Richard Fish wrote:
> Glad you got it working. If the kernel config is truly the same,
> then I suspect you got an updated version of baselayout or udev
> that fixed it.
Yes, you are right. Baselayout which is on 2005.0 install-cd must
have some bug, which I eliminated during network-install by
Iain Buchanan wrote:
>-install: applet not found
>/init: 41: In: not found
>/init: 45: cat: not found
>/init: 150: sed: not found
>
>
Apparently it is a problem with busybox configuration:
>From another thread on this list less than 12 hours old:
Zac Medico wrote:
>It's not as bad as it look
aabb wrote:
>Thanks for all replies so far.
>
>
>
>>What's the output of "fdisk -l /dev/hda"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Output from "fdisk -l /dev/hda":
>
>Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
>255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
>Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> De
Zac Medico wrote:
>That sounds nice. Do you use busybox for the root-on-loop-AES setup? What is
>better about initramfs? Do you have to compile the cpio archive into the
>kernel or is it just as good when you load it like an initrd? I'm looking
>forward to the howto ;-).
>
>
>
Well, I do
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 08:03 +0200, Richard Fish wrote:
> Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> >happens only when I switch to 2.6.12, weird... anybody seen symptoms
> >like that? First time since I've switched to 2.6.x kernels I've got
> >so many issues with simple kernel upgrade, is there something going
On 2005-07-13 23:29:56 + (Wed, Jul), aabb wrote:
> I use 2 partitions for Windows 98, hda1 and hda5. I set both up as type
> "c" (fat32 LBA) during my gentoo installation, using fdisk. The entries
> in /etc/fstab are almost identical:
>
> /dev/hda1/mnt/win_cvfatumask=0,noexec
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>finally I've got to optimum (in my opinion) combination:
>
>title Gentoo linux (update)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.12-gentoo-r4 real_root=/dev/hda11
>video=vesafb:[EMAIL PROTECTED] splash=verbose
>
>
>
You should also change "real_root=" to jus
Michael Haan gmail.com> writes:
> I guess what I'm trying to figure out is what exists either in
> gentoo-space specifically, or linux-space generally (in that order)
> for working with GPRS.
GSM-GPRS is virtually a TCP/IP highway. All you need is ppp or TCP/IP
on top of it. If you get service
Hello,
I have basic audio working via alsa on several systems.
What do folks use as graphical band equlizer to
increase of decrease the frequency output to the
speakers?
I found lots of apps using hte work mixer, but nothing
seems like what I want. Something graphical that
is an 11 band or more
I just compiled kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r5 almost exactly the same way I've
compiled every other kernel, but this one won't boot!
I used genkernel as so:
sudo genkernel --no-menuconfig --save-config --no-bootsplash --gensplash
--gensplash=emergence --install
--kernel-config=/home/iain/configs/2.6.12-
John J. Foster wrote:
Good evening all. My San Disk ImageMate dual reader said goodbye to our
family today. She should have left a few months ago.
So, what I'm searching for is a replacement reader. I saw some good
reviews for ImageMate® 8-in-1 Reader/Writer. I don't really need all
eight, but
Good evening all. My San Disk ImageMate dual reader said goodbye to our
family today. She should have left a few months ago.
So, what I'm searching for is a replacement reader. I saw some good
reviews for ImageMate® 8-in-1 Reader/Writer. I don't really need all
eight, but so what. What I'd really
Richard Fish wrote:
>
> Hi Zac,
>
> I know this is a couple of weeks old, but I just wanted to thank you for
> trying it. The problem turned out to be a kernel bug. In case you are
> curious:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4857
>
>
Yes, that's interesting. Thanks
>
>>I su
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> On July 13, 2005 03:11 pm, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>
>>On July 13, 2005 02:47 pm, Richard Fish wrote:
>>
>>>Not quite, its an initramfs. Slightly different rules apply for
>>>initramfs vs initrd, so you also have to remove the "initrd" line
>>>from grub if you want to
Richard Fish wrote:
>Ian K wrote:
>
>
>
>>Heres the bad news.. I turned my laptop on today, and the fans didn't
>>come on like
>>they did before, and within five minutes and 1 compile, the laptop was off.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Ok, so you defintely have some kind of problem with your fans. Did
Hello list.
I just decided to rebuild perl as I recently noticed that perl wasn't working
for me anymore. When I just happened to need to use it, of course.
