On 05/17/2012 12:16 AM, RB wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
What's the difference between your kernel konfig and Liberté Linux
2012.1's kernel konfig? Because you told it worked for you.
Quite a lot, not the least of which theirs is a 32-bit kernel and
mine's 64-bi
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
> Liberte, last I looked, has quite a few hardening features off.
True — this is made necessary by having to support virtualized
environments (and, of course, Xorg, wrt. GRKERNSEC_IO). Since out last
discussion on the subject, I have “disc
2012.Május 17.(Cs) 15:07 időpontban Maxim Kammerer ezt írta:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
>> Liberte, last I looked, has quite a few hardening features off.
>
> True — this is made necessary by having to support virtualized
> environments (and, of course, Xorg, wrt
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> How would I change the way /dev gets mounted? I don't have noexec as an
> option listed by mount for the udev entry.
I mount devtmpfs on /dev in initramfs, but you can add an entry to
/etc/fstab, too — see /etc/init.d/udev-mount for details
On 05/17/2012 10:08 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>> How would I change the way /dev gets mounted? I don't have noexec as an
>> option listed by mount for the udev entry.
>
> I mount devtmpfs on /dev in initramfs, but you can add an entry to
> /
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> Is there a bug open for this?
There is now (bug #416415). The issue is with reading EBDA area (not
with writing as I wrote previously). I think I didn't open the bug
previously because after looking at v86d sources, the issue seemed
harmless
Hi,
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 17:29:44 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 12:12 PM, PaX Team wrote:
> > On 16 May 2012 at 16:39, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> >
> >> at the moment the thunderbird-ebuild in the tree does a "pax mark m"
> >> on the binary.
> >> At least for me thunderbird wor
2012.Május 17.(Cs) 17:08 időpontban Maxim Kammerer ezt írta:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, "Tóth Attila"
> wrote:
>> How would I change the way /dev gets mounted? I don't have noexec as an
>> option listed by mount for the udev entry.
>
> I mount devtmpfs on /dev in initramfs, but you can add
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
> Please open a bug, attach both config files. It would be useful if you also
> identify on which options it breaks. Liberte, last I looked, has quite a
> few hardening features off. Pay attention to GRKERNSEC_IO, PAX_PAGEEXEC,
> PAX_KER
On 17.05.2012 20:25, Radek Madej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 16 May 2012 17:29:44 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 12:12 PM, PaX Team wrote:
>>> On 16 May 2012 at 16:39, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>>>
at the moment the thunderbird-ebuild in the tree does a "pax mark m"
on t
I've recently come across some articles about the hal - dbus - udev -
consolekit - upower udisks - systemd movement. And there's openrc. A
couple of months before I converted the systems to openrc.
What we should prepare for next? When will it happen? Is it already
happening?
Somebody should pull t
On Fri, 18 May 2012 03:01:00 +0200
"Tóth Attila" wrote:
> Somebody should pull the brakes, please.
My humble advise: try making your own custom scripts for runit, minit or
similar minimalistic supervisor together with sudo or su for PAM
support (setuid-root isn't required for root->unprivileged
Hi!
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:56:06AM +, Pavel Labushev wrote:
> > Somebody should pull the brakes, please.
> My humble advise: try making your own custom scripts for runit, minit or
Actually, if you decide to go this way, you probably find packages from my
overlay 'powerman' is good startin
13 matches
Mail list logo
