Hello!
I'm trying to compile kopete, but this failed:
* To support Video4Linux webcams in this package is required to have
* =x11-libs/qt-3* compiled with OpenGL support.
* Please reemerge =x11-libs/qt-3* with USE="opengl".
!!! ERROR: kde-base/kopete-3.5.3-r2 failed.
Qt3 is installed with th
szerda 26 július 2006 08.21 dátummal Donnie Berkholz ezt írta:
> Stefán István wrote:
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r8 USE="bitmap-fonts dlloader
ipv6
> > nls opengl pam truetype-fonts type1-fonts xv -3dfx -3dnow -cjk -debug -dmx
> > -doc -fon
Stefán István wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r8 USE="bitmap-fonts dlloader ipv6
> nls opengl pam truetype-fonts type1-fonts xv -3dfx -3dnow -cjk -debug -dmx
> -doc -font-server -insecure-drivers -minimal -mmx* -nocxx -sdk -sse* -static
> -xp
kedd 25 július 2006 22.43 dátummal Richard Fish ezt írta:
> On 7/25/06, Stefán István <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Meanwhile I was able to install the ati-drivers by adding
> > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to emerge and install the latest version in
portage.
> > But now X doesn't start, and I find the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> gentuxx wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting
> some
> >> funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get:
> >>
> >> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-java/kaff
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RF> > How the developers are informed about packages that should go to
RF> > stable? Is there posibility for developers to easily find these
RF> > packages or get
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:08:19PM -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote
> >I think eth0 is your FireWire port (IEEE 1394).
> >
> >You did the right thing already (taking eth0 down). Now you can
> >install Gentoo and unless you configure support for Ethernet over
> >FireWire (or something similar) in your
> How about ~/.xsession-errors?It is empty (0 bytes)Nadav
I followed the instructions from the forum (listed below)
I built the driver and networking code as modules as specified.
(I also tried building them into the kernel with essentially the same
bad results).
I would appreciate any help. Details follow.
allan
The guide recommended wl_apsta.o for fi
Zac Medico wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> >> That was for future reference. If in the future you are seeing it copy
> >> the install over and power fails, then you may need to re-emerge it and
> >> be ready for "issues". I'm not really sure what those would be
> though.
> >> It may work just fine, it may
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:11:50 +0100
Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 25 July 2006 01:37, Nick Rout wrote:
>
> Audio is now working with PVR-150. Thanks, Nick, for all your input.
>
> Problem is, I don't know why and I hate it when magic is part of IT. ;-)
>
> The whole difference between yesterday and tod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> That was for future reference. If in the future you are seeing it copy
> the install over and power fails, then you may need to re-emerge it and
> be ready for "issues". I'm not really sure what those would be though.
> It may work jus
Mick schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 19:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Grant schrieb:
>> > I thought this
>> > thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
>>
>> You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
>> IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
>> y
On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How the developers are informed about packages that should go to
stable? Is there posibility for developers to easily find these
packages or get some notification about it?
Developers are generally expected to keep track of the packages th
On 7/25/06, Stefán István <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Meanwhile I was able to install the ati-drivers by adding
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to emerge and install the latest version in portage.
But now X doesn't start, and I find the following in the log file:
Do you have the dri use flag set for xorg
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 7/25/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > Now if I could just get the machine to work properly I'd be in heaven!
>> > ;-)
>> >
>> > Cheers all,
>> > Mark
>>
>> Keep in mind that when it is compiling that it is done in a temporary
>> location. Af
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 19:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Grant schrieb:
> >> > I thought this
> >> > thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
> >>
> >> You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
> >> IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
> >> you'
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:35, Stefán István wrote:
> kedd 25 július 2006 21.28 dátummal Mick ezt írta:
> > Also, if you have "userpriv" in your FEATURES= in /etc/make.conf remove
> > it
>
> and
>
> > then emerge -resume. It may work . . . after that you can re-instate it.
>
> Thanks, but I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gentuxx wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting some
> funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get:
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-java/kaffe-1.4".
> (dependency required by "net
On 7/25/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Now if I could just get the machine to work properly I'd be in heaven!
