There is no harm in doing so :)
Hello, you probably have a recent chipset (blanking on name currently) which
is recent such that support is not yet present in the linux kernel...
Hi guys!
I can't boot my dell1400 laptop from livecd.Here is output:
>> Making tmpfd for /newroot
>> Attempting to mount media:- /dev/sda
>> Attempting to mount media:- /dev/sda1
>> Attempting to mount media:- /dev/sda2
>> Attempting to mount media:- /dev/sda3
>> Attempting to mount media:- /dev/
> > This sort of error is often fixed by re-emerging openjade.
> I've re emerged jadetex openjade, but still have the same
> problem. I can
> masked it temporaly in /etc/portage/package.use, Thanks!
I also tried re-emerging openjade with no result. I re-emerged an sgml
package and that fixed it.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Dale,
>
>
>>> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
>>> you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
>>> not the standard man/info pages.
>>>
>
>
>> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc
I believe there is some rule concerning the versions of gentoo-sources
vs linux-headers. Could someone please remind me of the rule or
correct my impression that such a rule exists?
I am running 2.6.20-gentoo-r7 but have installed 2.6.22-r8
emerge --verbose --ask --deep --update --newuse --tree
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:10:26 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > You could set it in /etc/portage/package.use for individual packages
> > as they come up for upgrade, then change it globally and rebuild when
> > you have the time. It's not as though the system can't be used while
> > emerging and
On Saturday 06 October 2007 21:01:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > > not the standard man/info pages.
> >
> > It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:32:31 Dale wrote:
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
> > normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the
> > standard man/info pages.
>
> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my
Hello Dale,
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > not the standard man/info pages.
> Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line
> and I thought it was for t
Hello Wang, Baojun,
> > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package,
> > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation,
> > not the standard man/info pages.
> It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very beginning, now
> if I remove the "doc
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:02:29PM -0500, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> >> An alternative would be to get hold of a regionless firmware somewhere on
> >> the internet and flash the drive with that, but this is most likely
> >> illegal
> >> in your country under the DMCA.
> >>
> >
> > rpc1.org
On Saturday 06 October 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Wang, Baojun,
>
> > I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to
> > libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag "doc", it will be ok with "-doc":
>
> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
> normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the
> standard man/info pages.
>
>
Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line
and I thought it wa
Hello Wang, Baojun,
> I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to
> libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag "doc", it will be ok with "-doc":
Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you
normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentat
Liviu Andronic schrieb:
> On 10/5/07, Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is an option in baselayout's rc file to erase the swap at
>> shutdown. Take a look at /etc/conf.d/rc under RC_SWAP_ERASE.
>
> As far as I understand, this is far from secure. You want at least
> some degree
16 matches
Mail list logo
