On 09/03/2011 04:38 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> 2011.Szeptember 3.(Szo) 21:46 időpontban Anthony G. Basile ezt írta:
>> It does look like the same issue again. I don't think we really solved
>> it, but just found a workaround which you specify above.
>
> It's definitely back.
>
>> It turns out th
On 09/03/2011 04:38 PM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> 2011.Szeptember 3.(Szo) 21:46 időpontban Anthony G. Basile ezt írta:
>> It does look like the same issue again. I don't think we really solved
>> it, but just found a workaround which you specify above.
>
> It's definitely back.
>
>> It turns out th
Hi everyone,
It looks like upstream RSBAC is active again. Gentoo used to have
rsbac-sources, so it would be nice to get them back.
I'm not sure right now if I want them to be part of hardened-sources
unconditionally, or switched on and off with a USE="rsbac" flag, or as a
separate package calle
El 05/09/11 01:07, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> I tested but hit a compile time error, but I didn't test very hard. If
> you're instrested in RSBAC, please test and we'll start to bug report
> and send patches upstream to help them out
blueness didn't state out but I will, RSBAC docs may be also
