody to be able to decrypt,
it's done with the private key. But
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 18:09, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been encrypting and decrypting email on the same remote server.
> I was under the impression that this was a security risk because it
> meant having the public and private keys on the same machine. I tried
> importing the public
I've been encrypting and decrypting email on the same remote server.
I was under the impression that this was a security risk because it
meant having the public and private keys on the same machine. I tried
importing the public key to my local system and decrypting via
enigmail but I got "Error -
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:51:47 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> dovecot doesn't seem to have a log. How do I turn on logging for
> dovecot?
It's explained in the config comments, but turned off by default
# Log file to use for error messages, instead of sending them to syslog.
# /dev/stderr can b
perhaps the pcnet32 modules has a known bug around, I fixed the problem by
configuring VMware to simulate a "e1000" ethernet card. hope this would help
to those noobs.
tks
fei
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:42 PM, fei huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi: since I used to install Gentoo through a Uni
21 matches
Mail list logo
