On Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I've figured out how to force a hard lockup on my system, by trying to
> log on to my ADSL service when the modem is switched off. Yeah, I know...
> Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do that.
> Doctor: In that case... *DON'T DO THAT*.
>
> Dur
I've figured out how to force a hard lockup on my system, by trying to
log on to my ADSL service when the modem is switched off. Yeah, I know...
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do that.
Doctor: In that case... *DON'T DO THAT*.
During one such lockup, I discovered that Magic SysRq doesn't wor
Hi group,
>From sourceforge.net I downloaded
brlcad_7.10.4_ia32.tar.bz2 and untarred it. In INSTALL
it says to run ./configure and if there is no
configure script to run autogen.sh. I found neither
but back at sourceforge found autogen.sh
Which lead to this:
A configure.ac or configure.in file c
On Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:27:58AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > but you also know a little more than you did yesterday. That's the main
> > thing!
>
> I know how I misthought things. I had thought USB was a dumb protocol
> and that the
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:38:30 -0200, Raphael wrote:
> I believe that a good solution would be evolving Portage to use
> different forms of storage, like databases or even LDAP. In a home
> desktop, you could use SQLite, which is light weight. In a Office
> enviroment, you could use a larger da
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:27:58AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> but you also know a little more than you did yesterday. That's the main
> thing!
I know how I misthought things. I had thought USB was a dumb protocol
and that the simplest way to present two drives on one connection was
to have an
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 07:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll be the son of a monkey's uncle.
>
> Tie me ankles and put me knickers in a twist.
*lol* no thanks, wrong list!
> It WAS the CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN kernel flag.
>
> Apologies to all those who thought I was doubting them. I was,
On 22:11 Mon 17 Dec , Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
> OK then, I have been using CFQ for the last few days and it 'feels' slower
> (when e.g. I fire up Kmail, Opera and aterm in quick succession) relative to
> anticipatory which I was using before.
> --
> R
On Dec 17, 2007 5:53 AM, Alexander Skwar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I
> > suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here.
>
> Is that actually true (especially for the Portage case)? I'd
> suspect that portage sometimes tends to be
On Sunday 16 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
> On 18:36 Sun 16 Dec , Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
> > > On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choic
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> Mmmh, so you think it could be software after all?
No, if the light on the firewall and on the NIC itself don't come on
when you plug in the ethernet cable, the card isn't working. When
a different slot doesn't work either, it seems something on your
PCI bus is dead. D
>Daniel wrote:
> > $ eix cdrtools
> >Installed versions: 2.01.01_alpha34(19:08:15 16/12/07)
> Uninstall this. Install cdrkit instead. Then try K3b again.
If you like to replace a working program by something that does not work
go ahead and replace cdrecord by wodim.
If you
Hi all.
I tried to emerge coot-0.3.3 with new-interface which failed
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202599). Now I recognised that
at my office computer, which is basically of the same software setup,
coot emerged with the 1.99 version of gtkglarea.
My question now is, how can I easily com
On Dec 15, 2007 8:37 AM, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since you seem to have checked that the problem is not related to
> cables/NICs/modem/router - does the machine work fine otherwise? If you had
> bad memory/fs corruption during your download when the NIC failed it may be
> that you need t
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
>What tools would I want to look into so that I could scan my
> network to determine all the devices currently on it, either by IP or
> name?
Something simple
emerge fping
fping -g 192.168.37.0/24
or fping -g 10.168.1.0 10.168.1.255
I'd recomend only usi
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is this about? The log cited contains only the lines shown and
>> no other logs are present there
>>
>>
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-625682-highlight-violation+summary+sandbox.html
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-604376-highlight-vi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> ---
> LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-26803.log"
>
> open_rd: /root/.bash_history
> open_rd: /root/.bash_history
> ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml
>>
>> That help any? It's not like you are the first to do something like
>> this. LOL
>>
>
> Ok Whew.. now recovered portage and re-emerged portage
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml
>
> That help any? It's not like you are the first to do something like
> this. LOL
Ok Whew.. now recovered portage and re-emerged portage-2.1.4_rc1
using the hand installed portage most
Sorry for the second post on this, but if it helps...
My /var/log/messages contains the following after loading the bcm43xx driver.
Dec 17 10:20:38 spyro kernel: bcm43xx driver
Dec 17 10:20:38 spyro kernel: bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4306, rev 0x3
Dec 17 10:20:38 spyro kernel: bcm43xx: Number of cores:
On Monday 17 December 2007 04:30:16 am Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Hello Marzan,
>
> I have the same wifi card and tryed the same methods to get it working
> and nothing. I'am using ndiswrapper right now, just until I can find a
> way to make it work. Any news gonna mail our list.
