Hi all
I have a situation that I'd like to hear your opinion on.
In bug #535992 a what seems like simple problem is asking for quite some
work. It covers a currently cosmetic denial (i.e. SELinux is preventing
something but that does not seem to have any noticeable impact on the
system) regarding
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:21:08 +
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> 1. I can temporarily ignore the issue, perhaps hiding the cosmetic
> denial behind dontaudit statements
> 2. I can restrictively add to kernel_t those rules that do not
> trigger the neverallow rules and ignore/dontaudit the rest
> 3. I ca
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:04:34PM +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:21:08 +
> Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>
> > 1. I can temporarily ignore the issue, perhaps hiding the cosmetic
> > denial behind dontaudit statements
> > 2. I can restrictively add to kernel_t those rules that do n
