I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the hardened
profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops. I thought
I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
- Grant
Well, it's rare to see Gentoo on servers. But all my servers that runs Gentoo
(only two actually) are using the hardened version.
I never used hardened on Desktop systems.
Sent from my iPhone
On 08/06/2012, at 04:44, Grant wrote:
> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that th
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:44:26AM -0700, Grant wrote:
> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the hardened
> profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops. I thought
> I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
I'm using hardened on desktop in last ~6-
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:44:26 -0700
Grant wrote:
> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the hardened
> profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops. I thought
> I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
I never used non-hardened linux on my desktops.
pg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/2012 04:34 AM, Alex Efros wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:44:26AM -0700, Grant wrote:
>> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the
>> hardened profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops.
>> I tho
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:15:40AM -0400, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> >> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the
> >> hardened profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops.
> >> I thought I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
Actually, I see no rea
Hi
On 06/08/12 07:44, Grant wrote:
I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the hardened
profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops. I thought
I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
I'm using hardened on 3 laptops and 1 desktop, more or less on a daily
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 07:15:40 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/08/2012 04:34 AM, Alex Efros wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:44:26AM -0700, Grant wrote:
> >> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that th
On 06/08/2012 03:44 AM, Grant wrote:
I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the hardened
profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops. I thought
I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the case?
- Grant
I would have no problems with that statement except that i
On 06/08/2012 09:06 AM, Alex Efros wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:15:40AM -0400, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the
hardened profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops.
I thought I'd check with you guys on this. Is that the
On 08/06/12 17:35, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Only critical bug is broken VMware/VirtualBox on amd64+hardened.
>
> This one is a moving target. Sometimes broken, times fixed. kvm is
> working very well of late.
Uh!, even with kernexec, uderef, mprotect etc etc etc, with both
hardened host and
On 08/06/12 13:15, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 04:34 AM, Alex Efros wrote:
>> Hi!
>
>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:44:26AM -0700, Grant wrote:
>>> I started a discussion on gentoo-user about the fact that the
>>> hardened profile appears to only be for servers and not desktops.
>>> I th
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:35:28AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > Only critical bug is broken VMware/VirtualBox on amd64+hardened.
>
> This one is a moving target. Sometimes broken, times fixed. kvm is
> working very well of late.
KVM is able to run Win7 and MacOS with speed comparab
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300
Alex Efros wrote:
> Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops.
Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and
maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too, I'd guess.
Not suggesting there should be, just stati
On 08/06/12 21:40, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300
> Alex Efros wrote:
>
>> Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops.
>
> Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and
> maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too,
On 08/06/12 21:40, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300
> Alex Efros wrote:
>
>> Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops.
>
> Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and
> maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too,
I for one used Trusted Debian / Adamantix before Hardened Gentoo.
It was a distro of choice based on Debian and promoted SSP and PaX-enabled
kernels.
The main problem was, that it practically remained a one man project, led
by Peter Busser. After some time - probably due to the lack of enough
resou
2012.Június 8.(P) 23:52 időpontban "Tóth Attila" ezt írta:
> I think Hardened Gentoo install is not substantially more complicated to
> install compared to a regular Gentoo install nowdays. It would be the
> recommended first distro for a newbie. If there would be some popular
> commodity Gentoo-ba
18 matches
Mail list logo
