[gentoo-hardened] Feedback on updated SELinux docs

Overall, it looks really good. Kudos for a job well done. I put in a couple of edits to try to improve a couple parts that seemed a little hard to follow, but the main area for improvement I see is that policy types are not discussed as a core concept. "Users and logins" mentions targeted policy i

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Feedback on updated SELinux docs

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 07:02:10AM +, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:13:58AM -0700, S. Lockwood-Childs wrote: > > Overall, it looks really good. Kudos for a job well done. > > > > I put in a couple of edits to try to improve a couple parts that seemed

[gentoo-hardened] Feedback on article recommending Gentoo for SELinux

I'd appreciate feedback on a blog-style article[1] talking about how CIL is going to improve SELinux policy maintenance, and in particular, the last section where I try to point out how good Gentoo is for experimenting with SELinux technologies. The article is maintained as an rst file in github[

Re: [gentoo-hardened] Feedback on article recommending Gentoo for SELinux

Thanks both Jason and Sven for your feedback. I'll try for an update taking it into account this weekend. Also, thanks for your ongoing work towards keeping Gentoo SELinux support in good shape! --SJLC