On 30 Aug 2015 at 21:54, François wrote:
> Thanks for your answer (sorry to respond that late). It actually makes
> sense, I thought there was some *magic* possible.
i wouldn't call it magic but PaX used to provide RANDEXEC:
https://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/randexec.txt
2015-09-07 10:41 GMT-04:00 PaX Team :
>
> On 30 Aug 2015 at 21:54, François wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your answer (sorry to respond that late). It actually makes
> > sense, I thought there was some *magic* possible.
>
> i wouldn't call it magic but PaX used to provide RANDEXEC:
>
> https://pax.grse
On 7 Sep 2015 at 11:06, René Rhéaume wrote:
> 2015-09-07 10:41 GMT-04:00 PaX Team :
> > i wouldn't call it magic but PaX used to provide RANDEXEC:
> >
> > https://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/randexec.txt
>
> Is RANDEXEC abandoned because it could not be ported to other architectures?
no, portabilit