Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Chris Walters:
> Also, someone said that it was possible to encrypt using multiple
> passphrases using dm-crypt.
That was me. To be correct: I wrote that with LUKS (which is based on
dm-crypt) it is possible to use multiple keys (a key may be a passphrase o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks to all who replied to my previous question. This question is related.
Has anyone gotten the 'extra-ciphers' (you can get them from the loop-aes site)
to compile with the loop-aes kernel patch in place? If so, could you give me a
hint on how
Joerg Schilling ha scritto:
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jörg, you appear to be making a fundamental error of assumption. It
looks like you consider that simply because you think this matter
important (and in your life it probably IS important), that therefore
it must be important
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728
Long long Long LONG standing bug.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surg
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:47:56 -0400, Peter Wood wrote:
> Now, whenever I do revdep-rebuild, gcc gets reemerged. Does anybody
> have a better idea, than to change my USE flags and reemerge gcc
> without the 'gcj' flag set?
This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728
Hi,
yesterday I tried emerging pdftk and was instructed by the emerge output
to add 'gcj' to my USE flags. I did that, reemerged gcc and was able to
emerge pdftk just fine.
Now, whenever I do revdep-rebuild, gcc gets reemerged. Does anybody have
a better idea, than to change my USE flags and re
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:23:45 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:32:57 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
> > quickpkg is exactly what I was looking for.
>
> You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a
> binary package for every package you ins
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:39:12 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > treat Virtual Machines # emerge -at gnucash
> > >
> > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reve
Neil Bothwick writes:
> You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a binary
> package for every package you install. It can use a fair amount of disk
> space, but it means you can always roll back from a broken version, even
> if you managed to break portage.
And there's also
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:32:57 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> quickpkg is exactly what I was looking for.
You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a binary
package for every package you install. It can use a fair amount of disk
space, but it means you can always roll back from
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:41:12 +0100
Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you may remember my problems with lvm after an update in
> http://www.archivum.info/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/2008-04/msg00899.html
>
> I'm now headed back towards the same situation. I have
Thanks Alex, this is also useful to me. I'm fresh here.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Iliev asks:
>
> > Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
> > backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restor
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:54:09 +0200
Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Iliev asks:
>
> > Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to
> > make a backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better
> > restore.
> >
> > What is (is there?) the "Gentoo way" to
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg, you appear to be making a fundamental error of assumption. It
> looks like you consider that simply because you think this matter
> important (and in your life it probably IS important), that therefore
> it must be important in mine. This is not
Ivan Alden gmail.com> writes:
> I am trying to compile the ATI proprietary drivers for my DELL D600 lap.
> I found in a web search that the last working drivers for this card was
> the 8.28.8 version.
H,
I got this version installed and working:
Installed versions: 8.493(14:40:42 05/28/0
Daniel Iliev asks:
> Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
> backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restore.
>
> What is (is there?) the "Gentoo way" to do that?
Let's assume you upgrade from package/foo-1.0 to package/foo-1.1. You can
then us
Hi,
Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restore.
What is (is there?) the "Gentoo way" to do that?
--
Best regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
el 2008-06-23 a las 14:58 Joerg Schilling escribió:
> Cdrecord is known to work with all drives and media. Other software
> may have problems with some drives or media.
that's exactly my personal experience. i won't comment about license
issues, because although i always try to support "free" so
On 23 Jun 2008, at 19:54, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
The license of the original cdrtools has been examined by
specialized lawyers
and these lawyers did not see any license problem in the original
software.
A bit of Googling lead me to a couple of articles which appear to
indicate you c
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Continuing to use cdrkit affords me that luxury of not getting
> > involved, so I can carry on blissfully not caring and instead
> > devote my energies to the projects I do care about.
>
> Things are not
2008/6/24 Zhou Rui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for your help, but I'm still puzzled with the madwifi driver and the
> build-in ath5k driver. Does it mean
> if I choose to install a madwifi driver I can still use my 2.6.24 kernel?
Though ath5k driver will eventually replace the madwifi driver
acc
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuing to use cdrkit affords me that luxury of not getting involved,
> so I can carry on blissfully not caring and instead devote my energies
> to the projects I do care about.
Things are not as simple as you seem to believe.
You cannot stay off t
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Zhou Rui:
> I'm using gentoo in my UMPC fujitsu U1010 which has a Atheros superG
> wireless card. I found the wiki says there is a kernel option can
> compile Atheros 5xxx WLAN driver into the kernel, but I cannot find it in
> my kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r5 (emeged
Thanks for your help, but I'm still puzzled with the madwifi driver and the
build-in ath5k driver. Does it mean
if I choose to install a madwifi driver I can still use my 2.6.24 kernel?
But the problem is I cannot find the "non-hamradio
WLAN" option in current kernel either...
-邮件原件-
发件人:
Greets,
I never used beagle so far, only recently read an article about it and
thought I would give it a try, so I emerged it yesterday.
So I have app-misc/beagle-0.2.18 now, with USE-flags "eds gtk pdf python
thunderbird xscreensaver", along
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.14 ...
A
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Matt Harrison wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> | On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:32:33 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote:
> |> Sorry for replying to my own message, just had a thought. Could
> |> this all be a udev rules problem? I mean could some new rules in
> |> the updated udev package
26 matches
Mail list logo
