On 30 Aug 2008, at 21:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
In retrospect, it would probably have been quicker if you went the
long way
round:
emerge -e world
Tried it. Kept dying and leaving a number of packages that I just
couldn't build.
Stroller.
Tomáš Krasničan wrote:
Hi,
you can manage your /etc/make.profile symlink by eselect (emerge -av
eselect) tool.
"Eselect is a tool for administration and configuration on Gentoo
systems. It provides consistent interface and tool names."
eselect profile list - lists available profiles on you
Hi,
you can manage your /etc/make.profile symlink by eselect (emerge -av
eselect) tool.
"Eselect is a tool for administration and configuration on Gentoo
systems. It provides consistent interface and tool names."
eselect profile list - lists available profiles on your system
eselect profile
Hi all,
I just did an emerge --sync and when I did 'emerge --pretend --update
--deep world', I got told that my profile was deprecated.
I was told to run the following steps:
# cd /etc/
# rm make.profile
# ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 make.profile
I just want to ma
On Saturday 30 August 2008 16:59:02 Stroller wrote:
> but when I
> had the libexpat.so.0 error the only thing that worked (having
> followed a number of different advices posted here) was to rebuild
> EVERY outdated package on my system - a total numbering in the region
> of 250. I wouldn't
On Saturday 30 August 2008 16:59:02 Stroller wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:56, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > The main reason these packages are behind at all is that they are
> > usually
> > build dependencies, not run dependencies. They will only be updated
> > with
> > emerge -uD when something that
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:10:27 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> It just seems more effective than `emerge -D
> world` - that seems to miss many packages.
The packages is misses are either build-time dependencies, so don't need
updating, or are not dependencies of anything in world and would be
removed by
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:26:51 -0400, John covici wrote:
> What is the advantage of conf-update over cfg-update which I have been
> using for quite a while?
I like it, try it you might like it. If you don't, you haven't lost
anything :)
Honestly, it's been so long since I tried cfg-update, I can't
Geralt wrote:
Hi,
why still using RCS for version control when there's git? :-)
I dunno. I didn't know about the other until a bit ago. o_O
Dale
:-) :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> have fun
|> Tom
| Thanks for the update. Slightly OT and planning ahead slightly, any
| ideas how easy it will be to upgrade from the kdesvn-portage overlay to
| the official ebuilds?
If everything goes as planned, as easy as emerge -u :)
|
| Ch
On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:56, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The main reason these packages are behind at all is that they are
usually
build dependencies, not run dependencies. They will only be updated
with
emerge -uD when something that depends on them is rebuilt.
To avoid this, use 'emerge --with-bde
On Saturday 30 August 2008 06:10:27 Stroller wrote:
> First question: is 'emerge -1 `eix -Iu --only-names`' a useful
> command for updating packages not in the world file? Or is this usage
> of mine to be avoided? It just seems more effective than `emerge -D
> world` - that seems to miss many
on Saturday 08/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
>
> > > # etc-update
> > > [...]
> > > File: /etc/portage/._cfg_package.use
> > > [...]
> > > What is it about?
> >
> > No, I didn't see it, but it looks like
On Saturday 30 August 2008 13:02:10 Tomas Papan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a router (asus wl500gp with openwrt kamikaze 7.09) with samba server
> version 2.0.10-4. I have used smbfs to mount this router on my gentoo-box
> (everything works fine), but since kernel version 2.6.27 smbfs will be
>
Hello all,
I have a router (asus wl500gp with openwrt kamikaze 7.09) with samba server
version 2.0.10-4. I have used smbfs to mount this router on my gentoo-box
(everything works fine), but since kernel version 2.6.27 smbfs will be
removed I have to switch now to the cifs modul. The problem is
Hi,
why still using RCS for version control when there's git? :-)
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday 30 August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
>>>
>
> # etc-up
Mick wrote:
On Saturday 30 August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
# etc-update
[...]
File: /etc/portage/._cfg_package.use
[...]
What is it about?
No, I didn't see it, but it looks like some package moved to another
cate
Matthias Bethke schrieb:
Hi Florian,
on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:29:07PM +0200, you wrote:
Note1: NEVER EVER build some kind of RAID other than "Linear" (also called
JBOD) over two IDE disks on the same cable. Performance will suffer greatly
as will security because most simple onboard controlle
On Saturday 30 August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
> > > # etc-update
> > > [...]
> > > File: /etc/portage/._cfg_package.use
> > > [...]
> > > What is it about?
> >
> > No, I didn't see it, but it looks like some package moved to anothe
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
> > # etc-update
> > [...]
> > File: /etc/portage/._cfg_package.use
> > [...]
> > What is it about?
>
> No, I didn't see it, but it looks like some package moved to another
> category or got renamed so portage patched package.use f
20 matches
Mail list logo