As an aside, if perhaps relevant, I had a couple of problems with failed
compiles. As is usually is the fix for this machine, I opened the
On July 13, 2005 03:11 pm, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> On July 13, 2005 02:47 pm, Richard Fish wrote:
> > Not quite, its an initramfs. Slightly different rules apply for
> > initramfs vs initrd, so you also have to remove the "initrd" line
> > from grub if you want to eliminate it.
>
> So if I unde
Thanks for all replies so far.
>What's the output of "fdisk -l /dev/hda"?
>
>
Output from "fdisk -l /dev/hda":
Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Bl
Did you recently update your kernel? There is a problem with
gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4. There is a bug in iptables that causes problems
with KDE logins. If you stop iptables, your login will work.
If you upgrade to gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r5, the problem will be solved.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:39:38 -0400 Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aabb wrote:
> >Here's a strange one...
> >
> >I use 2 partitions for Windows 98, hda1 and hda5. I set both up as
> >type "c" (fat32 LBA) during my gentoo installation, using fdisk. The
> >entries in /etc/fstab are almost identica
That doesn't seem to address the issue as mounting by hand still spits
out errors relative to partition problems. What's the output of
"fdisk -l /dev/hda"?
On 7/13/05, Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aabb wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Here's a strange one...
> >
> >I use 2 partitions for Windows 98,
On Wednesday 13 of July 2005 18:07, José Pedro Saraiva wrote:
> iface_eth1="192.168.0.254 netmask 255.255.0.0"
Your modem/router which is 192.168.1.254 on eth0 fits the netmask of the eth1
network.
--
Petr
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
aabb wrote:
Hi,
Here's a strange one...
I use 2 partitions for Windows 98, hda1 and hda5. I set both up as type
"c" (fat32 LBA) during my gentoo installation, using fdisk. The entries
in /etc/fstab are almost identical:
/dev/hda1/mnt/win_cvfatumask=0,noexec 0 0
/dev/hda5/
Hi,
Here's a strange one...
I use 2 partitions for Windows 98, hda1 and hda5. I set both up as type
"c" (fat32 LBA) during my gentoo installation, using fdisk. The entries
in /etc/fstab are almost identical:
/dev/hda1/mnt/win_cvfatumask=0,noexec 0 0
/dev/hda5/mnt/win_dvf
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:44:52PM +0200, Richard Fish wrote:
> I need to write up some howto's in the next week or so, because using an
> initramfs works much better than an initrd for encrypted root.
>
Please, please do!
--
The revolution will not be televised.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org maili
On July 13, 2005 02:47 pm, Richard Fish wrote:
> Not quite, its an initramfs. Slightly different rules apply for
> initramfs vs initrd, so you also have to remove the "initrd" line
> from grub if you want to eliminate it.
So if I understand correctly something like:
title Gentoo linux (update)
Hi Dave,
> Sorry I don't remember the details but I do remember that
> was the basic gist of the issue.
thanks for the hint, will try it out on weekend (reemerging
OOo will take a while, I guess ;-).
Thanks & best regards
ce
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Zac Medico wrote:
>A. Khattri wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Nope... might try it as well but my understanding that all genkernel
>>>does is automates compilation/installation and makes sure options for
>>>devfs or udev are on (depending on --[no]ud
Zac Medico wrote:
>Richard Fish wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings list,
>>
>>I have spent most of my weekend trying to get fbsplash running on my
>>laptop. I've managed to resolve most of the issues (getting the
>>initramfs to be recognized, starting up RAID, LVM, and encryption from
>>the initramfs, etc)
A. Khattri bway.net> writes:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, James wrote:
>
> > Ahhh that's it:
> > # cat /usr/portage/metadata/timestamp
> > Tue Jul 12 13:06:52 UTC 2005
> > # date
> > Wed Jul 13 12:05:26 UTC 2005
>
> On my machines, the master rsync server does a sync at 3am.
> The rest of the mac
A. Khattri wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>
>
>>Nope... might try it as well but my understanding that all genkernel
>>does is automates compilation/installation and makes sure options for
>>devfs or udev are on (depending on --[no]udev --[no]devfs flags).
>
>
> True, bu
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> Nope... might try it as well but my understanding that all genkernel
> does is automates compilation/installation and makes sure options for
> devfs or udev are on (depending on --[no]udev --[no]devfs flags).
True, but a lot of people have had probl
Missed the original post but it sounds similar to what I had run into awhile
back.
Sorry I don't remember what I did exactly but the problem was basically with
the fonts, not OO in particular.