> ;-)
>
> Cheers all,
> Mark
Keep in mind that when it is compiling that it is done in a temporary
location. After the compile is done, then it copies it ov
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 21:10, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > There are some differences with mine there, besides the two corrupt
> > files. I'm none the wiser with this problem. :-(
>
> Mine is different too:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -la /usr/lib/X11/
> total 135
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root r
kedd 25 július 2006 21.28 dátummal Mick ezt írta:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 19:32, Richard Fish wrote:
>
> > 8.21.7 seems quite old to me, especially to try and use with a new
> > kerrnel. Can you try something more recent, like 8.26.18-r1? You'll
> > have to accept the ~arch keyword for this:
>
kedd 25 július 2006 20.58 dátummal Ptitjack ezt írta:
> Stefán István a gentiment tapote:
> > !!! ERROR: x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.21.7-r1 failed.
> > Call stack:
> > ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_install
> > ebuild.sh, line 1013: Called src_install
> > ati-drivers-8.21.7-r1.ebuild, li
Stefán István a gentiment tapote:
> !!! ERROR: x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.21.7-r1 failed.
> Call stack:
> ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_install
> ebuild.sh, line 1013: Called src_install
> ati-drivers-8.21.7-r1.ebuild, line 182: Called linux-mod_src_install
> linux-mod.eclass, line
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 7/24/06, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > What is my best course of action at this point? The machine booted
>> > fine so I could start over. I also saved an old email from Zac Medico
>>
Meanwhile I was able to install the ati-drivers by adding
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to emerge and install the latest version in portage.
But now X doesn't start, and I find the following in the log file:
Required symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/lib/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.o is
unresolved!
Symbol
> I thought this
> thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
you'll need to use some SMTP server to get your mail out. But
with the /usr/sbin/sendmail interface, it
On 7/25/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:18 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > test and [ are not links to each other as they have different syntax
> > (the closing ]), so they cannot be the same command. If they were
> > linked, one of them would fail on executi
Hello,is that the newest version in portage? if not i would sujest upgrading as each version of ati-drivers is only good for certian kernelsCynyrOn 7/25/06,
Stefán István <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!I have a big problem installing ati driver. Please somebody help.When I try to install it I ge
Grant schrieb:
>> So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
>>
>> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
>
> I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working.
How is it not working? What's in the logs?
There is nothing in /var/log/mail/ and I can't find anything in
/va
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:18 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> test and [ are not links to each other as they have different syntax
> (the closing ]), so they cannot be the same command. If they were
> linked, one of them would fail on execution with invalid syntax
errors
This
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:52:04 -0700, Grant wrote:
> > You need to configure ssmtp. Did you do so?
>
> Looking over /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf, it seems like I need to configure
> the mailhub variable? I want to make sure I'm setting up as simple a
> system for getting this elog mail out as possible.
Hello!
I have a big problem installing ati driver. Please somebody help.
When I try to install it I get a huge error message:
localhost fglrx # emerge -v ati-drivers
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.21.7-r1 to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums ;-)
>>
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
This won't work. Apache doesn't have inbuilt chroot facilities, AFAIK.
Like most of the other standard internet services. You would have to
setup a chroot env (all dependant libraries and stuff) for that. But
there's nothing similar to a chroot automatic in apache. BTW,
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 11:37, Richard Fish wrote:
man, you are awesome thank you very much. i've re-emerged net-tools and
all is perfect nowthank you again!!!
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I've looked through the sources for ifconfig (net-tools-1.60), and
> based on the strace output you provided, I
Hi reader,
on Tuesday, 2006-07-25 at 00:03:45, you wrote:
> Three or more windows XP boxes that are devoted primarily to editing
> video or graphics in one way or another. The stuff needing backup can
> be in really big files but also lots of normal sized still images etc.
>
> I'm planning to use
Hi Paul,
on Tuesday, 2006-07-25 at 10:45:31, you wrote:
> My gentoo box is set ok using ethtool. How do I check the setting on the
> windows xp box?
