On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Andrey Falko wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> > > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level
> > > for X11? (this makes all graphical software run much fas
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked
> against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch.
There is no such thing as gcc 3.4.9.
> It happened
> with gcc 4.2.2, I emerged 4.2.3 and it still happens. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If so what is the massive chinese interest in icq?
found this in the net:
http://www.grc.com/port_1026.htm
http://www.grc.com/port_1027.htm
That doesn't give any analysis of why this port is being hammered by
h
> -Original Message-
> From: PaulNM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:25 AM
>
> de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
>
> > Verifying archive integrity... All good.
> > Uncompressing VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions for Linux
installation
> >
>
>
> Well, first I'd
On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:42:39 -0400
"Andrey Falko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> > > X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
> > > when I used Debian).
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> >
> > If I
I have been battling this weirdness for several months, and it has
been getting worse and worse. Now I can't even unpack half the man
pages.
The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked
against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch. It happened
with gcc 4.2.2, I eme
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 21:50:24 +0200
>
> "Abraham Gyorgy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> > X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, a
On Tue, 13 May 2008 21:50:24 +0200
"Abraham Gyorgy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
> when I used Debian).
>
> Thanks in advance
If I wanted to change the nicenes
On Tue, 13 May 2008 10:06:39 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I think you should, as long as nothing system-critical is listed, and
> > emerge shouts loudly about removing those.
> >
>
> On a long list of packages to be cleaned I find it comforting to use
>
> emerge -C package1 package2 package3
On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:18:42 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I somehow doubt that firefox will cease to work if I unmerge
> libgnomeui.
So what if it does? It not like it will stop your computer booting and is
nothing a revdep-rebuild couldn't fix.
--
Neil Bothwick
668 - The neighbour of th
Andrey Falko wrote:
Ahh I see. I don't know much about MTRR...all I know is that you can
adjust them via grub:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=10
Hmm... I missed that one. Thanks.
My grub kernel command line (which I haven't given much thought to since
it's
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > > Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
>> > > option, or that they were pulled
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you should, as long as nothing system-critical is listed, and
> emerge shouts loudly about removing those.
>
I think your are probably right...
>> For example, one of the listed pkgs is:
>>
>> gnome-base/libgnomeui
>>
>> which equery says `
On Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
> (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
> Debian).
which is how many years ago?
really, with a recent kernel&X you more likely HURT perform
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> > X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
> > when I used Debian).
>
> Nice factor for X makes graphical softwa
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> > X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
> > when I used Debian).
>
> Nice fa
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Abraham Gyorgy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
> (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
> Debian).
>
> Thanks in advance
>
If you run startx, I think you can do s
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
> when I used Debian).
Nice factor for X makes graphical software run fater? I don't thinl
so. Not at all.
Uwe
-
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:50 +0200, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
> X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when
> I used Debian).
I forget, but I tried it a while back and didn't see positive results.
In my expe
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).
Thanks in advance
Sun, 11 May 2008 23:53:19 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 01:05:56 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
> > So, please, check what your /etc/fstab reads about "/" in case you
> > have accidentally overwritten it by answering "yes" to etc-update or
> > dispatch-conf.
>
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
> > > option, or that they were pulled in as a dependency of a package you
> > > no lo
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
> > option, or that they were pulled in as a dependency of a package you
> > no longer have (or has been updated to a version that is no longer
> > dependent on them). W
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
>> appears not to know much about them.
>
> Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
> in my make.conf file
It does want to upgrade one of the pkgs with tha
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:18:33 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
>> > appears not to know much about them.
>>
>> Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
>> i
Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If so what is the massive chinese interest in icq?
>>
>>
> found this in the net:
>
> http://www.grc.com/port_1026.htm
> http://www.grc.com/port_1027.htm
That doesn't give any analysis of why this port is being hammered by
hundreds, even thousands of IP or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On on a cable provider (comcast).
My router shows a constant hammering from numerious chinese IPs on
port 1027 and 1026.
Its not really apparent what is going on .. looking at the date graph
presented here:
http://isc.sans.org/port.html?port=1027
Other google hits
On on a cable provider (comcast).
My router shows a constant hammering from numerious chinese IPs on
port 1027 and 1026.
Its not really apparent what is going on .. looking at the date graph
presented here:
http://isc.sans.org/port.html?port=1027
Other google hits don't say much about it eithe
On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:18:33 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
> > appears not to know much about them.
>
> Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
> in my make.conf file
>
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--wit
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and
> revdep-rebuild I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed
> below.
> What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
> ones that show `U' should have gotten upd
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:05 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and revdep-rebuild
> I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed below.
> What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
> ones that show `U' should ha
Has anyone else noticed jwhois queries to have quit working?
I get
root # jwhois 128.111.24.43
[Querying whois.arin.net]
[Error creating socket]
[Unable to connect to remote host]
If I change the default server, still get the same message.
Changing to alpha style notation:
jwhois ftp.u
When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and revdep-rebuild
I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed below.
What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
ones that show `U' should have gotten updated during ... -vuD world.
root # emerge -vp dev-lang/n
Alan McKinnon wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/%22loopback-mount%22-hard-drive-image-created-w
ith-dd--td14945355.html
He doesn't want to mount a dd'ed *filesystem* as a loopback device, he
wants to mount a single filesystem out of several which is inside an
entire diskimage file.
losetup won'
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, PaulNM wrote:
> Even better would be losetup from sys-apps/util-linux.
>
> see:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/%22loopback-mount%22-hard-drive-image-created-w
>ith-dd--td14945355.html
He doesn't want to mount a dd'ed *filesystem* as a loopback device, he
wants to mount a singl
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Martin Lehmann wrote:
Now the problem is, that this is a image of a whole hdd. I only need
one partition out of it.
Then i want to copy the content of this partition to a partition
located of the "real" hdd
A brute force approach, but probably the e
Arthur Britto wrote:
You likely want more than a minute. Most likely, you don't want your
system to crash when coming back up when power fails soon after it is
restored: your system could be in the middle of a fsck. Generally, you
want enough capacity to: power off, power on, and then power o
de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions for Linux installation
...
VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions installation
Which: no dkms in
(/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin...)
Building
> > > Sorry, I don't see how firmware can affect sensitivity. I've
> > > been involved in writing firmware for RF data communications
> > > stuff for a long time, and I've certainly never been able to
> > > affect sensitivity.
> > >
> >
> > I can say that I was really struggling to get a reliab
39 matches
Mail list logo