Now I don't remember exactly but re-emerging the font packages (freetype
specifically and possibly fontc
Richard Fish wrote:
>
>>Here's what I get booting (I'm writing it from memory mostly so don't
>>think it's exact output):
>>
>>-install: applet not found
>>/init: 41: ln: not found
>>/init: 45: cat: not found
>>
>>
>
>
> It looks to me like your /initramfs is completely screwed. Whatever
> cr
Hi Ian,
> Maybe the update changed some things in X.org's
> configuration file?
the file is exact the same as before, I copied it manually.
But anyway, thanks a lot for the idea!
Best regards
ce
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>On July 13, 2005 11:43 am, A. Khattri wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
>>>
>>>genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
>>>
>>>
>>Have you tried building a kernel manual
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
>I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
>
>genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
>
>produced unbootable system :(
>Symptoms point most probably to udev being used by default etc. Here's
>what I have in grub.conf:
>
>title Gentoo linux (updated)
> roo
On July 13, 2005 11:43 am, A. Khattri wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> > I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
> >
> > genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
>
> Have you tried building a kernel manually (i.e. without using
> genkernel)?
Nope... might t
Ian K wrote:
>Heres the bad news.. I turned my laptop on today, and the fans didn't
>come on like
>they did before, and within five minutes and 1 compile, the laptop was off.
>
>
>
Ok, so you defintely have some kind of problem with your fans. Did you
follow the cleaning instructions that othe
And this will teach me to scan all messages in a thread before I start
replying!!!
Glad you got it working. If the kernel config is truly the same, then I
suspect you got an updated version of baselayout or udev that fixed it.
-Richard
Jarry wrote:
>
>> In the meantime I'm trying to update my
Jarry wrote:
>> In the maintenance mode, does /sys/block/md0/* exist? What does "cat
>> /proc/mdstat" report?
>
>
Actually, if the kernel autodetection runs at boot time, /proc/mdstat
should show the devices regardless of whether the device nodes exist or
notso something is a bit strange wit
Mike Williams wrote:
>On Wednesday 13 July 2005 15:09, Jarry wrote:
>
>
>>It seems (or at least it is discussed there) that this (udev does not
>>create /dev/md* at startup) is some kernel-bug! If some of our kernel
>>developers is watching this list, could he confirm or refuse it?
>>Can I someh
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
>
> genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
>
> produced unbootable system :(
> Symptoms point most probably to udev being used by default etc. Here's
> what I have in grub.conf:
>
> title Gentoo linux (update
On 7/13/05, luis jure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> el Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:19:06 -0500
> Canek Peláez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Anyway, I'm pretty sure ogle is unsupported.
>
> is it? i emerged it normally, it wasn't masked or anything. it also used to
> work on my previous linux install
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, James wrote:
> Ahhh that's it:
> # cat /usr/portage/metadata/timestamp
> Tue Jul 12 13:06:52 UTC 2005
> # date
> Wed Jul 13 12:05:26 UTC 2005
On my machines, the master rsync server does a sync at 3am.
The rest of the machines sync with the master server at 4am.
This way th
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
>
> genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
Have you tried building a kernel manually (i.e. without using genkernel)?
--
Aj.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I recently updated portage tree & kernel and using usual
genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
produced unbootable system :(
Symptoms point most probably to udev being used by default etc. Here's
what I have in grub.conf:
title Gentoo linux (updated)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /kernel-genkernel
Did you created /dev/tty1? From the ebuild:
* It appears that the /dev/tty1 character device doesn't exist on
* the root filesystem. This will prevent the silent mode from working
* properly. You can fix the problem by doing:
* mount --bind / /lib/splash/tmp
* mknod /lib/splash/tmp/dev/tt
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, simply change wrote:
> what is the gentoo official web site WEB DEVELOPMENT TOOL? (like screem, nvu
> or what?)
I dont know if there is an "official" tool - speaking from experience many
designers use whatever they feel comfortable with.
There is a new design for the site cu
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 19:50, Tom Wesley wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:14 +0200
>
> I haven't seen anyone post this script as yet. It's by ciaranm and is
> very useful when people ask on irc why a certain package version can't
> be installed on their arch.
>
> Sample output:
> [EMAIL PROTECT
> > What about routing? As root run:
> > $ route
> # route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 00
> eth1
> loopback* 255.0.0.0 U
Dave Nebinger joat.com> writes:
>
> > I recently set up an internal server for rsync and distfile distribution.
> > How do I check to ensure that this internal server actually was successful
> > at downloading the rsync files and the appropriate distfiles for the other
> > sytems?