If the connection has a tray icon, double-clicking that should bring up
an info dialog that has the link speed somewhere. Otherwise you'll have
to c
>> So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
>>
>> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
>
> I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working.
How is it not working? What's in the logs?
There is nothing in /var/log/mail/ and I can't find anything in
/var/log/everything
On 7/25/06, louis brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/06, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some reason, the X86 minimal install CD sees ethernet ports
> according to the startup message. When I ifconfig after booting the
> install CD, it shows only eth1. I entered values in
On Monday 24 July 2006 23:04, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:11 +0200
>
> Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could someone please post the contents of your /usr/lib/X11/ dir for
> > comparison purposes?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -la /usr/lib/X11/
> total 164
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root
On 7/25/06, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some reason, the X86 minimal install CD sees ethernet ports
according to the startup message. When I ifconfig after booting the
install CD, it shows only eth1. I entered values into both eth0 and
eth1 via net-setup. It looks like eth1 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting some
funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get:
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-java/kaffe-1.4".
(dependency required by "net-dns/libidn-0.5.15" [ebuild])
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:33:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Um, no. Read my post again. The command 'test' and the command '[' have
> *different* syntax so cannot possible be links to each other and still
> have it work.
if [ $(basename $0) == "[" ]
then
#parse for trailing ]
else
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 16:33, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Um, no. Read my post again. The command 'test' and the command '['
> have *different* syntax so cannot possible be links to each other and
> still have it work. The command does behave differently depending on
> the name it is called with, but
As you probably read yesterday in GWN[1], Ethereal is being removed due to
security vulnerabilities[2] and replaced with its successor, Wireshark.
Ethereal, as far as anyone can tell, is no longer being developed[3] as all
the core developers have moved to Wireshark[4].
To make this transition
On 7/24/06, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knecht wrote:
> What is my best course of action at this point? The machine booted
> fine so I could start over. I also saved an old email from Zac Medico
> that suggested a command
>
> FEATURE
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:18 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > test and [ are not links to each other as they have different syntax
> > (the closing ]), so they cannot be the same command. If they were
> > linked, one of them would fail on execution with invalid syntax
> errors
>
> This is not 100% t
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:41:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The answer is simple:
Maye, but this isn't it.
> 'test' is a bash builtin. When a bash script executes 'test', it is
> not /usr/bin/test that runs, but a function internal to bash.
test and [ are both Bash builtins, but there are also [
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 15:16, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I was disagreeing with the "cant be the same" comment. I know they are
> different files, but the slightly different behaviour is insufficient
> reason for that. Alexander asked why one was not a link to the other,
> I'd like to know too, but t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:26:52 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>
>> > > You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is needed
>> > > by /usr/bin[ and not by /usr/bin/test
>> >
>> > It's quite common for a program to change its behaviour according to
>> > the name used
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:26:52 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>
>> > > > You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is needed
>> > > > by /usr/bin[ and not by /usr/bin/test
>> > >
>> > > It's quite common f
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 15:41, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The answer is simple:
>
> 'test' is a bash builtin. When a bash script executes 'test', it is
> not /usr/bin/test that runs, but a function internal to bash.
>
> /usr/bin/test/ is provided for environments that want to run bash
> scripts that u
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:26:52 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>
> > > > You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is needed
> > > > by /usr/bin[ and not by /usr/bin/test
> > >
> > > It's quite common for a program to change its be
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:26:52 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> > > You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is needed
> > > by /usr/bin[ and not by /usr/bin/test
> >
> > It's quite common for a program to change its behaviour according to
> > the name used to run it. For example, zcat
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 09:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:26:53 +, Hagen Soengen wrote:
> > > I wonder where the differences are. I would've expected that test and
> > > [ were hardlinks.
> >
> > # /usr/bin/[
> > /usr/bin/[: missing ']'
> > # /usr/bin/test
> >
> > #
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:26:53 +, Hagen Soengen wrote:
> > I wonder where the differences are. I would've expected that test and
> > [ were hardlinks.
