ions of the source code
to disable it. (e.g., PostgreSQL, Apache and Firefox) Optional support
of IPv6 is rapidly disappearing from the tree as it is anyway. We might
as well expect it to come regardless of our wishes for a different time
frame. Indeed, it is here already in some of the more importa
SQL soon, once Mr. Chvatal
(scarabeus) or Mr. Lauer (bonsaikitten) get the time to test and commit.
The configuration files will be in /etc/postgresql-${SLOT}/. And
src_test() works on it now with its socket created in ${T} and
executables and miscellaneous files in ${S}/src/test/regress/.
All of that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/2012 06:36 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I’m building from scratch a Samba file server which I may use
> samba4 git version (i.e. not a package from Gentoo) but the rest
> will be stock Gentoo and for the moment, I’m run
nd not desktops.
>> I thought I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
>
> I'm using hardened on desktop in last ~6-7 years. And I know at
> least two people who also use hardened on desktop.
>
You now know three.
- --
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux De
rovide minimum recommended configuration for IPv6
>> routing/firewall? I think enabling IPv6 by default should begins
>> from writing such docs.
> # ip6tables -A INPUT -j DROP # ip6tables -A OUTPUT -j DROP #
> ip6tables -A FORWARD -j DROP There you are safe now.
>
This
read IPv6 RFCs, but understood all security implications of
> IPv6-specific features. Last time I tried to google for such docs
> was few years ago, but I found nothing at all.
>
Those who have IPv6 enabled in the kernel unintentionally probably
aren't very security minded and probably
On 2015-09-02 12:13, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So by now most people have heard the news that the Grsecurity/PaX team
> are no longer going to be making their stable patches available. The
> reason is that they are in dispute with a certain embedded systems
> vendor and those
On 2017-05-11 09:31, Max R.D. Parmer wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Perhaps I missed it, but I've been so far unable to find a position/plan
> for the future of hardened-sources from the Gentoo Hardened project
> members. I've searched the site and mailing list archives. Has any such
> statement been made?
>