>
> []'s
>
> On Dec 13
On Monday 17 December 2007 16:14:24 Raphael wrote:
> Hey, I made someone laugh today. Good deed of the day: check! :P
:)
> I was unaware of Paludis. Re-reading the thread now, I saw that
> someone mentioned it. After googling for it, seems a lot of people are
> fond of it. Why is it not the defau
On Dec 17, 2007 12:20 PM, Bo Ãrsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2007 14:38:30 Raphael wrote:
> > So, even if Portage was recoded in C++, performance improvements
> > would be marginal and the cost in man-hours would be too high. It
> > would take months before r
I'll be the son of a monkey's uncle.
Tie me ankles and put me knickers in a twist.
It WAS the CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN kernel flag.
Apologies to all those who thought I was doubting them. I was, and I
shouldn't have.
I am flabbergasted.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . ._
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, Raphael wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:55 AM, Hemmann, Volker Armin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > *removedlotsofideas*
>
> ??
>
> > your ideas sound nice on paper. But one strenght of portage and its
> > structures: no matter how hosed your 'data', you can repair it
On Dec 17, 2007 11:55 AM, Hemmann, Volker Armin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *removedlotsofideas*
??
> your ideas sound nice on paper. But one strenght of portage and its
> structures: no matter how hosed your 'data', you can repair it with cp, mv,
> an emerge sync and a text editor.
>
> Which is
Grant wrote:
>> Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
>> at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
>> things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to
>> be the closest relation, but even that won't do.
On Monday 17 December 2007 14:38:30 Raphael wrote:
> So, even if Portage was recoded in C++, performance improvements
> would be marginal and the cost in man-hours would be too high. It
> would take months before reaching the maturity level Portage has now
> and all this time could be better sp
Em Sunday 16 December 2007 22:43:08 Daniel escreveu:
> I had some .avi's that I wanted to burn, so I went out and bought a 10pack
> of Fujifilm DVD-R media (4.7GB) and fired up K3b. However, it kept asking
> me to insert a writable disk even though I put fresh disk after fresh disk
> in the drive.
*removedlotsofideas*
your ideas sound nice on paper. But one strenght of portage and its
structures: no matter how hosed your 'data', you can repair it with cp, mv,
an emerge sync and a text editor.
Which is all not true, if you start using some database crap.
Go, look at /var/db/pkg - you can
Hi everyone,
I don't think the programming language is the problem here. The
problem is that some of Portage architectural decisions have a
negative impact on performance. Probably because the developers were
focused on minimizing dependencies (i.e. file system based
persistence) and bandwidth
A nice program for generating hosts list [amongst many other features]
is nast, try nast -m for a host list.
You could also look at Nessus which while being a vuln scanner it will
probably provide simpler information that you are after.
As for having it monitor and report times at which something n
On (17/12/07 11:29) Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > What does everyone else think about this. Is portage a major blocker
> > of progress or not so much?
>
> As said above, details are major blockers of progress.
>
> On the other hand, when I switched to paludis, 100 MB
> of unnecessary packages suddenly
Daniel wrote:
> $ eix cdrtools
>Installed versions: 2.01.01_alpha34(19:08:15 16/12/07)
Uninstall this. Install cdrkit instead. Then try K3b again.
Benno
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> What does everyone else think about this. Is portage a major blocker
> of progress or not so much?
As said above, details are major blockers of progress.
On the other hand, when I switched to paludis, 100 MB
of unnecessary packages suddenly were available to delete.
So, paludis must do somethi
You wrote
> I had some .avi's that I wanted to burn, so I went out and bought a 10pack of
> Fujifilm DVD-R media (4.7GB) and fired up K3b. However, it kept asking me to
> insert a writable disk even though I put fresh disk after fresh disk in the
> drive.
>
> So I resorted to growisofs. I ha
David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
> suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here.
Is that actually true (especially for the Portage case)? I'd
suspect that portage sometimes tends to be slow, because of
the myriad of files it has to deal with. So it's I/O which is
slo
Hello Marzan,
I have the same wifi card and tryed the same methods to get it working
and nothing. I'am using ndiswrapper right now, just until I can find a
way to make it work. Any news gonna mail our list.
[]'s
On Dec 13, 2007 6:53 PM, Marzan, Richard non Unisys
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:34:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alternatively, you could do the same with the in-kernel ecryptfs.
> > These two solutions work in much the same way, allowing you to mount
> > individual directories with their own passwords, so you could have a
> > single /home with
39 matches
Mail list logo