>
> # /usr/bin/[
> /usr/bin/[: missing ']'
> # /usr/bin/test
>
> #
>
> You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:00:38 +0200, Arnau Bria wrote:
> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
[ is a synonym for the test command, see man test for details.
This file isn't normally used, because [ and test are builtins in Bash.
--
Neil Bothwick
Some day my ship will come in, but wit
Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 13:02 schrieb ext Alexander Skwar:
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 11:00 schrieb ext Arnau Bria:
> >> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> does any one know what could it be?¿
> >
> > It's the [ from "if [ condition ];
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:02:48 +0200
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 11:00 schrieb ext Arnau Bria:
> >
> >> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> does any one know what could it be?¿
> >
> > It's the [ f
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:42:46 +0200 Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now my question is: does apache/php support chrooting too?
> > And are there some other services, which can be chrooted
> > like bind?
>
> should work without any problems, like the most of the other
> standard internet s
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 11:00 schrieb ext Arnau Bria:
>
>> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
>> [...]
>>
>> does any one know what could it be?¿
>
> It's the [ from "if [ condition ]; then ...", a shortcut for /usr/bin/test.
Nope, not correct.
[09:39:58 [E
Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/25/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
>
> Perfectly normal. It is a program that implements bash style tests
Not *bash* style tests. bash doesn't have much to do with this.
> for script environments tha
On 25 July 2006 01:37, Nick Rout wrote:
Audio is now working with PVR-150. Thanks, Nick, for all your input.
Problem is, I don't know why and I hate it when magic is part of IT. ;-)
The whole difference between yesterday and today is that I tried to compile
the new kernel 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 (as c
Arnau Bria wrote:
> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
> ...
> does any one know what could it be?¿
> thanks in advance.
It is the test application/tool. Try 'info test'.
Regards,
Marco
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:36:55 +0200, Arnau Bria wrote:
> I have a periodically rkhunter runnig in my system, but I was afraid I
> got a corrupted source package...
Portage would refuse to install from a corrupted source package, because
it verifies the checksums of all files it uses.
--
Neil Bo
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 09:07, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/24/06, Paul Stear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes it is just very slow, the mesage stalled keeps coming up and then
> > starts again.
>
> Double check what the connection speed is for XP. You can do the same
> using ethtool under Linux.
> does any one know what could it be?¿
AFAIK it's a synonym to »test«.
Best regards
ce
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:14:02 -0700
Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/25/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
>
> Perfectly normal. It is a program that implements bash style tests
> for script environments that don't normally do them.
Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 11:00 schrieb ext Arnau Bria:
> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
> [...]
>
> does any one know what could it be?¿
It's the [ from "if [ condition ]; then ...", a shortcut for /usr/bin/test.
HTH...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)16
On 7/25/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
Perfectly normal. It is a program that implements bash style tests
for script environments that don't normally do them. For example:
if [ -f /etc/passwd ] ; then
echo "/etc/passwd exists and
Arnau Bria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
>
> #file "["
> [: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for
> GNU/Linux 2.4.1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux
> 2.4.1, stripped
>
> in I can find things like:
> [...]
> -ot does not
Hi,
I've seen a file named "[" in my /usr/bin ...
#file "["
[: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for
GNU/Linux 2.4.1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux
2.4.1, stripped
in I can find things like:
[...]
-ot does not accept -l
%s: unary operator expected
%
On 7/24/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the output of:
>
> 1. cat /proc/version
> 2. gcc -v
> 3. gcc-config -l
To me everything looks OK, but I'd love another set of eyes to look at
my setup.
Yeah, it looks sane to me too.
The only thing I can think of is a probl
On 7/24/06, Adrian Vraciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 24 July 2006 19:39, Richard Fish wrote:
# strace -f ifconfig -a
Ok, thanks.
I've looked through the sources for ifconfig (net-tools-1.60), and
based on the strace output you provided, I don't see how it can be
getting to the "No u
On 7/24/06, Paul Stear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes it is just very slow, the mesage stalled keeps coming up and then starts
again.
Double check what the connection speed is for XP. You can do the same
using ethtool under Linux. You should see 100mbit, full duplex on
both.
One problem coul
75 matches
Mail list logo