>
> /usr/port
In the meantime I'm trying to update my system to 2.6.12-r4
(up to now I used 2.6.11-r3 from 2005.0 universal installation cd)...
Actually, I did not updated the system, but installed once more.
This time as a "network installation", with latest portage and
stage1 downloaded from some mirror-s
> your localhost eth0 -> shorewall -> Inet
> your localhost eth1 -> shorewall -> your other machines
correct :)
but shorewall is not responsible for the problem, since I ran all the
tests with shorewall stopped and all other network services stopped as
well.
> What address ranges do you use?
/etc/
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 17:41, Vincent A. Primavera wrote:
backing up sys?
that is like backing up /proc... there is nopthing interessting, nothing that
will or should survive a reboot, so why do you want to make a backup?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Dave Nebinger joat.com> writes:
> Yes but we get back to the point that I had been trying to make - the
> embedded devices (even nanobots) would not need to build from source. I
> know if I had embedded nanobots I would want them focusing on the job they
> were embedded for, not recompiling so
/sys is a completely virtual filesystem. Why would you bother to back it
up? You can't restore it so the backup does you no good at all.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
My immediate guess would be a routing issue. What's the routing definition
for when eth1 is up vs down? Issue the 'route' command as root and send us
the details.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello,
Is it possible to copy/backup the /sys directory while the system is
"live" with all filesystems mounted? I have tried a few methods ie: cp,
cpio, and rsync, all as root. I am getting various "Permission denied" and
"Invalid argument" errors. Does anybody have any clear answers ju
David Morgan wrote:
> emerge wtf
> wtf sol
Thanks for the tip!
Typically *nix: small program, does only one thing but does it well.
I like the man page.
-- Remy
Remove underscore and suffix in reply address for a timely response.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
* José Pedro Saraiva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-12 23:30]:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I connect to the net through eth0 and have a masquerading
> through eth1 to my other computers, using shorewall.
Uh, I'm not sure i understand you.
your localhost eth0 -> shorewall -> Inet
your localhost eth1 -> shore
Hello,
I'm quite desperate and have tried just about anything.
I'll try to explain it...
I connect to the net through eth0 and have a masquerading through eth1
to my other computers, using shorewall.
My server never had any problems of this kind and all was fine until a
couple of days ago. I'm exp
> I recently set up an internal server for rsync and distfile distribution.
> How do I check to ensure that this internal server actually was successful
> at downloading the rsync files and the appropriate distfiles for the other
> sytems?
/usr/portage/metadata/timestamp contains the timestamp for
> Methinks your indescretions and prejudices against micros, is insensitive
> to the future, sensate possibilitys of micros and the things they inhabit.
> micros are entering the human body at an alarming rate. Don't you thing
> we need mechanisms to keep their interal code robust and current?
> Na
Dave Nebinger joat.com> writes:
> > Thanks for the scripts and help!
> That's what we're here for
BACKGROUND:
I did not use your scripts yet...today I'll implement them.
I recently set up an internal server for rsync and distfile distribution.
How do I check to ensure that this internal serve
Dave Nebinger joat.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for the scripts and help!
>
> That's what we're here for
>
> > When I roll out a new TCP/IP based data-logger
> > (hopefully this fall) it'll take sensor inputs and control a few outputs.
> > No humans will use the devices for anything other than i
> What is SOL? Someone care to tell me? (I'm the OP)
Excrement out of luck, but use the standard slang curse word instead of
excrement.
;-)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 22:21 Wed 13 Jul , Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> What is SOL? Someone care to tell me? (I'm the OP)
Sh*t out of luck
emerge wtf
wtf sol
:)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:13 +0100, David Morgan wrote:
> On 14:49 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
> > But the use.mask-- even the correct one-- still does not lead to an
> > explanation or documentation of what the mask of a USE flag actually
> > means or what it means in this particular case
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 15:09, Jarry wrote:
> It seems (or at least it is discussed there) that this (udev does not
> create /dev/md* at startup) is some kernel-bug! If some of our kernel
> developers is watching this list, could he confirm or refuse it?
> Can I somehow get rid of udev, when it i
Richard Fish wrote:
In short, if you don't really know what initramfs is, you are probably
not using it! So I am not sure why you are having this problem.
Neither am I. I already installed a couple of servers with full raid1
using various distros (RedHat, Caldera, Debian), now I'm trying
Gento
Yuan MEI wrote:
Hello,
I installed my gentoo system one year ago, and emerge sync about
once a week to keep up to date. And I am using gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1.
