On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 04:46:03PM -0700, S. Lockwood-Childs wrote:
> I'd appreciate feedback on a blog-style article[1] talking about
> how CIL is going to improve SELinux policy maintenance, and in
> particular, the last section where I try to point out how good Gentoo
> is for experimenting wi
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> Overall a good article. One thing which I would also point out together
> with the move to CIL is that there is now no "base" module. In the 2.3
> and earlier userlands, all the important things were in "base.pp" and
> then other things were ad
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> > Secondly, related to "poor support for preserving local changes across
> > system updates". The tools now have the concept of priority so users can
> > easy completely replace
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jason Zaman wrote:
>> > Secondly, related to "poor support for preserving local changes across
>> > system updates". The tools now have the con
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:46 AM, S. Lockwood-Childs
wrote:
> I'd appreciate feedback on a blog-style article[1] talking about
> how CIL is going to improve SELinux policy maintenance, and in
> particular, the last section where I try to point out how good Gentoo
> is for experimenting with SELinux