Do I have to upgrade and emerge -e ?
Which version of gcc are you using?
Thanks
I'm using exactly the same gcc version an
Chris White wrote:
Added a bazillion spell fixes, also a list of places to find GUI frontends for
MySQL:
Thanks goes to my mom, my dad, my family for all their support
I'd also like to thank the academy for their hard effort
Philip Webb for tolerating my odd grammar/spelling/logic
Bruce Wolk fo
Hello,
I installed my gentoo system one year ago, and emerge sync about
once a week to keep up to date. And I am using gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1.
Do I have to upgrade and emerge -e ?
Which version of gcc are you using?
Thanks
--
Yuan MEI
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 14:49 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
> But the use.mask-- even the correct one-- still does not lead to an
> explanation or documentation of what the mask of a USE flag actually
> means or what it means in this particular case (why this specific USE
> flag is masked under this specific pr
On 7/13/05, Jim Hatfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone remind me what it means when you just
> get millions of GRUBs scrolling up the screen.
>
> Came back from a few days away and my box was locked up.
> Rebooting gets me the GRUB menu but which ever kernel
> I selected started to boot
David Morgan schreef:
> (top posting because I can't be bothered to sort all the irrelevant
> stuff you posted)
>
> The person in question is using /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86
>
> If you look in /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86/parent you'll see that
> t's parent profile is /usr/portage/pr
(top posting because I can't be bothered to sort all the irrelevant
stuff you posted)
The person in question is using /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86
If you look in /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86/parent you'll see that
t's parent profile is /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/. If you look in
/usr/
David Morgan schreef:
> On 12:39 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
>>Obviously -- or at least it seems obvious to me, but that doesn't say
>>much-- that if the package is hard-masked, the USE flag that is
>>associated with it will be disabled (because the package the USE flag
>>would call is un
el Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:19:06 -0500
Canek Peláez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Anyway, I'm pretty sure ogle is unsupported.
is it? i emerged it normally, it wasn't masked or anything. it also used to
work on my previous linux installation.
anyway, i'm using xine now, it's the only dvd player i
On 12:39 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
>
> What does which profile it is have to do with the mask?
> /etc/portage/package.unmask unmasks hard-masked applications on the
> profile you are using-- the profile supercedes all later adjustment
> files, insofar as all later adjustment files (/et
I posted ages ago about failing to update mplayer due
to compile errors which seemed to be caused by it using header
files under /usr/src/linux.
So after a while of headscratching I did the obvious: renamed
/usr/src/linux to /usr/src/linux.NIU and re-emerged. No problem.
Still don't know why mpla
Can someone remind me what it means when you just
get millions of GRUBs scrolling up the screen.
Came back from a few days away and my box was locked up.
Rebooting gets me the GRUB menu but which ever kernel
I selected started to boot then scrolled up reams of very
nasty looking messages. Sounded
David Morgan schreef:
> On 12:06 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>>Which is why the proper way to unmask a hard-masked package is to enter
>>it into /etc/portage/package.unmask (and often thereafter also into
>>/etc/portage/package.keywords, as many hard-masked packages are also
>>keyword-
AybOwan!
dear friends,
what is the gentoo official web site WEB DEVELOPMENT TOOL? (like screem, nvu or what?)-- ..."The future lies ahead." ___< Have you mooed today? > ---
\^__^ \ (oo) \___
(__)
\
)\/\
On 12:06 Wed 13 Jul , Holly Bostick wrote:
> Which is why the proper way to unmask a hard-masked package is to enter
> it into /etc/portage/package.unmask (and often thereafter also into
> /etc/portage/package.keywords, as many hard-masked packages are also
> keyword-masked).
>
Great, but wha
David Morgan schreef:
> You could remove win32codecs from base/use.mask, try and use it and see
> if it works since it shouldn't break anything. But each time you did
> emerge sync it'd get written over.
Which is why the proper way to unmask a hard-masked package is to enter
it into /etc/portage/
On 22:19 Tue 12 Jul , Canek Pel??ez wrote:
> Isn't ogle unsupported? I suppose it has to do with Xv, but I don't know
> really.
>
> Anyway, I'm pretty sure ogle is unsupported.
>
What makes you say that?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 10:50 Wed 13 Jul , Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> uclibc profile
> /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86/
>
That's probably the problem then
> How can I check?
Profiles have use.mask files.
uclibc/x86 doesn't have one, but it's parent is uclibc whose parent is
base, and win32codecs is in /usr/portage/
89 matches
Mail list logo
